World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
37612
World Ranking
2981
National Ranking
1461

Jeannette M. Wing publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeannette M. Wing sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeannette M. Wing D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeannette M. Wing sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - ACM Distinguished Service Award For her advocacy of "computational thinking," her leadership of the Computing and Information Science & Engineering directorate of the US National Science Foundation, and for drawing new and diverse audiences to the field of computer science.
  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2003 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to methods for software systems.
  • 1998 - ACM Fellow For fundamental contributions to formal methods, programming languages, and programming methodology, and for promoting the use of formal methods in software development.

Overview

Jeannette M. Wing is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and works primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research focuses extensively on Artificial Intelligence, with additional work in Safety Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Health Informatics.

Their scholarly output includes publications in various venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Harvard Data Science Review
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Public health reviews

Jeannette M. Wing's key topics of research cover several areas, including:

  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Ethics in Clinical Research

Their recent papers include:

  • "Trustworthy AI" (2021), published in Communications of the ACM
  • "Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI" (2024), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The Emergence and Future of Public Health Data Science" (2021), published in Public health reviews
  • "Ensuring Fairness Beyond the Training Data" (2020), published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems" (2024), published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Jeannette M. Wing include:

  • Alfred Z. Spector
  • Peter Norvig
  • Chris H. Wiggins
  • Wolfgang Blau
  • Vinton G. Cerf

In addition to journal articles and conference papers, Jeannette M. Wing has contributed to book literature, notably with a publication in Cambridge University Press titled Data Science in Context (2022).

Their work has been recognized with several awards and honors, such as:

  • ACM Distinguished Service Award (2014) for advocacy of computational thinking and leadership roles
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2010)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2007)
  • IEEE Fellow (2003) for contributions to software systems methods
  • ACM Fellow (1998) for contributions to formal methods, programming languages, and programming methodology

Best Publications

  • Computational thinking

    Jeannette M. Wing

  • Linearizability: a correctness condition for concurrent objects

    Maurice P. Herlihy;Jeannette M. Wing

  • Computational thinking and thinking about computing

    J. Wing

  • Formal methods: state of the art and future directions

    Edmund M. Clarke;Jeannette M. Wing

  • Automated generation and analysis of attack graphs

    O. Sheyner;J. Haines;S. Jha;R. Lippmann

  • A behavioral notion of subtyping

    Barbara H. Liskov;Jeannette M. Wing

  • A specifier's introduction to formal methods

    J.M. Wing

  • Specification matching of software components

    Amy Moormann Zaremski;Jeannette M. Wing

  • An Attack Surface Metric

    P K Manadhata;J M Wing

  • Two formal analyses of attack graphs

    S. Jha;O. Sheyner;J. Wing

  • Game strategies in network security

    Kong-Wei Lye;Jeannette M. Wing

  • Tools for generating and analyzing attack graphs

    Oleg Sheyner;Jeannette Wing

  • Signature matching: a tool for using software libraries

    Amy Moormann Zaremski;Jeannette M. Wing

  • The Larch Family of Specification Languages

    J.V. Guttag;J.J. Horning;J.M. Wing

  • Measuring Relative Attack Surfaces

    Michael Howard;Jon Pincus;Jeannette Marie. Wing

  • Ranking attack graphs

    Vaibhav Mehta;Constantinos Bartzis;Haifeng Zhu;Edmund Clarke

  • Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all

    Jeannette M. Wing

  • Axioms for concurrent objects

    M. P. Herlihy;J. M. Wing

  • Scenario graphs and attack graphs

    Oleg Mikhail Sheyner;Jeannette Wing

  • An Invitation to Formal Methods

    J.P. Bowen;R.W. Butler;D.L. Dill;R.L. Glass

Frequent Co-Authors

Desney S. Tan
Desney S. Tan Microsoft (United States)
Andrew D. Wilson
Andrew D. Wilson Microsoft (United States)
Anupam Datta
Anupam Datta Carnegie Mellon University
Maurice Herlihy
Maurice Herlihy Brown University
Clarence T. Tegreene
Clarence T. Tegreene Microsoft (United States)
Victoria Y. H. Wood
Victoria Y. H. Wood Microsoft (United States)
Jordin T. Kare
Jordin T. Kare Microsoft (United States)
Charles Whitmer
Charles Whitmer Microsoft (United States)
Roderick A. Hyde
Roderick A. Hyde Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can expand your career opportunities beyond a traditional Computer Science program. Many students are seeking flexible and affordable education options. If you’re looking to advance your expertise without a hefty price tag, check out cheap doctoral programs available online. These programs offer a path to the highest academic achievement while keeping costs in check.

For those interested in education leadership, 1 year edd programs online provide an accelerated route to a doctorate in education. These fast-track programs can help you quickly qualify for top roles in educational institutions or tech training departments.

If you want to get started in the tech field quickly, you might consider enrolling in the best associate degree in 6 months online. These short-term programs are ideal for acquiring foundational skills and entering the workforce faster.

Additionally, for those aiming for leadership or management roles, pursuing the best online business management degree can complement your technical skills and prepare you for broader career paths in technology businesses.

Best Scientists Citing Jeannette M. Wing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles