World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jihong Guan

Jihong Guan

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 46 6902 6700 924 918 332 7698

Jihong Guan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jihong Guan between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jihong Guan published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 17 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2025. 83 of the 442 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2025. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 34 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 46 publications
2000 2025

442 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jihong Guan: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 5
2003 5
2004 7
2005 3
2006 5
2007 24
2008 16
2009 34
2010 18
2011 15
2012 24
2013 13
2014 19
2015 19
2016 11
2017 17
2018 15
2019 15
2020 13
2021 17
2022 25
2023 35
2024 37
2025 46
Total 442
Download as CSV

Jihong Guan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jihong Guan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 332–341 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 332 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209 332
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Jihong Guan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jihong Guan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 46
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jihong Guan is affiliated with Tongji University in China and has a substantial publication record primarily in computer science. Their work spans several areas within the field, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence and its applications.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of subfields including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Jihong Guan's research topics reflect diverse interests, notably in:

  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Shuigeng Zhou
  • Wengen Li
  • Yichao Zhang
  • Hanchen Yang
  • Jiaogen Zhou

Jihong Guan has contributed to a variety of prominent publication venues. The most frequent include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bioinformatics
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
  • ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

Selected recent peer-reviewed papers illustrate the breadth of their work:

  • Deep structural clustering for single-cell RNA-seq data jointly through autoencoder and graph neural network (2022) published in Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • Effective drug-target interaction prediction with mutual interaction neural network (2022) published in Bioinformatics
  • FraGAT: a fragment-oriented multi-scale graph attention model for molecular property prediction (2021) published in Bioinformatics
  • Protein Function Prediction Based on PPI Networks: Network Reconstruction vs Edge Enrichment (2021) published in Frontiers in Genetics
  • Video anomaly detection based on spatio-temporal relationships among objects (2023) published in Neurocomputing

Best Publications

  • Improving compound–protein interaction prediction by building up highly credible negative samples

    Hui Liu;Jianjiang Sun;Jihong Guan;Jie Zheng

  • Single-cell trajectories reconstruction, exploration and mapping of omics data with STREAM

    Huidong Chen;Luca Albergante;Luca Albergante;Jonathan Y. Hsu;Jonathan Y. Hsu;Caleb A. Lareau;Caleb A. Lareau

  • A new taxonomy-based protein fold recognition approach based on autocross-covariance transformation

    Qiwen Dong;Shuigeng Zhou;Jihong Guan

  • Boosting compound-protein interaction prediction by deep learning

    Kai Tian;Mingyu Shao;Yang Wang;Jihong Guan

  • PredUs: a web server for predicting protein interfaces using structural neighbors

    Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang;Lei Deng;Markus Fisher;Jihong Guan

  • Exact solution for mean first-passage time on a pseudofractal scale-free web.

    Zhongzhi Zhang;Yi Qi;Shuigeng Zhou;Wenlei Xie

  • Maximal planar scale-free Sierpinski networks with small-world effect and power law strength-degree correlation

    Zhongzhi Zhang;Shuigeng Zhou;Lujun Fang;Jihong Guan

  • Standard random walks and trapping on the Koch network with scale-free behavior and small-world effect.

    Zhongzhi Zhang;Shuigeng Zhou;Wenlei Xie;Lichao Chen

  • MiRenSVM: towards better prediction of microRNA precursors using an ensemble SVM classifier with multi-loop features

    Jiandong Ding;Shuigeng Zhou;Jihong Guan

  • Adapting skyline computation to the MapReduce framework: algorithms and experiments

    Boliang Zhang;Shuigeng Zhou;Jihong Guan

  • Epidemic spreading with nonlinear infectivity in weighted scale-free networks

    Xiangwei Chu;Zhongzhi Zhang;Jihong Guan;Shuigeng Zhou

  • Determining global mean-first-passage time of random walks on Vicsek fractals using eigenvalues of Laplacian matrices.

    Zhongzhi Zhang;Bin Wu;Hongjuan Zhang;Hongjuan Zhang;Shuigeng Zhou

  • DeepCluster: A General Clustering Framework Based on Deep Learning

    Kai Tian;Shuigeng Zhou;Jihong Guan

  • Exact solution of mean geodesic distance for Vicsek fractals

    Zhongzhi Zhang;Shuigeng Zhou;Lichao Chen;Ming Yin

  • Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using an ensemble method

    Lei Deng;Jihong Guan;Qiwen Dong;Shuigeng Zhou

  • A neighborhood-based clustering algorithm

    Shuigeng Zhou;Yue Zhao;Jihong Guan;Joshua Huang

  • Towards effective document clustering: A constrained K-means based approach

    Guobiao Hu;Shuigeng Zhou;Jihong Guan;Xiaohua Hu

  • Conceptual Modeling for Advanced Application Domains

    S. Wang;Yang;K. Tanaka

  • Protein Function Prediction Based on PPI Networks: Network Reconstruction vs Edge Enrichment

    Unknown

  • CloudNMF: a MapReduce implementation of nonnegative matrix factorization for large-scale biological datasets.

    Ruiqi Liao;Yifan Zhang;Jihong Guan;Shuigeng Zhou

  • Inferring new indications for approved drugs via random walk on drug-disease heterogenous networks.

    Hui Liu;Yinglong Song;Jihong Guan;Libo Luo

  • PredHS: a web server for predicting protein–protein interaction hot spots by using structural neighborhood properties

    Lei Deng;Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang;Zhigang Chen;Yang Meng

  • Epidemic spreading in weighted scale-free networks with community structure

    Xiangwei Chu;Jihong Guan;Zhongzhi Zhang;Shuigeng Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Shuigeng Zhou
Shuigeng Zhou Fudan University
Zhongzhi Zhang
Zhongzhi Zhang Fudan University
Hui Liu
Hui Liu China University of Mining and Technology
Jiannong Cao
Jiannong Cao Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Guanrong Chen
Guanrong Chen City University of Hong Kong
Jason D. Buenrostro
Jason D. Buenrostro Harvard University
Man Lung Yiu
Man Lung Yiu Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Aoying Zhou
Aoying Zhou East China Normal University
Martin J. Aryee
Martin J. Aryee Harvard University
Daniel E. Bauer
Daniel E. Bauer Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Computer Science and technology careers grows, online education offers accessible pathways for a wide variety of students. Many top programs today recognize that not all strong candidates have perfect academic records. If you’re searching for a college with low gpa requirements, you’ll find flexible options that value potential alongside prior academic performance.

For those eager to fast-track their careers, consider accredited accelerated CS degree programs, which allow dedicated students to graduate faster and begin working sooner.

Many online learners also explore interdisciplinary areas, merging computer science with fields like sustainability and engineering. If your interests span multiple domains, you might wonder what can you do with an environmental science degree? Career possibilities range from research and consulting to software tools for environmental data analysis.

Additionally, the rapidly growing field of digital infrastructure opens doors for those investigating environmental engineering schools online. Such degrees combine computing expertise with solutions to environmental challenges—creating versatile, in-demand professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Jihong Guan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles