World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
22281
World Ranking
14754
National Ranking
565

Jan H. Kleibeuker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H. Kleibeuker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 400 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jan H. Kleibeuker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H. Kleibeuker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan H. Kleibeuker is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their professional focus centers around research in a clinical and medical academic environment.

Details regarding recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields and subfields of study, main research topics, and awards are not provided in the available data. As such, a comprehensive overview based on these aspects cannot be constructed.

Their association with a prominent medical center suggests involvement in medical research, likely contributing to advancements aligned with the institution's focus on healthcare and clinical studies.

Further specific information about Jan H. Kleibeuker's scientific contributions, research areas, or publication record is not available at this time.

Best Publications

  • Cancer risk in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer diagnosed by mutation analysis.

    HF Vasen;JT Wijnen;FH Menko;JH Kleibeuker

  • Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer.

    JT Wijnen;Hfa Vasen;PM Khan;AH Zwinderman

  • MSH2 mutation carriers are at higher risk of cancer than MLH1 mutation carriers : A study of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families

    H. F.A. Vasen;A. Stormorken;F. H. Menko;F. M. Nagengast

  • Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Causes and consequences

    Robert C. Verdonk;Carlijn I. Buis;Robert J. Porte;Eric J. van der Jagt

  • Red meat and colon cancer: the cytotoxic and hyperproliferative effects of dietary heme.

    A. L. A. Sesink;D. S. M. L. Termont;J. H. Kleibeuker;R. Van Der Meer

  • Decrease in mortality in Lynch syndrome families because of surveillance.

    Andrea E. de Jong;Yvonne M.C. Hendriks;Jan H. Kleibeuker;Sybrand Y. de Boer

  • Association of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-related tumors displaying low microsatellite instability with MSH6 germline mutations.

    Ying Wu;Maran J.W. Berends;Rob G.J. Mensink;Claudia Kempinga

  • Endoscopic regression of Barrett’s oesophagus during omeprazole treatment; a randomised double blind study

    F T M Peters;S Ganesh;E J Kuipers;W J Sluiter

  • Diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori: a prospective evaluation of their accuracy, without selecting a single test as the gold standard.

    J C Thijs;A A van Zwet;W J Thijs;H B Oey

  • Increased risk of fundic gland polyps during long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy.

    Mathilde Jalving;Jan Koornstra;J. Wesseling;Hendrika Boezen

  • Genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 involved in breast cancer susceptibility.

    M M de Jong;I M Nolte;G J te Meerman;W T A van der Graaf

  • Molecular and Clinical Characteristics of MSH6 Variants: An Analysis of 25 Index Carriers of a Germline Variant

    Maran J.W. Berends;Ying Wu;Rolf H. Sijmons;Rob G.J. Mensink

  • Extra-intestinal manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis.

    Emma J. Groen;Annemieke Roos;Friso L. Muntinghe;Roelien H. Enting

  • One to 2-Year Surveillance Intervals Reduce Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Families With Lynch Syndrome

    Hans F.A. Vasen;Mohamed Abdirahman;Richard Brohet;Alexandra M.J. Langers

  • Expression of nitric oxide synthases and formation of nitrotyrosine and reactive oxygen species in inflammatory bowel disease

    G. Dijkstra;H. Moshage;H. M. Van Dullemen;A. De Jager-Krikken

  • Surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a long-term study on 114 families.

    Wouter H de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel;Fokko M Nagengast;Gerrit Griffioen;Fred H Menko

  • PREVALENCE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF NEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODIES IN AUTOIMMUNE LIVER-DISEASES

    A. H. L. Mulder;G. Horst;E. B. Haagsma;P. C. Limburg

  • Management of extracolonic tumours in patients with Lynch syndrome

    Jan J Koornstra;Marian J E Mourits;Rolf H Sijmons;Annemarie M Leliveld

  • The role of mismatch repair gene defects in the development of adenomas in patients with HNPCC.

    Andrea E. De Jong;Hans Morreau;Marjo Van Puijenbroek;Paul H.C. Eilers

  • Germline hypermethylation of MLH1 and EPCAM deletions are a frequent cause of Lynch syndrome.

    Renee C. Niessen;Robert M. W. Hofstra;Helga Westers;Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans F. A. Vasen
Hans F. A. Vasen Leiden University
Rolf H. Sijmons
Rolf H. Sijmons University of Groningen
Harry Hollema
Harry Hollema University Medical Center Groningen
Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
Elisabeth G.E. de Vries University Medical Center Groningen
Robert M.W. Hofstra
Robert M.W. Hofstra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ilja M. Nolte
Ilja M. Nolte University Medical Center Groningen
Juul T. Wijnen
Juul T. Wijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Fred H. Menko
Fred H. Menko Netherlands Cancer Institute
Rinse K. Weersma
Rinse K. Weersma University Medical Center Groningen
Charles H.C.M. Buys
Charles H.C.M. Buys University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens various doors beyond the traditional route of becoming a physician. Many students consider online healthcare degree programs to expand their knowledge and career options. For example, if you’re interested in holistic patient care or preventative health, exploring nutrition degrees online can be valuable. These programs allow you to study diet, wellness, and clinical nutrition remotely, often with flexible schedules.

Accreditation is vital when selecting a program. If your goal is to advance into healthcare management, choose from which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme?. Accredited programs ensure a high standard of education and are widely respected by employers.

There are also flexible pathways for nursing professionals. Some colleges offer online rn-bsn programs without clinicals, allowing registered nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing without on-site clinical requirements.

For advanced nursing roles, fast-track options like the shortest msn to dnp program enable nurses to quickly achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree online.

Best Scientists Citing Jan H. Kleibeuker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles