World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
13058
World Ranking
6063
National Ranking
98

Egon Willighagen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Egon Willighagen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 431 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Egon Willighagen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Egon Willighagen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Egon Willighagen is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research output is primarily within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Molecular Biology as a subfield. Additional areas of study include Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's recent publications span various topics and venues. Notable papers include:

  • "WikiPathways: connecting communities" (2020) published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "The LOTUS initiative for open knowledge management in natural products research" (2022) published in eLife
  • "WikiPathways 2024: next generation pathway database" (2023) published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Artificial intelligence for natural product drug discovery" (2023) published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
  • "COVID-19 Disease Map, building a computational repository of SARS-CoV-2 virus-host interaction mechanisms" (2020) published in Scientific Data

Their research topics cover a range of themes including Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Research Data Management Practices, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Computational Drug Discovery Methods, Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, and Semantic Web and Ontologies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Egon Willighagen are:

  • Chris T. Evelo (41 publications)
  • Martina Kutmon (29 publications)
  • Marvin Martens (25 publications)
  • Nina Jeliazkova (18 publications)
  • Ammar Ammar (17 publications)

Their work is regularly published in several key venues, including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 51 publications
  • Journal of Cheminformatics with 9 publications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 8 publications
  • Scientific Data with 7 publications
  • Toxicology Letters with 6 publications

Best Publications

  • The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An open-source Java library for chemo- and bioinformatics

    Christoph Steinbeck;Yongquan Han;Stefan Kuhn;Oliver Horlacher

  • WikiPathways : a multifaceted pathway database bridging metabolomics to other omics research

    Denise Slenter;Martina Kutmon;Kristina Hanspers;Anders Riutta

  • WikiPathways: connecting communities.

    Marvin Martens;Ammar Ammar;Anders Riutta;Andra Waagmeester

  • Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK) - an open-source java library for chemo- and bioinformatics

    Christoph Steinbeck;Christian Hoppe;Stefan Kuhn;Matteo Floris

  • The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) v2.0: atom typing, depiction, molecular formulas, and substructure searching

    Egon L. Willighagen;John W. Mayfield;Jonathan Alvarsson;Arvid Berg

  • The Blue Obelisk—Interoperability in Chemical Informatics

    Rajarshi Guha;Michael T. Howard;Geoffrey R. Hutchison;Peter Murray-Rust

  • WikiPathways: capturing the full diversity of pathway knowledge.

    Martina Kutmon;Anders Riutta;Nuno Nunes;Kristina Hanspers

  • The LOTUS initiative for open knowledge management in natural products research

    Unknown

  • FAIR principles : interpretations and implementation considerations

    Annika Jacobsen;Ricardo de Miranda Azevedo;Nick S. Juty;Dominique Batista

  • Adverse outcome pathways: opportunities, limitations and open questions.

    Marcel Leist;Ahmed Ghallab;Ahmed Ghallab;Rabea Graepel;Rosemarie Marchan

  • Open PHACTS: Semantic interoperability for drug discovery

    Antony J. Williams;Lee Harland;Paul Groth;Stephen Pettifer

  • Artificial intelligence for natural product drug discovery

    Unknown

  • WikiPathways 2024: next generation pathway database

    Unknown

  • OSCAR4: a flexible architecture for chemical text-mining

    David M Jessop;Sam E Adams;Egon L Willighagen;Lezan Hawizy

  • Linked open drug data for pharmaceutical research and development

    Matthias Samwald;Matthias Samwald;Matthias Samwald;Anja Jentzsch;Christopher Bouton;Claus Stie Kallesøe

  • The Chemical Translation Service—a web-based tool to improve standardization of metabolomic reports

    Gert Wohlgemuth;Pradeep Kumar Haldiya;Egon L. Willighagen;Tobias Kind

  • Bioclipse: an open source workbench for chemo- and bioinformatics

    Ola Spjuth;Tobias Helmus;Egon L Willighagen;Stefan Kuhn

  • COVID-19 Disease Map, building a computational repository of SARS-CoV-2 virus-host interaction mechanisms.

    Marek Ostaszewski;Alexander Mazein;Alexander Mazein;Marc E. Gillespie;Marc E. Gillespie;Inna Kuperstein

  • The ChEMBL database as linked open data

    Egon L Willighagen;Andra Waagmeester;Ola Spjuth;Peter Ansell

  • PubChemRDF: towards the semantic annotation of PubChem compound and substance databases

    Gang Fu;Colin R. Batchelor;Michel Dumontier;Janna Hastings

  • The eNanoMapper database for nanomaterial safety information

    Nina Jeliazkova;Charalampos Chomenidis;Philip Doganis;Bengt Fadeel

  • Wikidata as a knowledge graph for the life sciences.

    Andra Waagmeester;Gregory Stupp;Sebastian Burgstaller-Muehlbacher;Benjamin M Good

  • The Chemical Information Ontology: Provenance and Disambiguation for Chemical Data on the Biological Semantic Web

    Janna Hastings;Leonid Chepelev;Egon Willighagen;Nico Adams;Nico Adams

  • Scholia, Scientometrics and Wikidata

    Finn Årup Nielsen;Daniel Mietchen;Egon L. Willighagen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ola Spjuth
Ola Spjuth Uppsala University
Christoph Steinbeck
Christoph Steinbeck Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Haralambos Sarimveis
Haralambos Sarimveis National Technical University of Athens
Roland C. Grafström
Roland C. Grafström Karolinska Institute
Alexander R. Pico
Alexander R. Pico Gladstone Institutes
Carole Goble
Carole Goble University of Manchester
Antony J. Williams
Antony J. Williams Environmental Protection Agency
Rajarshi Guha
Rajarshi Guha Google (United States)
Janna Hastings
Janna Hastings University College London
Jarl E. S. Wikberg
Jarl E. S. Wikberg Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Computer Science opens doors to many complementary online programs and career pathways. For those interested in information security, online cybersecurity master's programs offer specialized knowledge to prepare graduates for high-demand roles. Cybersecurity overlaps with computer science and is crucial as businesses rely more on digital infrastructure.

If you’re inclined towards the intersection of technology and industry, a construction management degree online cost can provide insights into both technical and managerial aspects, expanding your options beyond traditional IT roles.

Another pathway is criminal justice, an area increasingly shaped by digital technology. It's important to compare the cost of criminal justice degree programs online while considering how their curriculum incorporates crime analytics, cybersecurity, and digital forensics.

For those interested in finance and technology, an accredited online accounting degree can complement computer science skills—opening opportunities in data analysis, financial software, and fintech.

Whether pursuing a specialized or interdisciplinary field, online degrees in these areas offer flexible, affordable pathways to build a robust and future-proof career.

Best Scientists Citing Egon Willighagen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles