World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 52 4523 4329 1681 1551 185 9127

Giulio A. De Leo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giulio A. De Leo between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giulio A. De Leo published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2024. 21 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2024. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giulio A. De Leo: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 0
2000 1
2001 4
2002 8
2003 3
2004 3
2005 0
2006 6
2007 5
2008 6
2009 0
2010 3
2011 8
2012 8
2013 6
2014 5
2015 11
2016 6
2017 16
2018 5
2019 17
2020 17
2021 18
2022 14
2023 15
2024 21
2025 20
2026 1
Total 239
Download as CSV

Giulio A. De Leo publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giulio A. De Leo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 185 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 185
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Giulio A. De Leo D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giulio A. De Leo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266 52
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Giulio A. De Leo is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics within Environmental Science and Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Ecology, Parasitology, Global and Planetary Change, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their work covers main research topics such as Parasites and Host Interactions, Parasite Biology and Host Interactions, Zoonotic Diseases and Public Health, Global Maternal and Child Health, Marine and Fisheries Research, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies.

Giulio A. De Leo has published extensively in several venues, including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, The Lancet Planetary Health, Scientific Reports, and Frontiers in Public Health.

Frequent collaborators include Susanne H. Sokolow, Andrew J. Chamberlin, Isabel J. Jones, Andrea J. Lund, and Nicolas Jouanard.

Selected recent publications include:

  • Human-mediated impacts on biodiversity and the consequences for zoonotic disease spillover, 2021, Current Biology
  • Climatic, land-use and socio-economic factors can predict malaria dynamics at fine spatial scales relevant to local health actors: Evidence from rural Madagascar, 2023, PLOS Global Public Health
  • Improving rural health care reduces illegal logging and conserves carbon in a tropical forest, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • A planetary health innovation for disease, food and water challenges in Africa, 2023, Nature
  • Effects of agrochemical pollution on schistosomiasis transmission: a systematic review and modelling analysis, 2020, The Lancet Planetary Health

Best Publications

  • Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links

    Kevin D. Lafferty;Stefano Allesina;Matias Arim;Cherie J. Briggs

  • The Multifaceted Aspects of Ecosystem Integrity

    Giulio A. De Leo;Simon Asher Levin

  • Evidence that marine reserves enhance resilience to climatic impacts.

    Fiorenza Micheli;Andrea Saenz-Arroyo;Ashley P. Greenley;Leonardo Álvarez Vázquez

  • Application of a Random Forest algorithm to predict spatial distribution of the potential yield of Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon, Italy

    Simone Vincenzi;Matteo Zucchetta;Piero Franzoi;Michele Pellizzato

  • Global Assessment of Schistosomiasis Control Over the Past Century Shows Targeting the Snail Intermediate Host Works Best

    Susanne H. Sokolow;Susanne H. Sokolow;Chelsea L. Wood;Isabel J. Jones;Scott J. Swartz

  • Integrating marine protected areas with catch regulation

    Ray Hilborn;Fiorenza Micheli;Giulio A De Leo

  • Reduced transmission of human schistosomiasis after restoration of a native river prawn that preys on the snail intermediate host

    Susanne H. Sokolow;Susanne H. Sokolow;Elizabeth Huttinger;Nicolas Jouanard;Michael H. Hsieh

  • Assessing the effectiveness of a large marine protected area for reef shark conservation

    Timothy D. White;Aaron B. Carlisle;David A. Kroodsma;Barbara A. Block

  • Disease ecology, health and the environment: a framework to account for ecological and socio-economic drivers in the control of neglected tropical diseases

    A. Garchitorena;A. Garchitorena;S. H. Sokolow;B. Roche;C. N. Ngonghala

  • Ecological interventions to prevent and manage zoonotic pathogen spillover

    Susanne H. Sokolow;Susanne H. Sokolow;Nicole Nova;Kim M. Pepin;Alison J. Peel

  • The value of spatial information in MPA network design

    Christopher Costello;Andrew Rassweiler;David Siegel;Giulio De Leo

  • A GIS-based habitat suitability model for commercial yield estimation of Tapes philippinarum in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Sacca di Goro, Italy)

    Simone Vincenzi;Graziano Caramori;Remigio Rossi;Giulio A. De Leo

  • Pricing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The Never-Ending Story

    Marino Gatto;Giulio A. De Leo

  • To Reduce the Global Burden of Human Schistosomiasis, Use ‘Old Fashioned’ Snail Control

    Susanne H. Sokolow;Susanne H. Sokolow;Chelsea L. Wood;Isabel J. Jones;Kevin D. Lafferty

  • THE INVASION ECOLOGY OF THE TOAD BUFO MARINUS:FROM SOUTH AMERICA TO AUSTRALIA

    Margarita Lampo;Giulio A. De Leo

  • Nearly 400 million people are at higher risk of schistosomiasis because dams block the migration of snail-eating river prawns

    Susanne H. Sokolow;Susanne H. Sokolow;Isabel J. Jones;Merlijn M. T. Jocque;Diana La

  • The Resilience of Marine Ecosystems to Climatic Disturbances

    Jennifer O'Leary;Fiorenza Micheli;Laura Airoldi;Charles Boch

  • Dispersal Patterns of Coastal Fish: Implications for Designing Networks of Marine Protected Areas

    Antonio Di Franco;Bronwyn M. Gillanders;Giuseppe De Benedetto;Antonio Pennetta

  • Uncertainty, climate change, and adaptive management

    Garry Peterson;Giulio Alessandro De Leo;Jessica J. Hellmann;Marco A. Janssen

  • Allometry and simple epidemic models for microparasites

    Giulio A. De Leo;Andrew P. Dobson

  • Precision mapping of snail habitat provides a powerful indicator of human schistosomiasis transmission

    Chelsea L. Wood;Susanne H. Sokolow;Isabel J. Jones;Andrew J Chamberlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Marino Gatto
Marino Gatto Polytechnic University of Milan
Kevin D. Lafferty
Kevin D. Lafferty United States Geological Survey
Andrew P. Dobson
Andrew P. Dobson Princeton University
Jason R. Rohr
Jason R. Rohr University of Notre Dame
Armand M. Kuris
Armand M. Kuris University of California, Santa Barbara
Mercedes Pascual
Mercedes Pascual University of Chicago
Andrea Rinaldo
Andrea Rinaldo École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Lorenzo Zane
Lorenzo Zane University of Padua
Hillary S. Young
Hillary S. Young University of California, Santa Barbara
Paolo Guidetti
Paolo Guidetti Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA often opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields. For those seeking alternatives or complementary skills, exploring the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insights into accessible degree options that still offer valuable knowledge applicable to environmental careers.

Specialized areas such as geology play a critical role in understanding Earth's processes and environmental impact. Many students benefit from enrolling in reputable online geology programs that offer flexibility and solid groundwork for careers in resource management and environmental consultancy.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another crucial skill set for environmental professionals. Learning about spatial data and mapping through the best GIS undergraduate programs can significantly enhance career prospects in fields like urban planning, conservation, and disaster management.

For those aiming to integrate policy and management into their environmental expertise, pursuing advanced leadership roles can be supported by programs such as 1 year MPA programs. These programs prepare graduates for impactful careers in environmental governance and public administration.

Best Scientists Citing Giulio A. De Leo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles