World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15533 14615 7831 7246 523 27287

David H. Berger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David H. Berger between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David H. Berger published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2010. 5 of the 572 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2010. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 44 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1971 2025

572 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David H. Berger: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 2
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 4
1989 3
1990 0
1991 4
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 2
1996 6
1997 6
1998 6
1999 6
2000 2
2001 3
2002 15
2003 16
2004 12
2005 19
2006 29
2007 25
2008 21
2009 28
2010 44
2011 32
2012 23
2013 27
2014 33
2015 20
2016 19
2017 42
2018 24
2019 24
2020 29
2021 27
2022 4
2023 0
2024 3
2025 2
Total 572
Download as CSV

David H. Berger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Berger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 523 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 523
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David H. Berger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Berger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David H. Berger is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on mathematics and economics, econometrics, and finance.

Their work covers several subfields of study, including:

  • Mathematical Physics
  • Finance
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Key topics investigated by Berger include:

  • Stochastic processes and financial applications
  • Probability and Risk Models
  • Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations
  • Advanced mathematical theories
  • Advanced Banach Space Theory
  • Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
  • Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics

Berger's recent publications demonstrate a focus on stochastic processes, non-local operators, and Fourier multiplier theory. Notable papers include:

  • "On the Liouville and strong Liouville properties for a class of non-local operators," 2022, MATHEMATICA SCANDINAVICA
  • "Lévy driven CARMA generalized processes and stochastic partial differential equations," 2020, Stochastic Processes and their Applications
  • "Lévy Processes, Generalized Moments and Uniform Integrability," 2022, Probability and Mathematical Statistics
  • "Quasi-infinite divisibility of a class of distributions with discrete part," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The Liouville theorem for a class of Fourier multipliers and its connection to coupling," 2024, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society

Berger's publications are frequently found in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • MATHEMATICA SCANDINAVICA
  • Stochastic Processes and their Applications
  • Probability and Mathematical Statistics
  • Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society

Frequent collaborators include:

  • René L. Schilling
  • Eugene Shargorodsky
  • Franziska Kühn
  • Merve Kutlu
  • Farid Sh. Mohamed

Best Publications

  • Chlorhexidine–Alcohol versus Povidone–Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis

    Rabih O. Darouiche;Matthew J. Wall;Kamal M F Itani;Mary F. Otterson

  • Perineural invasion in cancer: A review of the literature

    Catherine Liebig;Gustavo Ayala;Jonathan A. Wilks;David H. Berger

  • Association Between Implementation of a Medical Team Training Program and Surgical Mortality

    Julia Neily;Peter D. Mills;Peter D. Mills;Yinong Young-Xu;Yinong Young-Xu;Brian T. Carney

  • Spatially organized multicellular immune hubs in human colorectal cancer

    Karin Pelka;Matan Hofree;Jonathan H. Chen;Siranush Sarkizova

  • Altered reinforcement mechanisms in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Terje Sagvolden;Heidi Aase;Pål Zeiner;David Berger

  • Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer.

    Catherine Liebig;Gustavo Ayala;Jonathan Wilks;Gordana Verstovsek

  • Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training.

    Samir S. Awad;Shawn P. Fagan;Charles Bellows;Daniel Albo

  • Erratum to: 36th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: Brussels, Belgium. 15-18 March 2016

    R. M. Bateman;M. D. Sharpe;J. E. Jagger;C. G. Ellis

  • Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With FOLFIRINOX in Combination With Losartan Followed by Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

    Janet E. Murphy;Jennifer Y. Wo;David P. Ryan;Jeffrey W. Clark

  • Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review

    Mike K. Liang;Mike K. Liang;Julie L. Holihan;Kamal Itani;Zeinab M. Alawadi

  • Infectious postoperative complications decrease long-term survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer: a study of 12,075 patients.

    Avo Artinyan;Sonia Orcutt;Daniel Anaya;Peter Richardson

  • Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Repair With Mesh for the Treatment of Ventral Incisional Hernia: A Randomized Trial

    Kamal M. F. Itani;Kwan Hur;Lawrence T. Kim;Thomas Anthony

  • Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients

    Neil Farnsworth;Shawn P. Fagan;David H. Berger;Samir S. Awad

  • Carcinoma in the porcelain gallbladder: a relationship revisited.

    Antonia E. Stephen;David L. Berger

  • Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection.

    Antonia E. Stephen;David L. Berger

  • Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pulmonary Artery Catheterization

    Michael F. Roizen;David L. Berger;Ronald A. Gabel;John Gerson

  • Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: Staplers do not decrease fistula rates

    Cristina R. Ferrone;Andrew L. Warshaw;David W. Rattner;David Berger

  • Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing.

    David M. Friedman;Suzanne M. Sokal;Yuchiao Chang;David L. Berger

  • Postoperative complications after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Incidence and treatment.

    D. Berger;M. Bientzle;A. Müller

Frequent Co-Authors

Jukka Takala
Jukka Takala University of Bern
David P. Ryan
David P. Ryan Harvard University
T. ten Brummelaar
T. ten Brummelaar Georgia State University
Cristina R. Ferrone
Cristina R. Ferrone Harvard University
Nils H. Turner
Nils H. Turner Georgia State University
David W. Rattner
David W. Rattner Harvard University
Jeffrey W. Clark
Jeffrey W. Clark Harvard University
Harold A. McAlister
Harold A. McAlister Georgia State University
Kamal M.F. Itani
Kamal M.F. Itani Boston University
Yuchiao Chang
Yuchiao Chang Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure if a traditional medical degree is the right fit? There are several flexible online pathways to jumpstart your career in medicine and healthcare, each offering unique roles and responsibilities.

For those drawn to healthcare administration, medical billing and coding online courses provide a fast track into this in-demand field. These programs teach essential skills for managing patient data, insurance claims, and healthcare records, opening doors to entry-level positions in hospitals and clinics.

Aspiring nurses have a variety of options, from discovering how much is online nursing school to pursuing advanced degrees. If you're looking to specialize, check out the cheapest nurse practitioner programs. Nurse practitioners deliver frontline patient care, often with more autonomy and responsibility than registered nurses.

For those aiming for leadership roles or academic research, online nursing phd programs allow you to advance your expertise and impact healthcare at a higher level.

These online programs offer flexibility and affordability, making careers in healthcare accessible to a wider audience than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing David H. Berger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles