World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Isztar Zawadzki

Isztar Zawadzki

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8271
World Ranking
5797
National Ranking
248

Isztar Zawadzki publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isztar Zawadzki sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Isztar Zawadzki D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isztar Zawadzki sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science

Overview

Isztar Zawadzki is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and conducts research primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work focuses extensively on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. The main research topics addressed by Zawadzki include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Precipitation Measurement and Analysis, Climate Variability and Models, and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research.

Zawadzki has contributed to several research publications over recent years, appearing in notable scientific venues. Among these are:

  • A quest for precipitation attractors in weather radar archives (2024), published in Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
  • A Heuristic Approach for Precipitation Data Assimilation: Effect of Forecast Errors and Assimilation of NCEP Stage IV Precipitation Analyses (2020), published in Monthly Weather Review
  • A Sequential Non-Gaussian Approach for Precipitation Data Assimilation (2021), published in Monthly Weather Review

Frequent publication venues for Zawadzki include Monthly Weather Review with two publications, and Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics with one publication.

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Andrés A. Pérez Hortal, M. K. Yau, Loris Foresti, Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras, and Daniele Nerini.

In 2007, Zawadzki received the designation Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada from the Academy of Science, highlighting a recognized professional standing within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Long-Term Radar Observations of the Melting Layer of Precipitation and Their Interpretation

    Frederic Fabry;Isztar Zawadzki

  • Use of NWP for Nowcasting Convective Precipitation: Recent Progress and Challenges

    Juanzhen Sun;Ming Xue;James W. Wilson;Isztar Zawadzki

  • Scale-Dependence of the Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part I: Description of the Methodology

    Unknown

  • Biogenic and anthropogenic sources of ice-forming nuclei : A review

    Wanda Szyrmer;Isztar Zawadzki

  • Statistical Properties of Precipitation Patterns

    Unknown

  • Scale Dependence of the Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part II: Probability Forecasts

    Unknown

  • On the Extraction of Near-Surface Index of Refraction Using Radar Phase Measurements from Ground Targets

    Frédéric Fabry;Chuck Frush;Isztar Zawadzki;Alamelu Kilambi

  • Variability of Drop Size Distributions: Time-Scale Dependence of the Variability and Its Effects on Rain Estimation

    Gyu Won Lee;Isztar Zawadzki

  • Reflectivity-Rain Rate Relationships for Radar Hydrology in Brazil

    Unknown

  • Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part III: Operational Nowcasting Implementation (MAPLE)

    B. J. Turner;I. Zawadzki;U. Germann

  • Precipitation forecast skill of numerical weather prediction models and radar nowcasts

    Charles Lin;Slavko Vasić;Alamelu Kilambi;Barry Turner

  • Instrumental Uncertainties in Z–R Relations

    Edwin Campos;Isztar Zawadzki

  • A general approach to double moment normalization of drop size distributions

    Gyu Won Lee;Isztar Zawadzki;Wanda Szyrmer;Daniel Sempere-Torres

  • Modeling of the melting layer. Part I : Dynamics and microphysics

    Wanda Szyrmer;Isztar Zawadzki

  • On Radar-Raingage Comparison

    Unknown

  • Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part IV: Limits to Prediction.

    Urs Germann;Isztar Zawadzki;Barry Turner

  • Identification and Removal of Ground Echoes and Anomalous Propagation Using the Characteristics of Radar Echoes

    Yo-Han Cho;Gyu Won Lee;Kyung-Eak Kim;Isztar Zawadzki

  • A Variational Method for Real-Time Retrieval of Three-Dimensional Wind Field from Multiple-Doppler Bistatic Radar Network Data

    Alain Protat;Isztar Zawadzki

  • Modeling of the Melting Layer. Part III: The Density Effect

    I. Zawadzki;W. Szyrmer;C. Bell;F. Fabry

  • Identification of the bright band through the analysis of volumetric radar data

    Rafael Sánchez-Diezma;Isztar Zawadzki;Daniel Sempere-Torres

  • Error Statistics of VPR Corrections in Stratiform Precipitation

    Aldo Bellon;Gyu Won Lee;Isztar Zawadzki

  • Detection of stratospheric ozone intrusions by windprofiler radars

    W. K. Hocking;T. Carey-Smith;T. Carey-Smith;D. W. Tarasick;P. S. Argall

  • Variability of Drop Size Distributions: Noise and Noise Filtering in Disdrometric Data

    Gyu Won Lee;Isztar Zawadzki

  • Observations of supercooled water and secondary ice generation by a vertically pointing X-band Doppler radar

    I Zawadzki;F Fabry;W Szyrmer

  • A Study of the Error Covariance Matrix of Radar Rainfall Estimates in Stratiform Rain

    Marc Berenguer;Isztar Zawadzki

Frequent Co-Authors

Remko Uijlenhoet
Remko Uijlenhoet Delft University of Technology
Ming Xue
Ming Xue University of Oklahoma
Alain Protat
Alain Protat Bureau of Meteorology
George A. Isaac
George A. Isaac Weather Impacts Consulting Incorporated
Fanyou Kong
Fanyou Kong University of Oklahoma
René Laprise
René Laprise University of Quebec at Montreal
David W. Tarasick
David W. Tarasick Environment and Climate Change Canada
Juanzhen Sun
Juanzhen Sun National Center for Atmospheric Research
Robert Meneghini
Robert Meneghini Goddard Space Flight Center
V. Chandrasekar
V. Chandrasekar Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens the door to diverse career opportunities, often supported by complementary degrees that enhance technical and managerial skills. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental research and planning, making programs listed under best gis schools an excellent choice for those looking to specialize in spatial data analysis.

Leadership and policy development skills are equally important, which makes online programs like the 1 year mpa online highly valuable for professionals aiming to fast-track their administrative careers in environmental agencies or nonprofits.

Incorporating social dimensions into environmental work is essential, and pursuing an online bachelors degree programs in sociology can provide critical insights into human-environment interactions, community dynamics, and social justice issues.

For educators and researchers, advanced credentials are often necessary. Options such as education doctoral programs without dissertation offer a flexible pathway for experienced professionals seeking to enhance their expertise without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Best Scientists Citing Isztar Zawadzki

Trending Scientists