World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
39
Citations
6272
World Ranking
2124
National Ranking
783

Bryan Cheeseman publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Cheeseman sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 115 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Bryan Cheeseman D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Cheeseman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bryan Cheeseman is affiliated with the United States Army Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Engineering, with particular attention to subfields such as Radiation and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's work focuses on topics including Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Nuclear Physics and Applications, and Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques. These areas represent the core of their research interests and contributions to scientific knowledge.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled "Very Low-Intensity Throughput X-Ray Computed Tomography of a Cast FeMnAl Steel Alloy," published in 2020 in the Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems.

  • Very Low-Intensity Throughput X-Ray Computed Tomography of a Cast FeMnAl Steel Alloy (2020), Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems

Bryan Cheeseman has collaborated with several frequent co-authors throughout their research career, notably:

  • William H. Green
  • Daniel Field
  • Krista R. Limmer

The scientist's publication venues include:

  • Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems

Best Publications

  • Ballistic impact into fabric and compliant composite laminates

    Bryan A. Cheeseman;Travis A. Bogetti

  • Some recent advances in the fabrication and design of three-dimensional textile preforms: a review

    Ryuta Kamiya;Bryan A Cheeseman;Peter Popper;Tsu-Wei Chou

  • Modeling friction effects on the ballistic impact behavior of a single-ply high-strength fabric

    Y. Duan;M. Keefe;T.A. Bogetti;B.A. Cheeseman

  • A numerical investigation of the influence of friction on energy absorption by a high-strength fabric subjected to ballistic impact

    Y. Duan;M. Keefe;T.A. Bogetti;B.A. Cheeseman

  • Mechanics of textile composites: Micro-geometry

    Yuyang Miao;Eric Zhou;Youqi Wang;Bryan A. Cheeseman

  • Modeling the role of friction during ballistic impact of a high-strength plain-weave fabric

    Y. Duan;M. Keefe;T.A. Bogetti;B.A. Cheeseman

  • Computational Investigation of Impact Energy Absorption Capability of Polyurea Coatings via Deformation-Induced Glass Transition

    M. Grujicic;B. Pandurangan;T. He;B.A. Cheeseman

  • A ballistic material model for cross-plied unidirectional ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene fiber-reinforced armor-grade composites

    M. Grujicic;G. Arakere;T. He;W.C. Bell

  • Digital element approach for simulating impact and penetration of textiles

    Youqi Wang;Yuyang Miao;Daniel Swenson;Bryan A. Cheeseman

  • A computational analysis of the ballistic performance of light-weight hybrid composite armors

    M. Grujicic;B. Pandurangan;K.L. Koudela;B.A. Cheeseman

  • Material Modeling and Ballistic-Resistance Analysis of Armor-Grade Composites Reinforced with High-Performance Fibers

    M. Grujicic;P. S. Glomski;T. He;G. Arakere

  • Experimental investigation of the quasi-static fracture of functionally graded materials

    H Li;J Lambros;B.A Cheeseman;M.H Santare

  • Parameterization of the porous-material model for sand with different levels of water saturation

    M. Grujicic;B. Pandurangan;R. Qiao;B.A. Cheeseman

  • Modeling of AA5083 Material-Microstructure Evolution During Butt Friction-Stir Welding

    M. Grujicic;G. Arakere;H. V. Yalavarthy;T. He

  • Modeling of ballistic-failure mechanisms in gas metal arc welds of mil a46100 armor-grade steel

    Mica Grujicic;Subrahmanian Ramaswami;Jennifer Snipes;Rohan Galgalikar

  • Computational Investigation of Hardness Evolution During Friction-Stir Welding of AA5083 and AA2139 Aluminum Alloys

    M. Grujicic;G. Arakere;C.-F. Yen;B. A. Cheeseman

  • Molecular-level simulations of shock generation and propagation in polyurea

    Mica Grujicic;B. Pandurangan;W. C. Bell;B. A. Cheeseman

  • Fully coupled thermomechanical finite element analysis of material evolution during friction-stir welding of AA5083

    M Grujicic;T He;G Arakere;H V Yalavarthy

  • Filament-Level Modeling of Aramid-Based High-Performance Structural Materials

    M. Grujicic;W. C. Bell;P. S. Glomski;B. Pandurangan

  • Ballistic Performance of Alumina/S‐2 Glass‐reinforced Polymer‐matrix Composite Hybrid Lightweight Armor Against Armor Piercing (ap) and Non‐AP Projectiles

    M. Grujicic;B. Pandurangan;U. Zecevic;K.L. Koudela

Frequent Co-Authors

Mica Grujicic
Mica Grujicic Clemson University
Donald W. Brenner
Donald W. Brenner North Carolina State University
John W. Gillespie
John W. Gillespie University of Delaware
Anthony P. Reynolds
Anthony P. Reynolds University of South Carolina
Stefan Zauscher
Stefan Zauscher Duke University
Michael A. Sutton
Michael A. Sutton University of South Carolina
Farshid Guilak
Farshid Guilak Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering provide robust career opportunities, exploring related online degrees can broaden your skillset and career prospects. For those interested in branching into healthcare, especially speech and language therapy, it’s worth investigating if can you get a speech pathology degree online. This flexibility allows students to balance education with personal and professional commitments.

Cost is a major consideration when choosing an online program. Understanding the speech pathology online program cost can help prospective students and professionals budget effectively and assess the return on investment for their chosen path.

Veterans looking to transition into new careers might find specialized support through programs designed to meet their unique needs. The availability of a speech pathology degree online for veterans offers tailored opportunities that recognize military experience and facilitate smooth career shifts.

For those seeking to accelerate their education, options like the best 5 year speech pathology programs combine efficiency with quality, enabling students to enter the workforce more quickly without compromising on learning outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan Cheeseman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles