World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 39 9557 9281 593 585 145 9955

Janna Hastings publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janna Hastings between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janna Hastings published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2025. 64 of the 253 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 34 publications
2007 2025

253 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janna Hastings: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 6
2011 19
2012 22
2013 13
2014 7
2015 12
2016 9
2017 5
2018 4
2019 12
2020 18
2021 13
2022 16
2023 28
2024 30
2025 34
Total 253
Download as CSV

Janna Hastings publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janna Hastings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 145
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Janna Hastings D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janna Hastings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 39
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janna Hastings is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their work spans interdisciplinary fields including Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on applied research intersecting health and technology.

The scientist's main fields of study are:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, their research covers several subfields, notably:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • General Health Professions
  • Applied Psychology
  • Health Informatics

The primary topics of their work include:

  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Topic Modeling

Janna Hastings has published research in various venues. The most frequent publication sources are:

  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Addiction

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Hastings include:

  • "The Behaviour Change Technique Ontology: Transforming the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1," 2023, Wellcome Open Research
  • "Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology," 2021, Wellcome Open Research
  • "Introducing the Open Energy Ontology: Enhancing data interpretation and interfacing in energy systems analysis," 2021, Energy and AI
  • "Delivering Behaviour Change Interventions: Development of a Mode of Delivery Ontology," 2021, Wellcome Open Research
  • "Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology," 2020, Wellcome Open Research

Janna Hastings has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by University of Exeter Press eBooks:

  • "Mental Health Ontologies," 2020

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as:

  • Susan Michie
  • Robert West
  • Martin Glauer
  • Marie Johnston
  • Alison J. Wright

Best Publications

  • ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy

    Yannick Djoumbou Feunang;Roman Eisner;Craig Knox;Leonid Chepelev

  • ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest

    Kirill Degtyarenko;Paula de Matos;Marcus Ennis;Janna Hastings

  • ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites.

    Janna Hastings;Gareth Owen;Adriano Dekker;Marcus Ennis

  • MetaboLights—an open-access general-purpose repository for metabolomics studies and associated meta-data

    Kenneth Haug;Reza M. Salek;Pablo Conesa;Janna Hastings

  • The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013

    Janna Hastings;Paula de Matos;Adriano Dekker;Marcus Ennis

  • Chemical Entities of Biological Interest: an update

    Paula de Matos;Rafael Alcántara;Adriano Dekker;Marcus Ennis

  • Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology

    Mélanie Courtot;Nick Juty;Christian Knüpfer;Dagmar Waltemath

  • UniChem: a unified chemical structure cross-referencing and identifier tracking system.

    Jon Chambers;Mark Davies;Anna Gaulton;Anne Hersey

  • Identifiers for the 21st century : How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data

    Julie A. McMurry;Nick Juty;Niklas Blomberg;Tony Burdett

  • The Behaviour Change Technique Ontology: Transforming the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1

    Unknown

  • The ChEMBL database as linked open data

    Egon L Willighagen;Andra Waagmeester;Ola Spjuth;Peter Ansell

  • PubChemRDF: towards the semantic annotation of PubChem compound and substance databases

    Gang Fu;Colin R. Batchelor;Michel Dumontier;Janna Hastings

  • The eNanoMapper database for nanomaterial safety information

    Nina Jeliazkova;Charalampos Chomenidis;Philip Doganis;Bengt Fadeel

  • Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way

    Philippe Rocca-Serra;Reza M. Salek;Masanori Arita;Elon Correa

  • The Chemical Information Ontology: Provenance and Disambiguation for Chemical Data on the Biological Semantic Web

    Janna Hastings;Leonid Chepelev;Egon Willighagen;Nico Adams;Nico Adams

  • A scoping review of ontologies related to human behaviour change.

    Emma Norris;Ailbhe N Finnerty;Janna Hastings;Gillian Stokes

  • eNanoMapper: harnessing ontologies to enable data integration for nanomaterial risk assessment

    Janna Hastings;Nina Jeliazkova;Gareth Owen;Georgia Tsiliki

  • Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology.

    Susan Michie;Robert West;Ailbhe N. Finnerty;Emma Norris

  • Delivering Behaviour Change Interventions: Development of a Mode of Delivery Ontology.

    Marta M. Marques;Rachel N. Carey;Emma Norris;Fiona Evans

  • Dovetailing biology and chemistry: integrating the Gene Ontology with the ChEBI chemical ontology

    David P Hill;Nico Adams;Nico Adams;Nico Adams;Mike Bada;Colin Batchelor

  • The MetaboLights repository: curation challenges in metabolomics

    Reza M. Salek;Kenneth Haug;Pablo Conesa;Janna Hastings

  • Structure-based Classification and Ontology in Chemistry

    Janna Hastings;Janna Hastings;Despoina Magka;Colin R. Batchelor;Lian Duan;Lian Duan

  • Multi-Omics and Genome-Scale Modeling Reveal a Metabolic Shift During C. elegans Aging

    Janna Hastings;Abraham Mains;Bhupinder Virk;Nicolas Rodriguez

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Steinbeck
Christoph Steinbeck Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Stefan Schulz
Stefan Schulz Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Robert West
Robert West University College London
Marta M. Marques
Marta M. Marques Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública
Egon Willighagen
Egon Willighagen Maastricht University
Michel Dumontier
Michel Dumontier Maastricht University
Nicolas Le Novère
Nicolas Le Novère Babraham Institute
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen
Barry Smith
Barry Smith University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree online offers flexibility and access to diverse career options. Students can choose from the computer science degree online programs, which allow for accelerated learning and the ability to fit studies around personal schedules.

Cost is often a major concern. Fortunately, there are many affordable online colleges that provide quality education without overwhelming student debt. For those worried about past academic performance, several college with low gpa options consider a holistic admissions approach, making it possible to start or continue your education regardless of earlier challenges.

A background in computer science also opens doors to interdisciplinary fields. For instance, with the increasing focus on sustainability and technology, you can explore what can you do with an environmental science degree and merge computer science skills with environmental problem-solving. These pathways allow students to align studies with evolving job markets and personal passions.

Best Scientists Citing Janna Hastings

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles