World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
9100
World Ranking
5461
National Ranking
2982

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
10578
World Ranking
4727
National Ranking
2131

Emily Rogalski publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Rogalski sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 237 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Emily Rogalski D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily Rogalski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily Rogalski is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and neuroscience, with a primary focus on psychiatry, mental health, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Physiology
  • Neurology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Rogalski's research covers several central topics such as:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Utility of the global CDR® plus NACC FTLD rating and development of scoring rules: Data from the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Consortium, 2020, Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Anatomical evidence of an indirect pathway for word repetition, 2020, Neurology
  • The Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS): Framework and methodology, 2021, Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Amyloid and tau-PET in early-onset AD: Baseline data from the Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS), 2023, Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Genetic screening of a large series of North American sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia cases, 2020, Alzheimer s & Dementia

The frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Sandra Weintraub
  • Changiz Geula
  • Mario F. Mendez
  • Chiadi U. Onyike
  • Marsel Mesulam

Rogalski has published extensively in several venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Neurology
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Innovation in Aging
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Alzheimer and Frontotemporal Pathology in Subsets of Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Marsel Mesulam;Alissa Wicklund;Nancy Johnson;Emily Rogalski

  • A novel frontal pathway underlies verbal fluency in primary progressive aphasia

    Marco Catani;Marsel M. Mesulam;Estrid Jakobsen;Farah Malik

  • Primary progressive aphasia and the evolving neurology of the language network

    M.-Marsel Mesulam;Emily J. Rogalski;Christina Wieneke;Robert S. Hurley

  • Quantitative classification of primary progressive aphasia at early and mild impairment stages

    M.-Marsel Mesulam;Christina Wieneke;Cynthia Thompson;Emily Rogalski

  • Asymmetry and heterogeneity of Alzheimer's and frontotemporal pathology in primary progressive aphasia

    M.-Marsel Mesulam;Sandra Weintraub;Emily J. Rogalski;Christina Wieneke

  • Age at symptom onset and death and disease duration in genetic frontotemporal dementia: an international retrospective cohort study.

    Katrina M. Moore;Jennifer Nicholas;Murray Grossman;Corey T. McMillan

  • QUANTITATIVE TEMPLATE FOR SUBTYPING PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE APHASIA

    Marsel Mesulam;Christina Wieneke;Emily Rogalski;Derin Cobia

  • Progression of language decline and cortical atrophy in subtypes of primary progressive aphasia

    E. Rogalski;D. Cobia;T.M. Harrison;C. Wieneke

  • The Wernicke conundrum and the anatomy of language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia

    M.-Marsel Mesulam;Cynthia K. Thompson;Sandra Weintraub;Emily J. Rogalski

  • Anatomy of Language Impairments in Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Emily J. Rogalski;Derin Cobia;Theresa M. Harrison;Christina Wieneke

  • Words and objects at the tip of the left temporal lobe in primary progressive aphasia

    M.-Marsel Mesulam;Christina Wieneke;Robert Hurley;Alfred Rademaker

  • Superior memory and higher cortical volumes in unusually successful cognitive aging.

    Theresa M. Harrison;Sandra Weintraub;M.-Marsel Mesulam;Emily Rogalski

  • The northwestern anagram test: measuring sentence production in primary progressive aphasia.

    Sandra Weintraub;M.-Marsel Mesulam;Christina Wieneke;Alfred Rademaker

  • Prevalence of amyloid-β pathology in distinct variants of primary progressive aphasia

    David Bergeron;David Bergeron;Maria L. Gorno-Tempini;Gil D. Rabinovici;Miguel A. Santos-Santos

  • Youthful memory capacity in old brains: Anatomic and genetic clues from the northwestern superaging project

    Emily J. Rogalski;Tamar Gefen;Junzi Shi;Mehrnoosh Samimi

  • Morphometric and Histologic Substrates of Cingulate Integrity in Elders with Exceptional Memory Capacity

    Tamar Gefen;Melanie Peterson;Steven T. Papastefan;Adam Martersteck

  • Neurology of anomia in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia

    Marsel Mesulam;Emily Rogalski;Christina Wieneke;Derin Cobia

  • Clinically concordant variations of Alzheimer pathology in aphasic versus amnestic dementia.

    Tamar Gefen;Katherine Gasho;Alfred Rademaker;Mona Lalehzari

  • Utility of the global CDR® plus NACC FTLD rating and development of scoring rules: Data from the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Consortium.

    Toji Miyagawa;Danielle Brushaber;Jeremy Syrjanen;Walter Kremers

  • Challenges and Opportunities with Causal Discovery Algorithms: Application to Alzheimer's Pathophysiology.

    Xinpeng Shen;Sisi Ma;Prashanthi Vemuri;Gyorgy Simon

  • Rate of entorhinal and hippocampal atrophy in incipient and mild AD: Relation to memory function

    T.R. Stoub;E.J. Rogalski;S. Leurgans;D.A. Bennett

  • Increased Frequency of Learning Disability in Patients With Primary Progressive Aphasia and Their First-Degree Relatives

    Emily Rogalski;Nancy Johnson;Sandra Weintraub;Marsel Mesulam

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub Northwestern University
M.-Marsel Mesulam
M.-Marsel Mesulam Northwestern University
Alfred W. Rademaker
Alfred W. Rademaker Northwestern University
Changiz Geula
Changiz Geula Northwestern University
Cynthia K. Thompson
Cynthia K. Thompson Northwestern University
Arthur W. Toga
Arthur W. Toga University of Southern California
Mario F. Mendez
Mario F. Mendez University of California, Los Angeles
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
David T. W. Jones
David T. W. Jones German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens the door to a wide range of meaningful career options. Many students enhance their neuroscience background by pursuing relevant online degrees, which can be more flexible and affordable.

For those interested in mental health counseling, a masters in marriage and family therapy online can provide clinical skills necessary for supporting families and couples. If you want a broader focus on mental health treatment and research, consider one of the affordable online masters in clinical psychology programs, which serve as a strong complement to neuroscience studies.

Those just starting their academic journey can explore a bachelors in psychology online, an ideal pathway to build foundational understanding before advancing to graduate work in neuroscience or related professions.

If you're interested in social work and supporting individuals through major life challenges, there are numerous online msw programs that welcome applicants from neuroscience backgrounds.

Each of these online degree options allows you to integrate neuroscience with clinical, counseling, or social work practice, leading to diverse and rewarding career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Emily Rogalski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles