World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 37 8813 8455 3157 2935 112 6833

J. Elliott Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. Elliott Campbell between 1950 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. Elliott Campbell published across 75 years, from 1950 to 2024, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2013. 2 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2013. 1950: 1 publication 1951: 0 publications 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 2 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 2 publications 1957: 1 publication 1958: 2 publications 1959: 5 publications 1960: 6 publications 1961: 6 publications 1962: 5 publications 1963: 3 publications 1964: 5 publications 1965: 2 publications 1966: 3 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 4 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1950 2024

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. Elliott Campbell: publications per year, 1950 to 2024
Year Publications
1950 1
1951 0
1952 1
1953 0
1954 2
1955 0
1956 2
1957 1
1958 2
1959 5
1960 6
1961 6
1962 5
1963 3
1964 5
1965 2
1966 3
1967 4
1968 4
1969 4
1970 2
1971 3
1972 2
1973 2
1974 0
1975 2
1976 2
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 3
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 4
2008 6
2009 6
2010 4
2011 3
2012 12
2013 18
2014 5
2015 12
2016 8
2017 8
2018 5
2019 4
2020 6
2021 8
2022 2
2023 1
2024 1
Total 205
Download as CSV

J. Elliott Campbell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Elliott Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 112 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 112
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

J. Elliott Campbell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Elliott Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267 37
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

J. Elliott Campbell is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and renewable energy.

The scientist's recent publications span various topics related to environmental dynamics and sustainability. Notable papers include:

  • Energy production and water savings from floating solar photovoltaics on global reservoirs (2023, Nature Sustainability)
  • Energy and water co-benefits from covering canals with solar panels (2021, Nature Sustainability)
  • Global Atmospheric OCS Trend Analysis From 22 NDACC Stations (2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)
  • Response to Comments on "Recent global decline of CO 2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis" (2021, Science)
  • Quantifying the Farmland Application of Compost to Help Meet California's Organic Waste Diversion Law (2020, Environmental Science & Technology)

Campbell's work frequently appears in journals such as Nature Sustainability and Environmental Science & Technology, with other contributions in Science and the Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

The researcher collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Brandi McKuin
  • Brendan P. Harrison
  • Yubin Jin
  • Shijie Hu
  • Alan D. Ziegler

Their main fields of study revolve around environmental science, particularly focusing on subfields like global and planetary change, atmospheric science, industrial and manufacturing engineering, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, and nature and landscape conservation.

Main topics of Campbell's work include atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, fish ecology and management studies, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, climate variability and models, municipal solid waste management, environmental justice and health disparities, and solar thermal and photovoltaic systems.

Best Publications

  • Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource.

    Christopher B. Field;J. Elliott Campbell;David B. Lobell

  • The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands.

    J Elliott Campbell;David B Lobell;Robert C Genova;Christopher B Field

  • Greater transportation energy and GHG offsets from bioelectricity than ethanol

    J. E. Campbell;D. B. Lobell;C. B. Field

  • A coupled model of the global cycles of carbonyl sulfide and CO2: A possible new window on the carbon cycle

    Joe Berry;Adam Wolf;J. Elliott Campbell;Ian Baker

  • Production of Biodiesel and Biogas from Algae: A Review of Process Train Options

    Patrick E. Wiley;J. Elliott Campbell;Brandi McKuin

  • Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles

    Mary E. Whelan;Mary E. Whelan;Sinikka T. Lennartz;Teresa E. Gimeno;Richard Wehr

  • Carbon isotopes for estimating soil decomposition and physical mixing in well-drained forest soils

    Peter M. Acton;James F. Fox;J. Elliott Campbell;Harry D. Rowe

  • Energy and water co-benefits from covering canals with solar panels

    Brandi L McKuin;Brandi L McKuin;Andrew Zumkehr;Jenny Ta;Roger Bales

  • Historical U.S. cropland areas and the potential for bioenergy production on abandoned croplands.

    Unknown

  • Increased estimates of air-pollution emissions from Brazilian sugar-cane ethanol

    C. C. Tsao;J. E. Campbell;M. Mena-Carrasco

  • Global bioenergy potential from high-lignin agricultural residue

    Venugopal Mendu;Tom Shearin;J. Elliott Campbell;Jozsef Stork

  • When renewable portfolio standards meet cap-and-trade regulations in the electricity sector: Market interactions, profits implications, and policy redundancy

    C.-C. Tsao;J.E. Campbell;Yihsu Chen

  • Carbonyl sulfide exchange in soils for better estimates of ecosystem carbon uptake

    Mary E. Whelan;Mary E. Whelan;Timothy W. Hilton;Joseph A. Berry;Max Berkelhammer

  • Cosmic ray induced neutron background sources and fluxes for geometries of air over water, ground, iron, and aluminum

    Unknown

  • Global gridded anthropogenic emissions inventory of carbonyl sulfide

    Andrew Zumkehr;Tim W. Hilton;Mary Whelan;Steve Smith

  • Estimating the health benefits from natural gas use in transport and heating in Santiago, Chile.

    Marcelo Mena-Carrasco;Estefania Oliva;Pablo Saide;N Scott

  • Tropical sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide observed from space

    N. Glatthor;M. Höpfner;I. T. Baker;J. Berry

  • Estimate of carbonyl sulfide tropical oceanic surface fluxes using Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer observations

    Le Kuai;John R. Worden;J. Elliott Campbell;Susan S. Kulawik

  • Growing season eddy covariance measurements of carbonyl sulfide and CO2 fluxes: COS and CO2 relationships in Southern Great Plains winter wheat

    D.P. Billesbach;J.A. Berry;U. Seibt;K. Maseyk

  • Vertical profiles of biospheric and fossil fuel-derived CO2 and fossil fuel CO2: CO ratios from airborne measurements of Δ14C, CO2 and CO above Colorado, USA

    Heather D. Graven;Britton B. Stephens;Thomas P. Guilderson;Thomas P. Guilderson;Teresa L. Campos

  • The potential for local croplands to meet US food demand

    Andrew Zumkehr;J Elliott Campbell

  • Peak growing season gross uptake of carbon in North America is largest in the Midwest USA

    Timothy W. Hilton;Mary E. Whelan;Mary E. Whelan;Andrew Zumkehr;Sarika Kulkarni

  • Assessing the regional impacts of Mexico City emissions on air quality and chemistry

    M. Mena-Carrasco;M. Mena-Carrasco;G. R. Carmichael;J. E. Campbell;D. Zimmerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph A. Berry
Joseph A. Berry Carnegie Institution for Science
Stephen A. Montzka
Stephen A. Montzka National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Lara M. Kueppers
Lara M. Kueppers Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Philippe Peylin
Philippe Peylin Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ian Baker
Ian Baker Colorado State University
David B. Lobell
David B. Lobell Stanford University
Christopher B. Field
Christopher B. Field Stanford University
Fabienne Maignan
Fabienne Maignan French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many turn to programs recognized as the easiest bachelor's degree options to balance rigorous study with manageable course loads.

Geoscience and geology are closely connected fields, with top-tier programs readily available. Investigating the best online geology degree offerings allows students to study Earth processes and natural resources comprehensively, enhancing their understanding of environmental systems.

Specializing in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be especially advantageous in an environmentally focused career. Many students seek out the best GIS schools to develop skills in spatial data analysis, an essential tool in environmental planning and management.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy or work in public administration, a graduate degree like an MPA is valuable. Exploring mpa one year programs enables professionals to fast-track their education and impact sustainable development initiatives effectively.

Best Scientists Citing J. Elliott Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles