World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
19456
World Ranking
2058
National Ranking
838

John F. McCarthy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 206 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

John F. McCarthy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

John F. McCarthy is a researcher affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their work predominantly lies within the field of psychology, with a specific emphasis on clinical psychology. They also contribute to related areas such as general health professions, sociology and political science, global and planetary change, and ecology.

Their research topics cover several specialized themes, including suicide and self-harm studies, mental health treatment and access, posttraumatic stress disorder research, and health policy implementation science. Other areas of interest include conservation, biodiversity, and resource management, COVID-19's impact on reproduction, and health disparities and outcomes.

John F. McCarthy has published several papers, among which the following stand out:

  • Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration (2021, JAMA Network Open)
  • Land reform rationalities and their governance effects in Indonesia: Provoking land politics or addressing adverse formalisation? (2022, Geoforum)

The researcher often collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including Ira R. Katz, Gerben Nooteboom, Andrew McWilliam, Jodie Trafton, and Kallisse R. Dent.

John F. McCarthy's research appears in a variety of publication venues where they have multiple contributions, such as Psychiatric Services, JAMA Pediatrics, arXiv (Cornell University), Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, and Geoforum.

Best Publications

  • Adsorption and desorption of natural organic matter on iron oxide: mechanisms and models.

    Baohua. Gu;Juergen. Schmitt;Zhihong. Chen;Liyuan. Liang

  • Subsurface transport of contaminants

    John F. McCarthy;John M. Zachara

  • Biomarkers of Environmental Contamination

    John F. McCarthy;Lee R. Shugart

  • Adsorption and desorption of different organic matter fractions on iron oxide

    Baohua Gu;Jürgen Schmitt;Zhihong Chen;Liyuan Liang

  • Mechanisms of dissolved organic carbon adsorption on soil

    P. M. Jardine;J. F. McCarthy;N. L. Weber

  • Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia

    Unknown

  • Indoor Air Quality Handbook

    John D. Spengler;John F. McCarthy;Jonathan M. Samet

  • Interactions between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dissolved humic material: binding and dissociation.

    John F. McCarthy;Braulio D. Jimenez

  • Colloid Transport in the Subsurface

    John F. McCarthy;Larry D. McKay

  • Policy narratives, landholder engagement, and oil palm expansion on the Malaysian and Indonesian frontiers

    Unknown

  • Organic matter in small mesopores in sediments and soils

    Lawrence M. Mayer;Linda L. Schick;Kathleen R. Hardy;Rota Wagai

  • Trajectories of land acquisition and enclosure: development schemes, virtual land grabs, and green acquisitions in Indonesia's Outer Islands

    Unknown

  • The use of bioindicators for assessing the effects of pollutant stress on fish

    S.M. Adams;K.L. Shepard;M.S. Greeley;B.D. Jimenez

  • Reduction in bioavailability to bluegills of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons bound to dissolved humic material

    John F. McCarthy;Braulio D. Jimenez

  • Protection of organic carbon in soil microaggregates via restructuring of aggregate porosity and filling of pores with accumulating organic matter

    John F. McCarthy;Jan Ilavsky;Julie D. Jastrow;Lawrence M. Mayer

  • Decentralization of forest administration in Indonesia: implications for forest sustainability, economic development and community livelihoods

    Unknown

  • Mobility of natural organic matter in a study aquifer

    John F. McCarthy;Thomas M. Williams;Liyuan Liang;Philip M. Jardine

  • Mobilization of transuranic radionuclides from disposal trenches by natural organic matter

    John F McCarthy;Kenneth R Czerwinski;William E Sanford;Philip M Jardine

  • Using reverse osmosis to obtain organic matter from surface and ground waters

    L. Sun;E.M. Perdue;J.F. McCarthy

  • Transport of Naturally Occurring Dissolved Organic Carbon in Laboratory Columns Containing Aquifer Material

    F. M. Dunnivant;P. M. Jardine;D. L. Taylor;J. F. McCarthy

  • Effect of dissolved humic material on accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Structure-activity relationships

    John F. McCarthy;Braulio D. Jimenez;Thelberstine Barbee

  • Effects of XAD-8 fractions of dissolved organic carbon on the sorption and bioavailability of organic micropollutants

    Jussi Kukkonen;John F. McCarthy;Aimo Oikari

  • Dissolved organic macromolecules reduce the uptake of hydrophobic organic contaminants by the gills of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)

    Marsha C. Black;John F. McCarthy

  • Cotransport of cadmium and hexachlorobiphenyl by dissolved organic carbon through columns containing aquifer material

    Frank M. Dunnivant;Philip M. Jardine;David L. Taylor;John F. McCarthy

  • ES&T Features: Subsurface transport of contaminants

    John McCarthy;John Zachara

  • Colloid Transport in the SubsurfacePast, Present, and Future Challenges

    John F. McCarthy;Larry D. McKay

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry D. McKay
Larry D. McKay University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Liyuan Liang
Liyuan Liang Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jie Zhuang
Jie Zhuang University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Anthony V. Palumbo
Anthony V. Palumbo Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Edmund Perfect
Edmund Perfect University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Baohua Gu
Baohua Gu Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Tammo S. Steenhuis
Tammo S. Steenhuis Cornell University
Samuel A. Wickline
Samuel A. Wickline University of South Florida
Josep Mas-Pla
Josep Mas-Pla Catalan Institute for Water Research
Brian K. Richards
Brian K. Richards Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Environmental Sciences can open numerous career opportunities. Many students look for the easiest bachelor degree options to ensure a smooth academic experience. Environmental Science itself often intersects with fields like Geology and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), making degrees in these areas highly relevant.

For those interested in Earth’s physical processes, pursuing geology degrees online offers flexible options without compromising quality. Similarly, GIS programs provide specialized skills in spatial data analysis, which are vital in environmental planning and management. Discovering the best GIS programs ensures access to top-ranked courses that keep pace with technological advancements.

For professionals aiming to advance into leadership or policy roles within environmental agencies or organizations, faster pathways like 1 year MPA programs can be a strategic choice. These programs focus on public administration skills that complement technical expertise in environmental sciences, boosting career potential.

In summary, combining Environmental Sciences with related online degrees can create diverse career pathways, from field research to data management and policy leadership.

Best Scientists Citing John F. McCarthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles