World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Mathematics
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
93
Citations
52679
World Ranking
59
National Ranking
2

Physics

D-Index
96
Citations
55400
World Ranking
1843
National Ranking
165

Peter Grassberger publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Grassberger sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 366 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Peter Grassberger D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Grassberger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Mathematics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Mathematics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Mathematics in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Peter Grassberger is a researcher affiliated with Forschungszentrum Jülich in Germany, specializing primarily in the fields of Physics and Astronomy and Mathematics. Their research spans several subfields, including Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Control and Systems Engineering, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work focuses extensively on topics such as Stochastic Processes and Statistical Mechanics, Theoretical and Computational Physics, Complex Network Analysis Techniques, Statistical Mechanics and Entropy, Control Systems and Identification, Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis, and Random Matrices and Applications.

Grassberger has contributed numerous scientific papers published in various academic venues. Recent publications include:

  • On Generalized Schürmann Entropy Estimators, 2022, Entropy
  • Aftermath epidemics: Percolation on the sites visited by generalized random walks, 2023, Physical review. E
  • Morphological transitions in supercritical generalized percolation and moving interfaces in media with frozen randomness, 2020, Physical Review Research
  • Revisiting a low-dimensional model with short range interactions and mean field critical behavior, 2021, Europhysics Letters (EPL)
  • Many universality classes in an interface model restricted to non-negative heights, 2023, Physical review. E

The primary venues for their publications include arXiv (Cornell University), Physical review. E, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Entropy, and Physical Review Research.

Frequent collaborators in their research endeavors include Mohadeseh Feshanjerdi, Deepak Dhar, A. A. Masoudi, Mahdieh Ebrahimi, and P. K. Mohanty.

Best Publications

  • Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors

    Peter Grassberger;Peter Grassberger;Itamar Procaccia

  • Characterization of Strange Attractors

    Peter Grassberger;Itamar Procaccia

  • Estimating mutual information.

    Alexander Kraskov;Harald Stögbauer;Peter Grassberger

  • Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal

    Peter Grassberger;Itamar Procaccia

  • Generalized dimensions of strange attractors

    Peter Grassberger

  • Reduction of the three-particle collision problem to multi-channel two-particle Lippmann-Schwinger equations

    E.O. Alt;P. Grassberger;W. Sandhas

  • Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: A case study on electroencephalographic signals

    R. Quian Quiroga;A. Kraskov;T. Kreuz;T. Kreuz;P. Grassberger

  • Dimensions and entropies of strange attractors from a fluctuating dynamics approach

    P. Grassberger;I. Procaccia

  • Toward a Quantitative Theory of Self-Generated Complexity

    Peter Grassberger

  • On the critical behavior of the general epidemic process and dynamical percolation

    P. Grassberger;P. Grassberger

  • NONLINEAR TIME SEQUENCE ANALYSIS

    Peter Grassberger;Thomas Schreiber;Carsten Schaffrath

  • Reggeon field theory (Schlögl's first model) on a lattice: Monte Carlo calculations of critical behaviour

    P Grassberger;A de la Torre

  • Pruned-enriched Rosenbluth method: Simulations of θ polymers of chain length up to 1 000 000

    Peter Grassberger

  • A robust method for detecting interdependences: application to intracranially recorded EEG

    J. Arnhold;P. Grassberger;K. Lehnertz;C. E. Elger

  • Scaling laws for invariant measures on hyperbolic and nonhyperbolic atractors

    P. Grassberger;R. Badii;A. Politi

  • Event synchronization: A simple and fast method to measure synchronicity and time delay patterns

    R. Quian Quiroga;R. Quian Quiroga;T. Kreuz;T. Kreuz;P. Grassberger

  • The long time properties of diffusion in a medium with static traps

    Peter Grassberger;Itamar Procaccia

  • Repellers, semi-attractors, and long-lived chaotic transients

    H. Kantz;P. Grassberger

  • On phase transitions in Schlögl's second model

    Unknown

  • On noise reduction methods for chaotic data.

    Peter Grassberger;Rainer Hegger;Holger Kantz;Carsten Schaffrath

  • Reply to ``Comment on `Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: A case study on electroencephalographic signals' ''

    R. Quian Quiroga;A. Kraskov;P. Grassberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Kraskov
Alexander Kraskov University College London
Klaus Lehnertz
Klaus Lehnertz University of Bonn
Holger Kantz
Holger Kantz Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems
Antonio Politi
Antonio Politi University of Aberdeen
Christian E. Elger
Christian E. Elger University Hospital Bonn
Florian Mormann
Florian Mormann University of Bonn
Hans J. Herrmann
Hans J. Herrmann ESPCI Paris
Satya N. Majumdar
Satya N. Majumdar University of Paris-Saclay
Bernard Derrida
Bernard Derrida Collège de France
Constantino Tsallis
Constantino Tsallis Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways that complement a strong analytical foundation. Students interested in expanding their business acumen while leveraging quantitative skills often explore 1 year mba programs. These fast-paced degrees allow for quick transitions into leadership roles.

For those seeking flexibility, online mba programs that accept transfer credits are an attractive option, enabling learners to build upon previous coursework and accelerate their progress. This pathway is especially appealing to math graduates looking to combine technical expertise with business strategy.

Data-driven careers continue to grow, and a master in data analytics is one of the most relevant advanced degrees for math students. It provides skills in interpreting complex data sets, a critical asset in many industries.

Additionally, students who want to balance quality and accessibility might consider easy mba programs to get into. These programs offer practical business education with less competitive admission processes, ideal for those ready to upskill without delay.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Grassberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles