World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
9955
World Ranking
9557
National Ranking
593

Janna Hastings publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janna Hastings sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Janna Hastings D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janna Hastings sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janna Hastings is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their work spans interdisciplinary fields including Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on applied research intersecting health and technology.

The scientist's main fields of study are:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, their research covers several subfields, notably:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • General Health Professions
  • Applied Psychology
  • Health Informatics

The primary topics of their work include:

  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Topic Modeling

Janna Hastings has published research in various venues. The most frequent publication sources are:

  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Addiction

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Hastings include:

  • "The Behaviour Change Technique Ontology: Transforming the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1," 2023, Wellcome Open Research
  • "Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology," 2021, Wellcome Open Research
  • "Introducing the Open Energy Ontology: Enhancing data interpretation and interfacing in energy systems analysis," 2021, Energy and AI
  • "Delivering Behaviour Change Interventions: Development of a Mode of Delivery Ontology," 2021, Wellcome Open Research
  • "Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology," 2020, Wellcome Open Research

Janna Hastings has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by University of Exeter Press eBooks:

  • "Mental Health Ontologies," 2020

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as:

  • Susan Michie
  • Robert West
  • Martin Glauer
  • Marie Johnston
  • Alison J. Wright

Best Publications

  • ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy

    Yannick Djoumbou Feunang;Roman Eisner;Craig Knox;Leonid Chepelev

  • ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest

    Kirill Degtyarenko;Paula de Matos;Marcus Ennis;Janna Hastings

  • ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites.

    Janna Hastings;Gareth Owen;Adriano Dekker;Marcus Ennis

  • MetaboLights—an open-access general-purpose repository for metabolomics studies and associated meta-data

    Kenneth Haug;Reza M. Salek;Pablo Conesa;Janna Hastings

  • The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013

    Janna Hastings;Paula de Matos;Adriano Dekker;Marcus Ennis

  • Chemical Entities of Biological Interest: an update

    Paula de Matos;Rafael Alcántara;Adriano Dekker;Marcus Ennis

  • Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology

    Mélanie Courtot;Nick Juty;Christian Knüpfer;Dagmar Waltemath

  • UniChem: a unified chemical structure cross-referencing and identifier tracking system.

    Jon Chambers;Mark Davies;Anna Gaulton;Anne Hersey

  • Identifiers for the 21st century : How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data

    Julie A. McMurry;Nick Juty;Niklas Blomberg;Tony Burdett

  • The Behaviour Change Technique Ontology: Transforming the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1

    Unknown

  • The ChEMBL database as linked open data

    Egon L Willighagen;Andra Waagmeester;Ola Spjuth;Peter Ansell

  • PubChemRDF: towards the semantic annotation of PubChem compound and substance databases

    Gang Fu;Colin R. Batchelor;Michel Dumontier;Janna Hastings

  • The eNanoMapper database for nanomaterial safety information

    Nina Jeliazkova;Charalampos Chomenidis;Philip Doganis;Bengt Fadeel

  • Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way

    Philippe Rocca-Serra;Reza M. Salek;Masanori Arita;Elon Correa

  • The Chemical Information Ontology: Provenance and Disambiguation for Chemical Data on the Biological Semantic Web

    Janna Hastings;Leonid Chepelev;Egon Willighagen;Nico Adams;Nico Adams

  • A scoping review of ontologies related to human behaviour change.

    Emma Norris;Ailbhe N Finnerty;Janna Hastings;Gillian Stokes

  • eNanoMapper: harnessing ontologies to enable data integration for nanomaterial risk assessment

    Janna Hastings;Nina Jeliazkova;Gareth Owen;Georgia Tsiliki

  • Representation of behaviour change interventions and their evaluation: Development of the Upper Level of the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology.

    Susan Michie;Robert West;Ailbhe N. Finnerty;Emma Norris

  • Delivering Behaviour Change Interventions: Development of a Mode of Delivery Ontology.

    Marta M. Marques;Rachel N. Carey;Emma Norris;Fiona Evans

  • Dovetailing biology and chemistry: integrating the Gene Ontology with the ChEBI chemical ontology

    David P Hill;Nico Adams;Nico Adams;Nico Adams;Mike Bada;Colin Batchelor

  • The MetaboLights repository: curation challenges in metabolomics

    Reza M. Salek;Kenneth Haug;Pablo Conesa;Janna Hastings

  • Structure-based Classification and Ontology in Chemistry

    Janna Hastings;Janna Hastings;Despoina Magka;Colin R. Batchelor;Lian Duan;Lian Duan

  • Multi-Omics and Genome-Scale Modeling Reveal a Metabolic Shift During C. elegans Aging

    Janna Hastings;Abraham Mains;Bhupinder Virk;Nicolas Rodriguez

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Steinbeck
Christoph Steinbeck Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Stefan Schulz
Stefan Schulz Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Robert West
Robert West University College London
Marta M. Marques
Marta M. Marques Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública
Egon Willighagen
Egon Willighagen Maastricht University
Michel Dumontier
Michel Dumontier Maastricht University
Nicolas Le Novère
Nicolas Le Novère Babraham Institute
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen
Barry Smith
Barry Smith University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree online offers flexibility and access to diverse career options. Students can choose from the computer science degree online programs, which allow for accelerated learning and the ability to fit studies around personal schedules.

Cost is often a major concern. Fortunately, there are many affordable online colleges that provide quality education without overwhelming student debt. For those worried about past academic performance, several college with low gpa options consider a holistic admissions approach, making it possible to start or continue your education regardless of earlier challenges.

A background in computer science also opens doors to interdisciplinary fields. For instance, with the increasing focus on sustainability and technology, you can explore what can you do with an environmental science degree and merge computer science skills with environmental problem-solving. These pathways allow students to align studies with evolving job markets and personal passions.

Best Scientists Citing Janna Hastings

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles