World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4177
World Ranking
13196
National Ranking
638

Ilia Polian publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilia Polian sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 252 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ilia Polian D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilia Polian sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ilia Polian is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany and has a substantial research portfolio focused primarily on computer science and engineering. Their work spans a wide array of specialized topics within these fields, emphasizing areas such as quantum computing, hardware security, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, Polian has contributed extensively to several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

The primary research topics covered by Polian's work are:

  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Polian are:

  • "Benchmarking the performance of portfolio optimization with QAOA," 2022, Quantum Information Processing
  • "Low-power emerging memristive designs towards secure hardware systems for applications in internet of things," 2021, Nano Materials Science
  • "Protecting artificial intelligence IPs: a survey of watermarking and fingerprinting for machine learning," 2021, CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology
  • "Optimal Partitioning of Quantum Circuits Using Gate Cuts and Wire Cuts," 2023, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering
  • "Optimal Mapping for Near-Term Quantum Architectures based on Rydberg Atoms," 2021, 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)

Polian frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Sebastian Brandhofer
  • Nan Du
  • Yanjun Ji
  • Xianyue Zhao
  • Ziang Chen

The venues where Polian has most frequently published their research include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology
  • IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering
  • Scientific Reports
  • Physical Review A

Best Publications

  • A Definition and Classification of Timing Anomalies

    Jan Reineke;Björn Wachter;Stephan Thesing;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • A Family of Logical Fault Models for Reversible Circuits

    I. Polian;T. Fiehn;B. Becker;J.P. Hayes

  • Testing for missing-gate faults in reversible circuits

    J.P. Hayes;I. Polian;B. Becker

  • X-masking during logic BIST and its impact on defect coverage

    Yuyi Tang;H.-J. Wunderlich;Piet Engelke;I. Polian

  • Simulating Resistive-Bridging and Stuck-At Faults

    Piet Engelke;I. Polian;M. Renovell;B. Becker

  • Fault-tolerant, high-level quantum circuits: form, compilation and description

    Alexandru Paler;Ilia Polian;Kae Nemoto;Simon J Devitt

  • Power Droop Testing

    I. Polian;A. Czutro;S. Kundu;B. Becker

  • Parametric Trojans for Fault-Injection Attacks on Cryptographic Hardware

    Raghavan Kumar;Philipp Jovanovic;Wayne Burleson;Ilia Polian

  • A fault attack on the LED block cipher

    Philipp Jovanovic;Martin Kreuzer;Ilia Polian

  • Adaptive voltage over-scaling for resilient applications

    Philipp Klaus Krause;Ilia Polian

  • An Analysis Framework for Transient-Error Tolerance

    J.P. Hayes;I. Polian;B. Becker

  • Selective Hardening: Toward Cost-Effective Error Tolerance

    I Polian;J P Hayes

  • Power Droop Testing

    I. Polian;A. Czutro;S. Kundu;B. Becker

  • Analysis and optimization of fault-tolerant embedded systems with hardened processors

    Viacheslav Izosimov;Ilia Polian;Paul Pop;Petru Eles

  • A Simulator of Small-Delay Faults Caused by Resistive-Open Defects

    A. Czutro;N. Houarche;P. Engelke;I. Polian

  • Functional Constraints vs. Test Compression in Scan-Based Delay Testing

    Ilia Polian;Hideo Fujiwara

  • Small-delay-fault ATPG with waveform accuracy

    Matthias Sauer;Alexander Czutro;Ilia Polian;Bernd Becker

  • Automatic Test Pattern Generation for Interconnect Open Defects

    S. Spinner;I. Polian;P. Engelke;B. Becker

  • Resistive Bridge fault model evolution from conventional to ultra deep submicron

    I. Polian;P. Engelke;B. Becker;S. Kundu

  • Functional Constraints vs. Test Compression in Scan-Based Delay Testing

    I. Polian;H. Fujiwara

  • Low-power emerging memristive designs towards secure hardware systems for applications in internet of things

    Nan Du;Heidemarie Schmidt;Ilia Polian

  • A study of cognitive resilience in a JPEG compressor

    D. Nowroth;I. Polian;B. Becker

  • TIGUAN: Thread-Parallel Integrated Test Pattern Generator Utilizing Satisfiability ANalysis

    Alejandro Czutro;Ilia Polian;Matthew Lewis;Piet Engelke

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernd Becker
Bernd Becker University of Freiburg
Michel Renovell
Michel Renovell Montpellier Laboratory of Informatics, Robotics and Microelectronics
John P. Hayes
John P. Hayes University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Francesco Regazzoni
Francesco Regazzoni Polytechnic University of Milan
Sudhakar M. Reddy
Sudhakar M. Reddy University of Iowa
Hans-Joachim Wunderlich
Hans-Joachim Wunderlich University of Stuttgart
Sandip Kundu
Sandip Kundu University of Massachusetts Amherst
Raghavan Kumar
Raghavan Kumar Intel (United States)
Oliver Paul
Oliver Paul University of Freiburg
Irith Pomeranz
Irith Pomeranz Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens doors to many thriving fields. For students seeking advanced analytics roles, earning a data scientist degree is a popular pathway, and many universities now offer affordable online programs to boost your credentials.

Engineering enthusiasts may consider the best online electrical engineering programs USA, which combine flexibility and top-notch instruction to help graduates compete in a dynamic job market.

If you’re looking to quickly enhance your employability, there are many certifications for jobs that provide a shortcut to well-paying positions, sometimes in less time than a full degree.

For those eager to fast-track their career, exploring the shortest masters degree programs online is a smart move. These accelerated programs let you gain advanced skills efficiently, helping you qualify for more specialized and higher-paying roles in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Ilia Polian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles