World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 45 6443 6186 2311 2144 142 7292

James A. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James A. Smith between 1965 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James A. Smith published across 61 years, from 1965 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2005. 7 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2005. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1965 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James A. Smith: publications per year, 1965 to 2025
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 3
1988 3
1989 0
1990 3
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 4
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 7
2003 5
2004 4
2005 14
2006 6
2007 2
2008 5
2009 3
2010 3
2011 5
2012 6
2013 7
2014 7
2015 2
2016 4
2017 3
2018 3
2019 7
2020 9
2021 4
2022 7
2023 1
2024 4
2025 3
Total 156
Download as CSV

James A. Smith publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 142 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 142
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

James A. Smith D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348 45
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

James A. Smith is a researcher affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their primary field of study is Environmental Science, with a total of 34 publications. Within this broad discipline, their work often focuses on Water Science and Technology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main research topics covered by Smith include Child Nutrition and Water Access, Fecal Contamination and Water Quality, Urban Stormwater Management Solutions, Wastewater Treatment and Reuse, Smart Materials for Construction, Adsorption and Biosorption for Pollutant Removal, and Fluoride Effects and Removal.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Smith demonstrate a concentration on water treatment and environmental health issues. Notable publications include:

  • Evaluation of Methylene Blue Sorption onto Low-Cost Biosorbents: Equilibrium, Kinetics, and Thermodynamics, 2020, Journal of Chemistry
  • Green stormwater infrastructure redirects deicing salt from surface water to groundwater, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Modified Crushed Oyster Shells for Fluoride Removal from Water, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Seasonality of drinking water sources and the impact of drinking water source on enteric infections among children in Limpopo, South Africa, 2020, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
  • Green synthesis of AgMgOnHaP nanoparticles supported on chitosan matrix: Defluoridation and antibacterial effects in groundwater, 2020, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

Frequent co-authors in Smith's collaborative network include Charles Burgis, Wuhuan Zhang, Joshua N. Edokpayi, Jamie D. Harris, and Gail M. Hayes. Collaborative work has been published most often in venues such as the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Water, which both house six publications each by Smith, as well as The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Chemistry, and Scientific Reports.

Smith's contributions to environmental science have been recognized through fellowships with professional organizations. They were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1998 and a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • Sustainable colloidal-silver-impregnated ceramic filter for point-of-use water treatment.

    Vinka A Oyanedel-Craver;James A Smith

  • Effect of ten quaternary ammonium cations on tetrachloromethane sorption to clay from water

    James A. Smith;Peter R. Jaffe;Cary T. Chiou

  • Toward Understanding the Efficacy and Mechanism of Opuntia spp. as a Natural Coagulant for Potential Application in Water Treatment

    Sarah M Miller;Ezekiel J Fugate;Vinka Oyanedel Craver;James A Smith

  • Sorption of nonionic organic contaminants to single and dual organic cation bentonites from water.

    James A. Smith;Adina. Galan

  • The effect of natural water conditions on the anti-bacterial performance and stability of silver nanoparticles capped with different polymers.

    Hongyin Zhang;James A. Smith;Vinka Oyanedel-Craver

  • Ceramic Filters Impregnated with Silver Nanoparticles for Point-of-Use Water Treatment in Rural Guatemala

    Erin N. Kallman;Erin N. Kallman;Vinka A. Oyanedel-Craver;Vinka A. Oyanedel-Craver;James A. Smith;James A. Smith

  • Benzene transport through landfill liners containing organophilic bentonite

    James A. Smith;Peter R. Jaffé

  • Incorporation of copper nanoparticles into paper for point-of-use water purification

    Theresa A. Dankovich;James A. Smith

  • Modeling the Desorption of Organic Contaminants from Long-Term Contaminated Soil Using Distributed Mass Transfer Rates

    Teresa B. Culver;Stephen P. Hallisey;Dipak Sahoo;James J. Deitsch

  • Effect of Soil Moisture on the Sorption of Trichloroethene Vapor to Vadose-Zone Soil at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey

    James A. Smith;Cary T. Chiou;James A. Kammer;Daniel E. Kile

  • Nonionic organic solute sorption onto two organobentonites as a function of organic-carbon content.

    Shannon L. Bartelt-Hunt;Susan E. Burns;James A. Smith

  • Challenges to Sustainable Safe Drinking Water: A Case Study of Water Quality and Use across Seasons in Rural Communities in Limpopo Province, South Africa.

    Joshua N. Edokpayi;Elizabeth T. Rogawski;David M. Kahler;Courtney L. Hill

  • Effect of triton x-100 on the rate of trichloroethene desorption from soil to water.

    James J. Deitsch;James A. Smith

  • Comparison of tetrachloromethane sorption to an alkylammonium-clay and an alkyldiammonium-clay

    James A. Smith;Peter R. Jaffe

  • Manmade organic compounds in the surface waters of the United States; a review of current understanding

    James A. Smith;Patrick J. Witkowski;Thomas V. Fusillo

  • Evaluating the Sustainability of Ceramic Filters for Point-of-Use Drinking Water Treatment

    Dianjun Ren;Lisa M. Colosi;James A. Smith

  • Sorption and permeability of gasoline hydrocarbons in organobentonite porous media.

    James A Smith;Shannon L Bartelt-Hunt;Susan E Burns

  • Effect of quaternary ammonium cation loading and pH on heavy metal sorption to Ca bentonite and two organobentonites.

    Vinka A. Oyanedel-Craver;James A. Smith

  • Quantification of bacterial chemotaxis in porous media using magnetic resonance imaging.

    Mira Stone Olson;Roseanne M Ford;James A Smith;Erik J Fernandez

  • Retention and transport of silver nanoparticles in a ceramic porous medium used for point-of-use water treatment.

    Dianjun Ren;James A. Smith

  • Nonionic Organic Solute Sorption to two Organobentonites as a Function of Organic-Carbon Content

    S. L. Bartelt-Hunt;S. E. Burns;J. A. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Shannon L. Bartelt-Hunt
Shannon L. Bartelt-Hunt University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Peter R. Jaffé
Peter R. Jaffé Princeton University
Richard L. Guerrant
Richard L. Guerrant University of Virginia
Cary T. Chiou
Cary T. Chiou National Cheng Kung University
Martin Reinhard
Martin Reinhard Stanford University
Stephen A. Macko
Stephen A. Macko University of Virginia
Julie B. Zimmerman
Julie B. Zimmerman Yale University
David Rekosh
David Rekosh University of Virginia
Marie-Louise Hammarskjold
Marie-Louise Hammarskjold University of Virginia
Mark R. Conaway
Mark R. Conaway University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Many learners seek affordable education options, which is why an online general studies bachelor degree cheap is often a practical starting point. This type of program provides a broad knowledge base, perfect for those wanting flexibility in their academic journey.

For those considering a lighter academic load, some programs are recognized as among the easiest bachelor degree options, allowing students to manage their studies alongside other commitments. These can be beneficial for students balancing work or family while pursuing higher education.

Specialized fields like geology align closely with Environmental Sciences. Pursuing an online geology degree can equip students with expertise in earth systems, which is crucial for roles in environmental consulting, conservation, and resource management.

Another rapidly growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Enrolling in the best gis graduate programs enhances skills in mapping and spatial data analysis, essential for many environmental science careers focused on urban planning, wildlife management, and climate research.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles