World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
15119
World Ranking
2354
National Ranking
1173

James H. Anderson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 299 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

James H. Anderson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

James H. Anderson is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including social sciences and computer science, addressing topics relevant to public policy, cross-border cooperation, governance, and computing systems.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science

Within these fields, Anderson's work covers subfields such as:

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Public Administration
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Information Systems

Key topics addressed in their research are:

  • Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
  • Political Systems and Governance
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Corruption and Economic Development

James H. Anderson has contributed to academic literature through numerous publications. Among recent papers are:

  • "Inter-city collaboration: Why and how cities work, learn and advocate together" (2023), published in Global Policy
  • "Light Reading: Optimizing Reader/Writer Locking for Read-Dominant Real-Time Workloads (Artifact)" (2021), published by Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, such as:

  • Katharine Robb
  • Michelle LaPointe
  • Kathryn Hemsing
  • Grant W. Anderson
  • J. de Jong

James H. Anderson's publications also include book contributions, with titles published by notable publishers:

  • "Confronting China" (2024) published by Bloomsbury Publishing plc
  • "Which Data Do Economists Use to Study Corruption? A Cross-Section of Corruption Research" (2025) published by Washington, DC: World Bank eBooks

The scientist's work appears in venues such as:

  • Global Policy
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Best Publications

  • Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis

    Joseph Leung;Laurie Kelly;James H. Anderson

  • A categorization of real-time multiprocessor scheduling problems and algorithms

    John Carpenter;Shelby H. Funk;Philip Holman;Anand Srinivasan

  • LITMUS^RT : A Testbed for Empirically Comparing Real-Time Multiprocessor Schedulers

    John Calandrino;Hennadiy Leontyev;Aaron Block;UmaMaheswari Devi

  • Scheduling and locking in multiprocessor real-time operating systems

    James H. Anderson;Bjorn B. Brandenburg

  • A Flexible Real-Time Locking Protocol for Multiprocessors

    A. Block;H. Leontyev;B.B. Brandenburg;J.H. Anderson

  • Early-release fair scheduling

    J.H. Anderson;A. Srinivasan

  • Mixed Pfair/ERfair scheduling of asynchronous periodic tasks

    James H. Anderson;Anand Srinivasan

  • Tardiness bounds under global EDF scheduling on a multiprocessor

    Umamaheswari C. Devi;J. H. Anderson

  • Real-time computing with lock-free shared objects

    James H. Anderson;Srikanth Ramamurthy;Kevin Jeffay

  • Outstanding Paper Award: Making Shared Caches More Predictable on Multicore Platforms

    Bryan C. Ward;Jonathan L. Herman;Christopher J. Kenna;James H. Anderson

  • An Empirical Comparison of Global, Partitioned, and Clustered Multiprocessor EDF Schedulers

    Andrea Bastoni;Bjorn B. Brandenburg;James H. Anderson

  • Mixed Pfair/ERfair scheduling of asynchronous periodic tasks

    J.H. Anderson;A. Srinivasan

  • Shared-memory mutual exclusion: major research trends since 1986

    James H. Anderson;Yong-Jik Kim;Ted Herman

  • An EDF-based scheduling algorithm for multiprocessor soft real-time systems

    J.H. Anderson;V. Bud;U.C. Devi

  • A Hybrid Real-Time Scheduling Approach for Large-Scale Multicore Platforms

    J.M. Calandrino;J.H. Anderson;D.P. Baumberger

  • Mixed-Criticality Real-Time Scheduling for Multicore Systems

    Malcolm S. Mollison;Jeremy P. Erickson;James H. Anderson;Sanjoy K. Baruah

  • GPUSync: A Framework for Real-Time GPU Management

    Glenn A. Elliott;Bryan C. Ward;James H. Anderson

  • GPU Scheduling on the NVIDIA TX2: Hidden Details Revealed

    Tanya Amert;Nathan Otterness;Ming Yang;James H. Anderson

  • Real-Time Scheduling on Multicore Platforms

    J.H. Anderson;J.M. Calandrino;U.C. Devi

  • On the Scalability of Real-Time Scheduling Algorithms on Multicore Platforms: A Case Study

    B.B. Brandenburg;J.M. Calandrino;J.H. Anderson

  • Optimality Results for Multiprocessor Real-Time Locking

    Bjorn B. Brandenburg;James H. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Moir
Mark Moir Oracle (US)
Sanjoy Baruah
Sanjoy Baruah Washington University in St. Louis
Mohamed G. Gouda
Mohamed G. Gouda The University of Texas at Austin
Samarjit Chakraborty
Samarjit Chakraborty University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kevin Jeffay
Kevin Jeffay University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lothar Thiele
Lothar Thiele ETH Zurich
Gary Bishop
Gary Bishop University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Luis Almeida
Luis Almeida University of Porto
Victoria J. Fraser
Victoria J. Fraser Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science offers a wide range of online degree options and career pathways to suit different goals, timelines, and backgrounds. For those looking to quickly enter the workforce or boost their credentials, you might consider quick certifications that pay well. These programs are often completed in a matter of months and can help you qualify for in-demand tech roles.

If you're interested in earning an advanced degree at a faster pace, the quickest masters degree online options allow you to finish your studies in as little as 12–18 months. Many students are focused on finding graduate degrees that are worth it—those that offer strong job prospects, high earning potential, and industry recognition.

Alternatively, 2 year online degrees provide a flexible foundation in Computer Science. These associate programs are ideal for career changers or those seeking a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree. Whether you’re seeking short-term certifications or in-depth graduate study, there’s an online pathway designed to fit your needs and accelerate your journey in tech.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles