World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
24715
World Ranking
14226
National Ranking
7194

Gad Cotter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gad Cotter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 457 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gad Cotter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gad Cotter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gad Cotter is affiliated with Momentum Research Inc in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a concentration on heart failure and related conditions. Notable papers include:

  • Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial (2022, The Lancet)
  • Suboptimal reliability of liver biopsy evaluation has implications for randomized clinical trials (2020, Journal of Hepatology)
  • Acute heart failure: More questions than answers (2020, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases)
  • Worsening renal function in acute heart failure in the context of diuretic response (2021, European Journal of Heart Failure)
  • Uptitrating Treatment After Heart Failure Hospitalization Across the Spectrum of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)

Cotter's research has been published frequently in several specialized cardiovascular journals. The most common publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • ESC Heart Failure
  • JACC Heart Failure
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure
  • Heart Failure Reviews

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Beth A. Davison
  • Alexandre Mebazaa
  • Marco Metra
  • Ovidiu Chioncel
  • Piotr Ponikowski

The primary fields of study for Gad Cotter encompass Medicine, with over 300 publications, and significant subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Emergency Medicine.

The main research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management

Best Publications

  • Serelaxin, recombinant human relaxin-2, for treatment of acute heart failure (RELAX-AHF): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    John R Teerlink;Gad Cotter;Beth A Davison;G Michael Felker

  • Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema

    Gad Cotter;Gad Cotter;Einat Metzkor;Edo Kaluski;Zwi Faigenberg

  • Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: A report from the SHOCK trial registry

    Rupert Fincke;Judith S. Hochman;April M. Lowe;Venu Menon

  • Rolofylline, an Adenosine A1−Receptor Antagonist, in Acute Heart Failure

    Barry M. Massie;Christopher M. O'Connor;Marco Metra;Piotr Ponikowski

  • Is Worsening Renal Function an Ominous Prognostic Sign in Patients With Acute Heart Failure? The Role of Congestion and Its Interaction With Renal Function

    Marco Metra;Beth Davison;Luca Bettari;Hengrui Sun

  • The Causes, Treatment, and Outcome of Acute Heart Failure in 1006 Africans From 9 Countries Results of the Sub-Saharan Africa Survey of Heart Failure

    Albertino Damasceno;Bongani M. Mayosi;Mahmoud Sani;Okechukwu S. Ogah

  • Effect of Serelaxin on Cardiac, Renal, and Hepatic Biomarkers in the Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure (RELAX-AHF) Development Program: Correlation With Outcomes

    Marco Metra;Gad Cotter;Beth A. Davison;G. Michael Felker

  • Relaxin for the treatment of patients with acute heart failure (Pre-RELAX-AHF): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding phase IIb study

    John R Teerlink;Marco Metra;G Michael Felker;Piotr Ponikowski

  • Effects of Tezosentan on Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: The VERITAS Randomized Controlled Trials

    John J V McMurray;John R. Teerlink;Gadi Cotter;Robert C. Bourge

  • Worsening renal function in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure: clinical implications and prognostic significance.

    Marco Metra;Savina Nodari;Giovanni Parrinello;Tania Bordonali

  • Fluid overload in acute heart failure--re-distribution and other mechanisms beyond fluid accumulation.

    Gad Cotter;Marco Metra;Olga Milo-Cotter;Howard C. Dittrich

  • Diuretic response in acute heart failure: clinical characteristics and prognostic significance

    Mattia A. E. Valente;Adriaan A. Voors;Kevin Damman;Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen

  • The role of the kidney in heart failure

    Marco Metra;Gad Cotter;Mihai Gheorghiade;Livio Dei Cas

  • Suboptimal reliability of liver biopsy evaluation has implications for randomized clinical trials

    Beth A. Davison;Stephen A. Harrison;Gad Cotter;Naim Alkhouri

  • High-dose intravenous isosorbide-dinitrate is safer and better than Bi-PAP ventilation combined with conventional treatment for severe pulmonary edema

    Ahuva Sharon;Isaac Shpirer;Edo Kaluski;Yaron Moshkovitz

  • Posttraumatic stress, nonadherence, and adverse outcome in survivors of a myocardial infarction.

    Eyal Shemesh;Rachel Yehuda;Olga Milo;Irit Dinur

  • Lack of aspirin effect: aspirin resistance or resistance to taking aspirin?

    Gad Cotter;Eyal Shemesh;Miriam Zehavi;Irit Dinur

  • The PROTECT pilot study: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist rolofylline in patients with acute heart failure and renal impairment.

    Gad Cotter;Howard C. Dittrich;Beth Davison Weatherley;Daniel M. Bloomfield

  • Effects of Serelaxin in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

    Marco Metra;John R. Teerlink;Gad Cotter;Beth A. Davison

  • Prevalence, predictors and clinical outcome of residual congestion in acute decompensated heart failure

    Jorge Rubio-Gracia;Biniyam G. Demissei;Jozine M. ter Maaten;John G. Cleland

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Metra
Marco Metra University of Brescia
John R. Teerlink
John R. Teerlink University of California, San Francisco
Piotr Ponikowski
Piotr Ponikowski Wrocław Medical University
Adriaan A. Voors
Adriaan A. Voors University Medical Center Groningen
G. Michael Felker
G. Michael Felker Duke University
John G.F. Cleland
John G.F. Cleland University of Glasgow
Gerasimos Filippatos
Gerasimos Filippatos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Barry H. Greenberg
Barry H. Greenberg University of California, San Diego
Michael M. Givertz
Michael M. Givertz Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re planning a career in Medicine or a related healthcare field, there are many flexible online degree options available. For those interested in promoting healthy eating and wellness, online degrees in nutrition offer strong science foundations and can open doors to roles in clinical settings or public health.

Looking to move into healthcare management? cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs provide essential leadership training, helping you qualify for administrative roles in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses ready to advance can consider rn to bsn online no clinicals programs, which streamline the path to a bachelor’s degree—often fully online, with flexible schedules designed for working professionals.

Those seeking top credentials in nursing may opt for a 1 year dnp program online. These accelerated programs enable qualified nurses to reach the highest practice level in a shorter timeframe.

Exploring these online learning pathways can help you find the right fit for your healthcare career goals while balancing work and study.

Best Scientists Citing Gad Cotter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles