World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
12933
World Ranking
2624
National Ranking
1052

Frederick N. Scatena publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick N. Scatena sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 159 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Frederick N. Scatena D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick N. Scatena sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick N. Scatena was affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research contributions and academic career were connected to this institution.

There are no records of recent papers authored by Frederick N. Scatena available in the source data. Similarly, no frequent co-authors or regular publication venues have been documented.

The source data did not list any books published by Frederick N. Scatena or specify the publishers involved.

No information is provided regarding fields of study, subfields, or main research topics. Consequently, no specific domains within academic research can be attributed to their work based on the available data.

There are no awards or recognitions recorded in the source data related to Frederick N. Scatena.

It is noted that Frederick N. Scatena is deceased. The profile reflects this fact and uses past tense accordingly.

Best Publications

  • Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas

    William F. Laurance;William F. Laurance;D. Carolina Useche;Julio Rendeiro;Margareta Kalka

  • Tropical montane cloud forests.

    Lawrence S. Hamilton;James O. Juvik;F. N. Scatena

  • Hydrometeorology of tropical montane cloud forests: emerging patterns

    L. A. Bruijnzeel;Mark Mulligan;Frederick N. Scatena

  • Physical aspects of Hurricane Hugo in Puerto Rico

    F.N. Scatena;Matthew C. Larsen

  • BACKGROUND AND CATASTROPHIC TREE MORTALITY IN TROPICAL MOIST, WET, AND RAIN FORESTS

    Ariel E. Lugo;F. N. Scatena

  • EFFECTS OF A LOW‐HEAD DAM AND WATER ABSTRACTION ON MIGRATORY TROPICAL STREAM BIOTA

    Jonathan P. Benstead;James G. March;Catherine M. Pringle;Frederick N. Scatena

  • Tropical montane cloud forests : science for conservation and management

    Leendert Adriaan Bruijnzeel;F. N. Scatena;Lawrence S. Hamilton

  • Modelling rainfall interception by a lowland tropical rain forest in northeastern Puerto Rico

    J Schellekens;F.N Scatena;L.A Bruijnzeel;A.J Wickel

  • Geomorphology, disturbance, and the soil and vegetation of two subtropical wet steepland watersheds of Puerto Rico.

    F.N. Scatena;Ariel E. Lugo

  • The First five years in the reorganization of aboveground biomass and nutrient use following hurricane Hugo in the bisley Experimental Watersheds, luquillo Experimental Fortest, Puerto Rico

    F. N. Scatena;S. Moya;C. Estrada;J. D. Chinea

  • Damming Tropical Island Streams: Problems, Solutions, and Alternatives

    James G. March;Jonathan P. Benstead;Catherine M. Pringle;Frederick N. Scatena

  • An Introduction to the Physiography and History of the Bisley Experimental Watersheds in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico

    Frederick N. Scatena

  • Fine litterfall and related nutrient inputs resulting from Hurricane Hugo in subtropical wet and lower montane rain forests of Puerto Rico

    D. J. Lodge;F. N. Scatena;C. E. Asbury;M. J. Sanchez

  • Nutrient availability in a montane wet tropical forest: Spatial patterns and methodological considerations

    W. L. Silver;F. N. Scatena;A. H. Johnson;T. G. Siccama

  • Twelve testable hypotheses on the geobiology of weathering.

    S. L. Brantley;J. P. Megonigal;F. N. Scatena;Z. Balogh-Brunstad

  • Drivers of Holocene sea-level change in the Caribbean

    Nicole S Khan;Nicole S Khan;Erica Ashe;Benjamin P Horton;Benjamin P Horton;Andrea Dutton

  • Street tree survival rates: Meta-analysis of previous studies and application to a field survey in Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Lara A. Roman;Frederick N. Scatena

  • Disturbance and long-term patterns of rainfall and throughfall nutrient fluxes in a subtropical wet forest in Puerto Rico

    T. Heartsill-Scalley;T. Heartsill-Scalley;F.N. Scatena;F.N. Scatena;C. Estrada;W.H. McDowell

  • Throughfall in a Puerto Rican lower montane rain forest: A comparison of sampling strategies

    F. Holwerda;F.N. Scatena;L.A. Bruijnzeel

  • Biomass and nutrient content of the Bisley experimental watersheds, Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico, before and after Hurricane Hugo, 1989.

    F. N. Scatena;W. Silver;T. Siccama;A. Johnson

  • Trends in stream nitrogen concentrations for forested reference catchments across the USA

    A. Argerich;S.L. Johnson;S.D. Sebestyen;C.C. Rhoades

Frequent Co-Authors

L.A. Bruijnzeel
L.A. Bruijnzeel King's College London
Ariel E. Lugo
Ariel E. Lugo US Forest Service
Whendee L. Silver
Whendee L. Silver University of California, Berkeley
Alan P. Covich
Alan P. Covich University of Georgia
Todd A. Crowl
Todd A. Crowl Florida International University
Catherine M. Pringle
Catherine M. Pringle University of Georgia
Kristiina A. Vogt
Kristiina A. Vogt University of Washington
Robert Walker
Robert Walker University of Florida
William H. McDowell
William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire
Arthur H. Johnson
Arthur H. Johnson University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open new career pathways. Many professionals seek flexible options like online doctoral programs without dissertation, which allow for deeper specialization without lengthy research commitments.

Educators and researchers might consider transitioning through eds to edd programs online, providing a streamlined path from a master's level to a doctoral degree. This pathway supports career growth in academia and leadership roles focused on environmental policy and education.

For those leaning toward social impact roles within environmental justice and community work, some of the cheapest online dsw programs offer affordable avenues to doctoral qualifications in social work, complementing environmental science expertise.

Additionally, pursuing an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide foundational knowledge and flexibility, making it easier to tailor study plans toward interdisciplinary environmental topics.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick N. Scatena

Recently Published Articles