World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 79 2851 806 624 20467
Chemistry 77 4052 1283 617 20059

Jack M. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack M. Williams between 1956 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack M. Williams published across 70 years, from 1956 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 1990. 10 of the 757 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1956 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 1990. 1956: 1 publication 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 1 publication 1960: 1 publication 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 2 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 6 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 10 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 7 publications 1974: 7 publications 1975: 9 publications 1976: 17 publications 1977: 20 publications 1978: 25 publications 1979: 29 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 20 publications 1982: 16 publications 1983: 21 publications 1984: 25 publications 1985: 36 publications 1986: 46 publications 1987: 48 publications 1988: 41 publications 1989: 23 publications 1990: 51 publications 1991: 38 publications 1992: 21 publications 1993: 19 publications 1994: 24 publications 1995: 21 publications 1996: 27 publications 1997: 24 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications
1956 2025

757 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack M. Williams: publications per year, 1956 to 2025
Year Publications
1956 1
1957 0
1958 0
1959 1
1960 1
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 1
1965 1
1966 2
1967 4
1968 2
1969 6
1970 4
1971 10
1972 3
1973 7
1974 7
1975 9
1976 17
1977 20
1978 25
1979 29
1980 9
1981 20
1982 16
1983 21
1984 25
1985 36
1986 46
1987 48
1988 41
1989 23
1990 51
1991 38
1992 21
1993 19
1994 24
1995 21
1996 27
1997 24
1998 12
1999 17
2000 5
2001 0
2002 11
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 9
2008 5
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 15
2023 6
2024 7
2025 3
Total 757
Download as CSV

Jack M. Williams publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 610–629 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 624 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723
150–169 835
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766
250–269 726
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99 624
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

Jack M. Williams D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450
44–45 612
46–47 612
48–49 598
50–51 657
52–53 667
54–55 621
56–57 597
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299 79
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jack M. Williams is affiliated with Argonne National Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on Computer Science and Medicine. Within these domains, their work incorporates several subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Political Science and International Relations, and Materials Chemistry.

Their scholarly activity demonstrates engagement with a variety of topics, including:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Spreadsheets and End-User Computing
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques

Williams has a record of publications across diverse venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Endocrine Abstracts
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • BMJ Open
  • International Transactions on Education Technology (ITEE)

Their recent publications illustrate the range of their research interests. Selected papers include:

  • "Randomised trials in maternal and perinatal health in low and middle-income countries from 2010 to 2019: a systematic scoping review," 2022, BMJ Open
  • "LinkingPark: An automatic semantic table interpretation system," 2022, Journal of Web Semantics
  • "A Model-Driven Approach to Developing Scalable Educational Software for Adaptive Learning Environments," 2024, International Transactions on Education Technology (ITEE)
  • "Participatory prompting: a user-centric research method for eliciting AI assistance opportunities in knowledge workflows," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Universal testing for hepatitis B and hepatitis C in the Emergency Department: A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of two urban hospitals in the United Kingdom," 2022, Research Square (Research Square)

Frequent co-authors with whom Williams has collaborated include:

  • Brendan McGurk
  • George Peretz
  • Carina Negreanu
  • Andrew D. Gordon
  • Advait Sarkar

In addition to journal articles and conference papers, Williams has contributed to the academic literature through book publications. One such example is the book published by Oxford University Press titled Blackstone's Guide to the UK Internal Market Act 2020 (2021).

Best Publications

  • A new ambient-pressure organic superconductor, .kappa.-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br, with the highest transition temperature yet observed (inductive onset Tc = 11.6 K, resistive onset = 12.5 K)

    Aravinda M. Kini;Urs Geiser;Hau H. Wang;K. Douglas Carlson

  • From semiconductor-semiconductor transition (42 K) to the highest-Tc organic superconductor, κ-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl (Tc = 12.5 K)

    J.M. Williams;A.M. Kini;H.H. Wang;K.D. Carlson

  • Organic superconductors--new benchmarks.

    Jack M. Williams;Arthur J. Schultz;Urs Geiser;K. Douglas Carlson

  • Rational design of synthetic metal superconductors

    Jack M. Williams;Hau H. Wang;Thomas J. Emge;Urs Geiser

  • Introduction to Synthetic Electrical Conductors

    John R. Ferraro;Jack M. Williams

  • Organic superconductors: structural aspects and design of new materials

    Jack M. Williams;Mark A. Beno;Hau H. Wang;Peter C. W. Leung

  • Organic Superconductors

    Jack M. Williams;John R. Ferraro

  • Ambient-pressure superconductivity at 2.7 K and higher temperatures in derivatives of (BEDT-TTF)2IBr2: synthesis, structure, and detection of superconductivity

    Jack M. Williams;Hau H. Wang;Mark A. Beno;Thomas J. Emge

  • C 13 NMR studies of the normal and superconducting states of the organic superconductor κ-(ET ) 2 Cu[N(CN ) 2 ]Br

    S. M. De Soto;C. P. Slichter;A. M. Kini;H. H. Wang

  • Strain index, lattice softness and superconductivity of organic donor-molecule salts: Crystal and electronic structures of three isostructural salts k-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]X (X=Cl, Br, I)

    Urs Geiser;Arthur J. Schults;Hsien-Hau Wang;Diana M. Watkins

  • Synthetic metals based on bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene (BEDT-TTF): Synthesis, structure, and ambient-pressure superconductivity in (BEDT-TTF)2I3

    Jack M. Williams;T. J. Emge;H. H. Wang;M. A. Beno

  • Low temperature penetration depth of κ-(ET) 2 Cu[N(CN) 2 ]Br and κ-(ET) 2 Cu(NCS) 2

    A. Carrington;A. Carrington;I. J. Bonalde;R. Prozorov;Russell W Giannetta

  • Superconductivity at 2.8 K and 1.5 kbar in .kappa.-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3: the first organic superconductor containing a polymeric copper cyanide anion

    Urs. Geiser;Hau H. Wang;K. Douglas. Carlson;Jack M. Williams

  • Superconductivity at 5.2 K in an Electron Donor Radical Salt of Bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene (BEDT-TTF) with the Novel Polyfluorinated Organic Anion SF5CH2CF2SO3-

    Urs Geiser;John A. Schlueter;H. Hau Wang;Aravinda M. Kini

  • Weak ferromagnetism in κ-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, where ET is bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene

    U. Welp;S. Fleshler;W. K. Kwok;G. W. Crabtree

  • A new ambient-pressure organic superconductor: (BEDT-TTF)2(NH4)Hg(SCN)4

    Hsien-Hau Wang;K. D. Carlson;U. Geiser;W. K. Kwok

  • Role of the intermolecular interactions in the two-dimensional ambient-pressure organic superconductors. beta. -(ET)/sub 2/I/sub 3/ and. beta. -(ET)/sub 2/IBr/sub 2/

    Myung Hwan Whangbo;Jack M. Williams;Peter C. W. Leung;Mark A. Beno

  • Ambient-pressure superconductivity at the highest temperature (5 K) observed in an organic system: β-(BEDT-TTF)2AuI2

    Hau H. Wang;Mark A. Beno;Urs Geiser;Millicent A. Firestone

  • Ion implantation and thermal annealing of α‐Al2O3 single crystals

    H. Naramoto;C. W. White;J. M. Williams;C. J. McHargue

  • Importance of Intermolecular Hydrogen—Hydrogen And Hydrogen-anion Contacts For The Lattice Softness, The Electron-phonon Coupling, And The Superconducting Transition Temperatures, T c , of Organic Conducting Salts β-(et) 2 x (x- = Ibr 2 -, aui2”, I 3 )

    Myung Hwan Whangbo;Jack M. Williams;Arthur J. Schultz;Thomas J. Emge

Frequent Co-Authors

Urs Geiser
Urs Geiser Argonne National Laboratory
Myung-Hwan Whangbo
Myung-Hwan Whangbo North Carolina State University
G. W. Crabtree
G. W. Crabtree Argonne National Laboratory
John R. Ferraro
John R. Ferraro Argonne National Laboratory
Ulrich Welp
Ulrich Welp Argonne National Laboratory
Jeffrey L. Petersen
Jeffrey L. Petersen West Virginia University
Earl L. Muetterties
Earl L. Muetterties Cornell University
Galen D. Stucky
Galen D. Stucky University of California, Santa Barbara
Martin Dressel
Martin Dressel University of Stuttgart
Juan J. Novoa
Juan J. Novoa University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jack M. Williams

Recently Published Articles