World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
11652
World Ranking
5063
National Ranking
2268

Edwin M. Meyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin M. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 157 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Edwin M. Meyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin M. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edwin M. Meyer is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, complemented by work in environmental science.

Their scholarly output includes significant contributions to subfields such as molecular biology, ecology, biomedical engineering, plant science, and oceanography. Meyer's work focuses on various topics, including protist diversity and phylogeny, genomics and phylogenetic studies, microbial community ecology and physiology, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, chromosomal and genetic variations, microfluidic and bio-sensing technologies, and pluripotent stem cells research.

Meyer has published extensively in several notable venues. These include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • PLoS Biology

Frequent collaborators in Meyer's research include Olivier Arnaiz, Linda Sperling, Simran Bhullar, Arnaud Couloux, and Sophie Malinsky.

Representative recent publications by Meyer involve topics ranging from genome dynamics to cell sorting and mating-type determination mechanisms. Notable works include:

  • "Massive colonization of protein-coding exons by selfish genetic elements in Paramecium germline genomes" (2021, PLoS Biology)
  • "Dynamics of Gene Loss following Ancient Whole-Genome Duplication in the Cryptic Paramecium Complex" (2023, Molecular Biology and Evolution)
  • "Evaluating the Effects of Cell Sorting on Gene Expression" (2020, Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT)
  • "Evolutionary Plasticity of Mating-Type Determination Mechanisms in Paramecium aurelia Sibling Species" (2020, Genome Biology and Evolution)
  • "Cell Sorter Cleaning Practices and Their Impact on Instrument Sterility" (2022, Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT)

Best Publications

  • Ovarian steroid deprivation results in a reversible learning impairment and compromised cholinergic function in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

    Meharvan Singh;Edwin M. Meyer;William J. Millard;James W. Simpkins

  • The effect of ovariectomy and estradiol replacement on brain-derived neurotrophic factor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in cortical and hippocampal brain regions of female Sprague-Dawley rats.

    Meharvan Singh;E. M. Meyer;J. W. Simpkins

  • Neuron-specific transduction in the rat septohippocampal or nigrostriatal pathway by recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors

    Ronald L. Klein;Edwin M. Meyer;Alyson L. Peel;Sergei Zolotukhin

  • Characterization of a series of anabaseine-derived compounds reveals that the 3-(4)-dimethylaminocinnamylidine derivative is a selective agonist at neuronal nicotinic alpha 7/125I-alpha-bungarotoxin receptor subtypes.

    C M de Fiebre;E M Meyer;J C Henry;S I Muraskin

  • Dopaminergic Cell Loss Induced by Human A30P α-Synuclein Gene Transfer to the Rat Substantia Nigra

    Ronald L. Klein;Michael A. King;Mary E. Hamby;Edwin M. Meyer

  • Nicotinic α7 receptors protect against glutamate neurotoxicity and neuronal ischemic damage

    S. Shimohama;D. L. Greenwald;D. H. Shafron;A. Akaika

  • Long-term neuropathological and neurochemical effects of nucleus basalis lesions in the rat

    Gary W. Arendash;William J. Millard;Adrian J. Dunn;Edwin M. Meyer

  • 3-[2,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene]anabaseine (DMXB) selectively activates rat α7 receptors and improves memory-related behaviors in a mecamylamine-sensitive manner

    Edwin M Meyer;Ee Tein Tay;Roger L Papke;Craig Meyers

  • A novel nicotinic agonist facilitates induction of long-term potentiation in the rat hippocampus

    Bruce E. Hunter;Christopher M. de Fiebre;Roger L. Papke;William R. Kem

  • Dose and promoter effects of adeno-associated viral vector for green fluorescent protein expression in the rat brain.

    Ronald L. Klein;Mary E. Hamby;Yan Gong;Aaron C. Hirko

  • The antinociceptive effects of α7 nicotinic agonists in an acute pain model

    M.Imad Damaj;Edwin M Meyer;Billy R. Martin

  • Effects of ovariectomy and estradiol benzoate on high affinity choline uptake, ACh synthesis, and release from rat cerebral cortical synaptosomes

    Cecilia A. O'Malley;R. Dean Hautamaki;Mark Kelley;Edwin M. Meyer

  • Analysis of 3-(4-hydroxy, 2-Methoxybenzylidene)anabaseine selectivity and activity at human and rat alpha-7 nicotinic receptors.

    Edwin M. Meyer;Alexander Kuryatov;Volodymyr Gerzanich;Jon Lindstrom

  • Prevention of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced rotational behavior by BDNF somatic gene transfer.

    Ronald L. Klein;Mark H. Lewis;Nicholas Muzyczka;Edwin M. Meyer

  • Induction of uncoupling protein 1 by central interleukin-6 gene delivery is dependent on sympathetic innervation of brown adipose tissue and underlies one mechanism of body weight reduction in rats.

    G Li;R.L Klein;M Matheny;M Matheny;M.A King

  • CD9 Is Associated with Leukemia Inhibitory Factor-mediated Maintenance of Embryonic Stem Cells

    Masahiro Oka;Kenichi Tagoku;Thomas L. Russell;Yuka Nakano

  • Characterization of the neuroprotective and toxic effects of α7 nicotinic receptor activation in PC12 cells

    Yangxin Li;Roger L Papke;Yun-Ju He;William J Millard

  • α7 Receptor-selective agonists and modes of α7 receptor activation

    Roger L. Papke;Edwin Meyer;Tom Nutter;Vladimir V. Uteshev

  • Effects of anabaseine-related analogs on rat brain nicotinic receptor binding and on avoidance behaviors

    Edwin M. Meyer;Christopher M. de Fiebre;Bruce E. Hunter;Christopher E. Simpkins

  • Correlations Between Na+‐K+ ATPase Activity and Acetylcholine Release in Rat Cortical Synaptosomes

    Unknown

  • Neuroprotective and memory-related actions of novel alpha-7 nicotinic agents with different mixed agonist/antagonist properties.

    E. M. Meyer;Ee Tein Tay;J. A. Zoltewicz;C. Meyers

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. King
Michael A. King University of Florida
Roger L. Papke
Roger L. Papke University of Florida
Ronald Klein
Ronald Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gary W. Arendash
Gary W. Arendash University of South Florida
Nicholas Muzyczka
Nicholas Muzyczka University of Florida
James W. Simpkins
James W. Simpkins West Virginia University
Adrian J. Dunn
Adrian J. Dunn Louisiana State University
Sergei Zolotukhin
Sergei Zolotukhin University of Florida
Naohiro Terada
Naohiro Terada University of Florida
Don W. Walker
Don W. Walker University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary careers—many of which can be pursued through flexible, online degree programs in related fields. For students interested in clinical practice and therapy, marriage and family therapy online programs accredited offer respected pathways to licensure and direct work with clients. If your interest leans towards psychology, an affordable online master's in psychology provides advanced training for research, counseling, or organizational roles.

Budget-conscious learners can also consider the cheapest online psychology degree options to gain foundational knowledge while minimizing student debt. Alternatively, for those drawn to social work, the easiest online msw program lists can help identify accessible entry points into the MSW pathway, preparing graduates for a wide array of community and healthcare roles.

These related degrees strengthen an understanding of human behavior and mental health—complementing a background in neuroscience and expanding career opportunities across healthcare, research, counseling, and academic environments.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin M. Meyer