World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
33396
World Ranking
2514
National Ranking
1254

J. D. Tygar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. D. Tygar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

J. D. Tygar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. D. Tygar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. D. Tygar is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. The existing data does not list specific papers published by Tygar, nor does it indicate frequent co-authors or particular publication venues associated with their work.

Due to the absence of detailed information on research topics, Tygar's main fields of study and subfields cannot be specified. Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards won available for this scientist.

The profile highlights the affiliation with a leading research institution, which often involves engagement in various academic activities, including research, teaching, and collaboration. However, without additional details, the scope and focus of Tygar's contributions in science remain unspecified here.

Best Publications

  • SPINS: security protocols for sensor networks

    Adrian Perrig;Robert Szewczyk;J. D. Tygar;Victor Wen

  • SPINS: security protocols for sensor networks

    Adrian Perrig;Robert Szewczyk;Victor Wen;David Culler

  • Why phishing works

    Rachna Dhamija;J. D. Tygar;Marti Hearst

  • Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0

    Alma Whitten;J. D. Tygar

  • Efficient authentication and signing of multicast streams over lossy channels

    A. Perrig;R. Canetti;J.D. Tygar;Dawn Song

  • Adversarial machine learning

    L Huang;AD Joseph;B Nelson;Bip Rubinstein

  • The TESLA Broadcast Authentication Protocol

    Adrian Perrig;Ran Canetti;J. D. Tygar;Dawn Song

  • Can machine learning be secure

    Marco Barreno;Blaine Nelson;Russell Sears;Anthony D. Joseph

  • The security of machine learning

    Marco Barreno;Blaine Nelson;Anthony D. Joseph;J. D. Tygar

  • Efficient and Secure Source Authentication for Multicast.

    Adrian Perrig;Ran Canetti;Dawn Xiaodong Song;J. D. Tygar

  • The battle against phishing: Dynamic Security Skins

    Rachna Dhamija;J. D. Tygar

  • Method and apparatus for purchasing and delivering digital goods over a network

    Marvin A. Sirbu;J. D. Tygar;Benjamin T. H. Cox;Thomas Wagner

  • NetBill: an Internet commerce system optimized for network-delivered services

    M. Sirbu;J.D. Tygar

  • NetBill security and transaction protocol

    Benjamin Cox;J. D. Tygar;Marvin Sirbu

  • ELK, a new protocol for efficient large-group key distribution

    A. Penrig;D. Song;D. Tygar

  • Keyboard acoustic emanations revisited

    Li Zhuang;Feng Zhou;J. D. Tygar

  • ANTIDOTE: understanding and defending against poisoning of anomaly detectors

    Benjamin I.P. Rubinstein;Blaine Nelson;Ling Huang;Anthony D. Joseph

  • Dyad : a system for using physically secure coprocessors

    J. D. Tygar;Bennet S. Yee

  • Exploiting machine learning to subvert your spam filter

    Blaine Nelson;Marco Barreno;Fuching Jack Chi;Anthony D. Joseph

  • Secure coprocessors in electronic commerce applications

    Bennet Yee;J. D. Tygar

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony D. Joseph
Anthony D. Joseph University of California, Berkeley
Ling Huang
Ling Huang Intel (United States)
Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein
Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein University of Melbourne
Adrian Perrig
Adrian Perrig ETH Zurich
Satish Rao
Satish Rao University of California, Berkeley
Sean W. Smith
Sean W. Smith Dartmouth College
Jeannette M. Wing
Jeannette M. Wing Columbia University
Dawn Song
Dawn Song University of California, Berkeley
Nina Taft
Nina Taft Google (United States)
Ran Canetti
Ran Canetti Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, there are a variety of flexible online degree options and career paths to consider. Many schools now offer accelerated computer science degree online programs that allow you to fast-track your education and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal if you want to learn at your own pace or balance studies with other commitments.

Admission criteria vary widely, but don’t be discouraged if your grades are not perfect. You can find a college that accepts low gpa, making higher education more accessible for everyone.

Beyond core computer science, consider interdisciplinary fields. For example, those passionate about environmental issues may find a future in technology-driven sustainability by pursuing a degree in environmental sciences. Discover what can you do with an environmental science degree, as well as the cheapest online environmental science degree options to keep your academic journey affordable.

Exploring these alternative online pathways can open doors to emerging careers and make your education more flexible and budget-friendly.

Best Scientists Citing J. D. Tygar

Trending Scientists