World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ivanka Prichard

Ivanka Prichard

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4583
World Ranking
11158
National Ranking
637

Ivanka Prichard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivanka Prichard sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ivanka Prichard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivanka Prichard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Relations among exercise type, self-objectification, and body image in the fitness centre environment: the role of reasons for exercise.

    Ivanka Joyce Prichard;Marika Tiggemann

  • “Fitspiration” on Social Media: A Content Analysis of Gendered Images

    Elise Rose Carrotte;Ivanka Prichard;Megan Su Cheng Lim;Megan Su Cheng Lim;Megan Su Cheng Lim

  • Idealised media images: The effect of fitspiration imagery on body satisfaction and exercise behaviour

    Lily Robinson;Ivanka Prichard;Ivanka Prichard;Alyssa Nikolaidis;Claire Drummond

  • Objectification in Fitness Centers: Self-Objectification, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating in Aerobic Instructors and Aerobic Participants

    Ivanka Joyce Prichard;Marika Tiggemann

  • “I aspire to look and feel healthy like the posts convey”: engagement with fitness inspiration on social media and perceptions of its influence on health and wellbeing

    Michelle Raggatt;Cassandra J C Wright;Cassandra J C Wright;Elise Carrotte;Rebecca Jenkinson;Rebecca Jenkinson;Rebecca Jenkinson

  • The Impact of Different Forms of #fitspiration Imagery on Body Image, Mood, and Self-Objectification among Young Women

    Ivanka Prichard;Annabel C. McLachlan;Tiffany Lavis;Marika Tiggemann

  • The effect of Instagram #fitspiration images on young women’s mood, body image, and exercise behaviour

    Ivanka Prichard;Eliza Kavanagh;Kate E. Mulgrew;Megan S.C. Lim

  • What causes breast cancer? A systematic review of causal attributions among breast cancer survivors and how these compare to expert-endorsed risk factors

    Jo Anne Dumalaon-Canaria;Amanda Hutchinson;Amanda Hutchinson;Ivanka Joyce Prichard;Carlene J Wilson

  • Public Acceptability of Gene Therapy and Gene Editing for Human Use: A Systematic Review

    Juliette Delhove;Juliette Delhove;Ivana Osenk;Ivanka Prichard;Martin Donnelley;Martin Donnelley

  • A systematic review of interventions to support the careers of women in academic medicine and other disciplines

    Kate Laver;Ivanka Joyce Prichard;Monica Cations;Ivana Osenk

  • Psychosocial factors that influence men's help-seeking for cancer symptoms: a systematic synthesis of mixed methods research

    Jennifer A. Fish;Ivanka Prichard;Kerry Ettridge;Elizabeth A. Grunfeld

  • Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on youth sport in Australia and consequences for future participation and retention.

    Samuel Elliott;M Drummond;I Prichard;Rochelle Eime;Rochelle Eime

  • The Effect of Simultaneous Exercise and Exposure to Thin-Ideal Music Videos on Women’s State Self-Objectification, Mood and Body Satisfaction

    Ivanka Prichard;Marika Tiggemann

  • TikTok on the clock but the #fitspo don’t stop: The impact of TikTok fitspiration videos on women’s body image concerns

    Unknown

  • Exposure to Barbie: Effects on thin-ideal internalisation, body esteem, and body dissatisfaction among young girls.

    Karlie Rice;Ivanka Prichard;Marika Tiggemann;Amy Slater

  • More opportunities, same challenges: adolescent girls in sports that are traditionally constructed as masculine

    Nadia Bevan;Claire Drummond;Liz Abery;Sam Elliott

  • mHealth Interventions to Reduce Alcohol Use in Young People: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

    Alison Hutton;Ivanka Prichard;Dean Whitehead;Susan Thomas

  • The Breast Size Satisfaction Survey (BSSS): Breast size dissatisfaction and its antecedents and outcomes in women from 40 nations.

    Viren Swami;Ulrich S. Tran;David Barron;Reza Afhami

  • A Comparison of Physical Activity Mobile Apps With and Without Existing Web-Based Social Networking Platforms: Systematic Review.

    Jasmine Maria Petersen;Ivanka Prichard;Eva Kemps

  • Intergenerational transmission of dietary behaviours: A qualitative study of Anglo-Australian, Chinese-Australian and Italian-Australian three-generation families.

    Kate Rhodes;Flora Chan;Ivanka Prichard;Ivanka Prichard;John Coveney

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlene Wilson
Carlene Wilson Flinders University
Marika Tiggemann
Marika Tiggemann Flinders University
Eva Kemps
Eva Kemps Flinders University
Megan S. C. Lim
Megan S. C. Lim Burnet Institute
C. Peter Herman
C. Peter Herman University of Toronto
Janet Polivy
Janet Polivy University of Toronto
John Coveney
John Coveney Flinders University
Elizabeth A. Grunfeld
Elizabeth A. Grunfeld Birkbeck, University of London
Mark Rubin
Mark Rubin Durham University
Paul Ward
Paul Ward Torrens University Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ivanka Prichard

Recently Published Articles