World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
6438
World Ranking
5135
National Ranking
1754

Eliška Rejmánková publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliška Rejmánková sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 126 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Eliška Rejmánková D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliška Rejmánková sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eliška Rejmánková is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with particular emphasis on Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Cell Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Molecular Biology.

Their scholarly output includes numerous papers exploring aquatic ecosystems, microbial ecology, and related topics. Recent publications illustrate a range of interests from harmful algal blooms affecting fisher communities to the microbiomes associated with invasive and native aquatic plants.

  • Harmful Algal Blooms Threaten the Health of Peri-Urban Fisher Communities: A Case Study in Kisumu Bay, Lake Victoria, Kenya (2020, Exposure and Health)
  • The role of macrophyte-associated microbiomes in lacustrine wetlands: an example of the littoral zone of lake Atitlan, Guatemala (2022, Hydrobiologia)
  • Complex phyllosphere microbiome aids in the establishment of the invasive macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata (L.) under conditions of nitrogen scarcity (2021, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])
  • Forbs from seasonal managed wetlands boost plankton production more than emergent graminoids by supplying novel labile detritus (2024, Freshwater Biology)
  • Childhood parasitic infections and gastrointestinal illness in indigenous communities at Lake Atitlán, Guatemala (2021, PeerJ)

Frequent co-authors in Rejmánková's work include Amber Roegner, Caio César Pires de Paula, Jiří Bárta, Qiang Lin, and Iva Kohoutová. Collaborations with these researchers have resulted in multiple publications, illustrating consistent scientific partnerships.

The research has been published in several venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary engagement across environmental and biological sciences. Key publication venues include:

  • Exposure and Health
  • Hydrobiologia
  • Freshwater Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PeerJ

The main fields of study centered on Environmental Science encompass multiple subfields:

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Cell Biology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Molecular Biology

Major research topics addressed by Rejmánková include:

  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
  • Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies

Best Publications

  • Remote Sensing as a Landscape Epidemiologic Tool to Identify Villages at High Risk for Malaria Transmission

    L R Beck;M H Rodriguez;S W Dister;A D Rodriguez

  • Linking environmental nutrient enrichment and disease emergence in humans and wildlife

    Pieter T. J. Johnson;Alan R. Townsend;Cory C. Cleveland;Patricia M. Glibert

  • Wetland plant decomposition under different nutrient conditions: what is more important, litter quality or site quality?

    Eliška Rejmánková;Kateřina Houdková

  • Detecting seasonal flooding cycles in marshes of the Yucatan Peninsula with SIR-C polarimetric radar imagery

    Kevin O. Pope;Eliska Rejmankova;Jack F. Paris;Robert Woodruff

  • MONITORING PACIFIC COAST SALT MARSHES USING REMOTE SENSING

    M. Zhang;S. L. Ustin;E. Rejmankova;E. W. Sanderson

  • Weed-Crop Competition: Experimental Designs and Models for Data Analysis'

    Marcel Rejmánek;George R. Robinson;Eliska Rejmánková

  • PRODUCTION, CHEMICAL QUALITY AND USE OF DUCKWEEDS (LEMNACEAE) IN AQUACULTURE, WASTE MANAGEMENT, AND ANIMAL FEEDS

    Dudley D. Culley;Eliska Rejmánková;Jan Květ;J. B. Frye

  • The role of macrophytes in wetland ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Wetland macrophyte decomposition under different nutrient conditions : Relationships between decomposition rate, enzyme activities and microbial biomass

    Eliška Rejmánková;Dagmara Sirová

  • MOSQUITO HABITATS, LAND USE, AND MALARIA RISK IN BELIZE FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY

    Kevin Pope;Penny Masuoka;Eliska Rejmankova;John Grieco

  • Predictions of malaria vector distribution in Belize based on multispectral satellite data

    Donald R. Roberts;Jack F. Paris;Sylvie Manguin;Ralph E. Harbach

  • Nutrient resorption in wetland macrophytes: comparison across several regions of different nutrient status.

    Unknown

  • A function of cyanobacterial mats in phosphorus-limited tropical wetlands.

    Eliska Rejmánková;Jaroslava Komárková

  • Predictions of adult Anopheles albimanus densities in villages based on distances to remotely sensed larval habitats.

    Eliska Rejmankova;Donald R. Roberts;Anitra Pawley;Sylvie Manguin

  • MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN HABITATS, ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AND OCCURRENCE OF ANOPHELINE MOSQUITO LARVAE ANOPHELES ALBIMANUS AND A. PSEUDOPUNCTIPENNIS IN SOUTHERN CHIAPAS, MEXICO

    E. Rejmankova;M. Rejmanek

  • IMPACTS OF LAND USE ON NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTION AND VEGETATION COMPOSITION OF FRESHWATER WETLANDS IN NORTHERN BELIZE

    Sarah Johnson;Eliška Rejmánková

  • Remote sensing of tropical wetlands for malaria control in Chiapas, Mexico.

    Kevin O. Pope;Eliska Rejmankova;Harry M. Savage;Juan I. Arredondo-Jimenez

  • Microbial community development in the traps of aquatic Utricularia species

    Dagmara Sirová;Jakub Borovec;Barbora Černá;Eliška Rejmánková

  • Characterization of Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) larval habitats in Belize, Central America

    Sylvie Manguin;Donald R. Roberts;Richard G. Andre;Eliska Rejmankova

  • A Conceptual Framework to Develop Long-Term Ecological Research and Management Objectives in the Wider Caribbean Region

    Victor H. Rivera-Monroy;Robert R. Twilley;David Bone;Daniel L. Childers

  • Environmental and Regional Determinants of Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) Larval Distribution in Belize, Central America

    E. Rejmankova;D. R. Roberts;R. E. Harbach;J. Pecor

  • Herbaceous Wetlands of the Yucatan Peninsula: Communities at Extreme Ends of Environmental Gradients

    Eliška Rejmankova;Kevin O. Pope;Rebecca Post;Edward Maltby

  • Response of emergent macrophytes to experimental nutrient and salinity additions

    P. Macek;E. Rejmánková

Frequent Co-Authors

Sylvie Manguin
Sylvie Manguin Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Marcel Rejmánek
Marcel Rejmánek University of California, Davis
Jiří Komárek
Jiří Komárek University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Ralph E. Harbach
Ralph E. Harbach Natural History Museum
Susan L. Ustin
Susan L. Ustin University of California, Davis
Hana Šantrůčková
Hana Šantrůčková University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Eric W. Sanderson
Eric W. Sanderson Wildlife Conservation Society
Richard M. Higashi
Richard M. Higashi University of Kentucky
Lubomír Adamec
Lubomír Adamec Czech Academy of Sciences
Michael J. Bangs
Michael J. Bangs Kasetsart University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in careers that connect science, health, and the environment, you’ll find a range of flexible online degree options in the USA. Many students explore programs that don’t just focus on Ecology and Evolution, but also lead to impactful roles in healthcare and research.

For example, accelerated nursing degrees attract those seeking career flexibility and growth. If you want to learn how to become a nurse practitioner quickly, new online pathways can help you achieve your goals efficiently.

There are also nursing bridge programs such as the 6 month rn to bsn program and rn to np programs for those looking to level up their qualifications while balancing work or family commitments.

Even if you don’t already have a nursing background, online direct entry msn options make it possible to transition into nursing from other fields, including the sciences. These versatile degrees open up diverse pathways that integrate ecological knowledge and health sciences, broadening your future career choices.

Best Scientists Citing Eliška Rejmánková

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles