World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
16547
World Ranking
3101
National Ranking
1763

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
16633
World Ranking
3363
National Ranking
1560

Ingrid R. Olson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid R. Olson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ingrid R. Olson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid R. Olson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ingrid R. Olson is affiliated with Temple University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their work spans various subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, developmental and educational psychology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's research focuses on several key topics, such as advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, functional brain connectivity studies, memory and neural mechanisms, memory processes and influences, vestibular and auditory disorders, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, and child and animal learning development.

Several recent papers illustrate the scope and direction of their work:

  • "Multimodal mapping of the face connectome," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Dissecting the Fornix in Basic Memory Processes and Neuropsychiatric Disease: A Review," 2020, Brain Connectivity
  • "The Social Cerebellum: A Large-Scale Investigation of Functional and Structural Specificity and Connectivity," 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Contingency of semantic generalization on episodic specificity varies across development," 2021, Current Biology
  • "Little brain, little minds: The big role of the cerebellum in social development," 2023, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Collaborations form an integral part of their research, frequently working with coauthors such as Haroon Popal, Nora S. Newcombe, Linda J. Hoffman, Katie R. Jobson, and Athanasia Metoki.

Their publications often appear in venues with notable frequency, including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's & Dementia, Nature Human Behaviour, Cerebral Cortex, and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • The Enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing.

    Ingrid R. Olson;Alan Plotzker;Youssef Ezzyat

  • The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account

    Roberto Cabeza;Elisa Ciaramelli;Ingrid R. Olson;Morris Moscovitch

  • Dissecting the uncinate fasciculus: disorders, controversies and a hypothesis.

    Rebecca J. Von Der Heide;Laura M. Skipper;Elizabeth Klobusicky;Ingrid R. Olson

  • Amygdala hyperreactivity in borderline personality disorder: implications for emotional dysregulation.

    Nelson H Donegan;Charles A Sanislow;Hilary P Blumberg;Robert K Fulbright

  • Organization of visual short-term memory.

    Yuhong Jiang;Ingrid R. Olson;Marvin M. Chun

  • Facial Attractiveness Is Appraised in a Glance.

    Ingrid R. Olson;Christy Marshuetz

  • Working Memory for Conjunctions Relies on the Medial Temporal Lobe

    Ingrid R. Olson;Katie Page;Katherine Sledge Moore;Anjan Chatterjee

  • Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes: a review and theoretical framework

    Ingrid R. Olson;David McCoy;Elizabeth Klobusicky;Lars A. Ross

  • Parietal lobe and episodic memory: bilateral damage causes impaired free recall of autobiographical memory.

    Marian E. Berryhill;Lisa Phuong;Lauren Picasso;Roberto Cabeza

  • Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis

    Ingrid R. Olson;Yuhong Jiang

  • Working memory training and transfer in older adults.

    Lauren L. Richmond;Alexandra B. Morrison;Jason M. Chein;Ingrid R. Olson

  • Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes.

    Lars A. Ross;Ingrid R. Olson

  • Visual Working Memory Is Impaired when the Medial Temporal Lobe Is Damaged

    Ingrid R. Olson;Katherine Sledge Moore;Marianna Stark;Anjan Chatterjee

  • Dissociation Between Memory Accuracy and Memory Confidence Following Bilateral Parietal Lesions

    Jon S. Simons;Polly V. Peers;Yonatan S. Mazuz;Marian E. Berryhill;Marian E. Berryhill

  • Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context

    Ingrid R. Olson;Marvin M. Chun

  • Beyond the FFA: The role of the ventral anterior temporal lobes in face processing.

    Jessica A. Collins;Ingrid R. Olson

  • Development of the uncinate fasciculus: Implications for theory and developmental disorders.

    Ingrid R. Olson;Rebecca J. Von Der Heide;Kylie H. Alm;Govinda Vyas

  • Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention.

    Ingrid R. Olson;Marvin M. Chun

  • Is the posterior parietal lobe involved in working memory retrieval? Evidence from patients with bilateral parietal lobe damage.

    Marian E. Berryhill;Ingrid R. Olson

  • Some surprising findings on the involvement of the parietal lobe in human memory

    Ingrid R. Olson;Marian Berryhill;Marian Berryhill

Frequent Co-Authors

Marian E. Berryhill
Marian E. Berryhill University of Nevada Reno
Nora S. Newcombe
Nora S. Newcombe Temple University
John C. Gore
John C. Gore Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Marvin M. Chun
Marvin M. Chun Yale University
David A. Wolk
David A. Wolk University of Pennsylvania
Yuhong V. Jiang
Yuhong V. Jiang University of Minnesota
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
H. Branch Coslett
H. Branch Coslett University of Pennsylvania
Jason Chein
Jason Chein Temple University
Geoffrey K. Aguirre
Geoffrey K. Aguirre University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a wide array of career opportunities, including becoming a professional counselor. With the growth of online degree programs, it's now easier than ever to start your journey in this rewarding field. Many states offer various pathways to licensure, which means the process and requirements can differ significantly based on location.

Prospective students may want to consider local licensing requirements, internship hours, and accredited programs. If you're looking for the fastest way to become a counselor in Ohio, there are specific programs designed for speed and flexibility. Likewise, there are resources for the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Oklahoma, as well as advice on the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Oregon.

For those interested in Pennsylvania, there are Pennsylvania fastest counseling programs available online. Researching these targeted programs can help you find the most efficient and convenient route to a psychology career, tailored to your state and professional aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Ingrid R. Olson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles