World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
6826
World Ranking
17783
National Ranking
7276

Harold C. Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 143 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Harold C. Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Harold C. Smith is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States and focuses their research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Immunology, and Plant Science.

The main research topics covered by Harold C. Smith include:

  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Interferon and Immune Responses
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • RNA and Protein Synthesis Mechanisms

Smith has contributed to scientific literature through multiple recent publications, highlighting research on viral infections and molecular mechanisms. Selected recent papers include:

  • "A Novel Ebola Virus VP40 Matrix Protein-Based Screening for Identification of Novel Candidate Medical Countermeasures," 2020, published in Viruses
  • "Sangivamycin is highly effective against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and has favorable drug properties," 2021, published in JCI Insight
  • "Cyclic peptides with a distinct arginine-fork motif recognize the HIV trans-activation response RNA in vitro and in cells," 2021, published in Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • "Sangivamycin is preferentially incorporated into viral RNA by the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase," 2023, published in Antiviral Research
  • "Corrigendum to "Sangivamycin is preferentially incorporated into viral RNA by the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase"," 2023, published in Antiviral Research

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Smith include:

  • Ryan P. Bennett
  • Jason D. Salter
  • Elena Postnikova
  • Yíngyún Caì
  • Shuǐqìng Yú

Smith's work has been published in a variety of scientific venues, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Antiviral Research
  • Viruses
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • JCI Insight
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Best Publications

  • The APOBEC Protein Family: United by Structure, Divergent in Function

    Jason D. Salter;Ryan P. Bennett;Harold C. Smith

  • MESSENGER RNA EDITING IN MAMMALS: NEW MEMBERS OF THE APOBEC FAMILY SEEKING ROLES IN THE FAMILY BUSINESS

    Joseph E. Wedekind;Geoffrey S.C. Dance;Mark.P. Sowden;Harold C. Smith

  • Functions and regulation of the APOBEC family of proteins.

    Harold C. Smith;Ryan P. Bennett;Ayse Kizilyer;William M. McDougall

  • A guide to RNA editing.

    Harold C. Smith;Jonatha M. Gott;Maureen R. Hanson

  • APOBEC3G/CEM15 (hA3G) mRNA Levels Associate Inversely with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Viremia

    Xia Jin;Andy Brooks;Huiyuan Chen;Ryan Bennett

  • The Neurofibromatosis Type I Messenger RNA Undergoes Base-Modification RNA Editing

    Gary R. Skuse;Amedeo J. Cappione;Mark Sowden;Linda J. Metheny

  • Nuclear matrix-bound DNA synthesis: an in vitro system

    Harold C. Smith;Ronald Berezney

  • Spatial distribution of DNA loop attachment and replicational sites in the nuclear matrix

    H.C. Smith;E. Puvion;L.A. Buchholtz;R. Berezney

  • In vitro apolipoprotein B mRNA editing: identification of a 27S editing complex.

    Harold C. Smith;Shu-Ru Kuo;John W. Backus;Stanley G. Harris

  • Extract-specific heterogeneity in high-order complexes containing apolipoprotein B mRNA editing activity and RNA-binding proteins.

    S G Harris;I Sabio;E Mayer;M F Steinberg

  • Redistribution of U-snRNPs during mitosis

    David L. Spector;Harold C. Smith

  • Three distinct RNA sequence elements are required for efficient apolipoprotein B (apoB) RNA editing in vitro.

    John W. Backus;Harold C. Smith

  • The structure of a yeast RNA-editing deaminase provides insight into the fold and function of activation-induced deaminase and APOBEC-1

    Kefang Xie;Mark P. Sowden;Geoffrey S. C. Dance;Andrew T. Torelli

  • Overexpression of APOBEC-1 Results in Mooring Sequence-dependent Promiscuous RNA Editing (∗)

    Mark Sowden;Jonathan K. Hamm;Harold C. Smith

  • Nanostructures of APOBEC3G Support a Hierarchical Assembly Model of High Molecular Mass Ribonucleoprotein Particles from Dimeric Subunits

    Joseph E. Wedekind;Richard Gillilan;Alena Janda;Jolanta Krucinska

  • DNA polymerase α is tightly bound to the nuclear matrix of actively replicating liver

    Harold C. Smith;Ronald Berezney

  • Impaired hepatic apolipoprotein B and E translation in streptozotocin diabetic rats.

    J D Sparks;R Zolfaghari;C E Sparks;H C Smith

  • Increasing the yield of soluble recombinant protein expressed in E. coli by induction during late log phase.

    Chad A Galloway;Mark P Sowden;Harold C Smith

  • Apolipoprotein B mRNA sequences 3′ of the editing site are necessary and sufficient for editing and editosome assembly

    John W. Backus;Harold C. Smith

  • Multiple protein domains determine the cell type-specific nuclear distribution of the catalytic subunit required for apolipoprotein B mRNA editing

    Yang Y;Smith Hc

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Berezney
Ronald Berezney University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Xia Jin
Xia Jin Chinese Academy of Sciences
Stephen Dewhurst
Stephen Dewhurst University of Rochester
Baek Kim
Baek Kim Emory University
David L. Spector
David L. Spector Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Nazzareno Ballatori
Nazzareno Ballatori University of Rochester
A. Craig Chinault
A. Craig Chinault Baylor College of Medicine
Maureen R. Hanson
Maureen R. Hanson Cornell University
Adrian R. Krainer
Adrian R. Krainer Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
James F. Scott
James F. Scott University of St Andrews

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Harold C. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles