World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4143 63 89 15900
Neuroscience 57 4288 194 93 16102

E. De Renzi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. De Renzi between 1962 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. De Renzi published across 59 years, from 1962 to 2020, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1982. 1 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1982. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 4 publications 1967: 3 publications 1968: 4 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 3 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1962 2020

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. De Renzi: publications per year, 1962 to 2020
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 1
1965 0
1966 4
1967 3
1968 4
1969 4
1970 1
1971 1
1972 3
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 4
1978 3
1979 1
1980 3
1981 2
1982 5
1983 3
1984 2
1985 2
1986 4
1987 4
1988 2
1989 5
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 3
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 97
Download as CSV

E. De Renzi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. De Renzi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 89
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

E. De Renzi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. De Renzi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

E. De Renzi was affiliated with the University of Milan in Italy and conducted research primarily in the areas of psychology, neuroscience, and engineering. Their scholarly output focused on both core and interdisciplinary fields, with specific attention to social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist contributed a notable paper titled "Features and problems of neuropsychology," published in 2020 in the journal Giornale italiano di psicologia. This publication reflected their engagement with neuropsychological topics and was part of their broader work intersecting psychological theory and applied neuroscience.

Their research addressed several key topics, including:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies

E. De Renzi collaborated regularly with P. Faglioni, indicating a research partnership that contributed to the development of their shared areas of expertise.

The primary venues for their published work included:

  • Giornale italiano di psicologia

Their interdisciplinary approach incorporated studies in:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Engineering

With subfields spanning:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

The focus of their work often revolved around the mechanisms of movement and perception, as evidenced by topics such as action observation, motor control, and electrophysiological methods like electromyography.

Throughout their career, E. De Renzi's research contributed to understanding complex interactions between cognitive processes and physiological responses within the brain and body, particularly related to motor functions and synchronization.

Best Publications

  • The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics.

    E. De Renzi;L. A. Vignolo

  • Normative Data and Screening Power of a Shortened Version of the Token Test

    E. De Renzi;P. Faglioni

  • Imitating Gestures: A Quantitative Approach to Ideomotor Apraxia

    De Renzi E;Motti F;Nichelli P

  • Verbal and non-verbal short-term memory impairment following hemispheric damage.

    Ennio De Renzi;Paolo Nichelli

  • Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere—An MRI and PET study and a review of the literature

    E. De Renzi;D. Perani;Giovanni A. Carlesimo;M. C. Silveri

  • Apperceptive and associative forms of prosopagnosia.

    E. De Renzi;P. Faglioni;D. Grossi;P. Nichelli

  • Ideational apraxia: A quantitative study

    E. De Renzi;A. Pieczuro;L.A. Vignolo

  • Modality-specific and supramodal mechanisms of apraxia

    E. De Renzi;P. Faglioni;P. Sorgato

  • Perceptual and associative disorders of visual recognition Relationship to the side of the cerebral lesion

    Ennio De Renzi;Giuseppe Scotti;Hans Spinnler

  • Are semantic systems separately represented in the brain? The case of living category impairment.

    E. De Renzi;F. Lucchelli

  • Bilateral paramedian thalamic artery infarcts: report of eight cases.

    M Gentilini;E De Renzi;G Crisi

  • Oral Apraxia and Aphasia

    E. De Renzi;A. Pieczuro;L.A. Vignolo

  • Prosopagnosia in two patients with CT scan evidence of damage confined to the right hemisphere.

    E De Renzi

  • Semantic amnesia with preservation of autobiographic memory. A case report.

    Ennio De Renzi;Mario Liotti;Paolo Nichelli

  • Spatial Memory and Hemispheric Locus of Lesion

    E. De Renzi;P. Faglioni;P. Previdi

  • Constructional Apraxia and Hemispheric Locus of Lesion

    Unknown

  • Hemispheric contribution to exploration of space through the visual and tactile modality.

    E. De Renzi;P. Faglioni;G. Scotti

  • The Performance of Patients with Unilateral Brain Damage on Face Recognition Tasks

    E. De Renzi;P. Faglioni;H. Spinnler

  • Slowly Progressive Visual Agnosia or Apraxia Without Dementia

    E De Renzi

  • Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect.

    E. De Renzi;M. Gentilini;P. Faglioni;C. Barbieri

  • Neuropsychological evidence for the existence of cerebral areas critical to the performance of intelligence tasks.

    A. Basso;E. De Renzi;P. Faglioni;G. Scotti

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Spinnler
Hans Spinnler University of Milan
Luigi A. Vignolo
Luigi A. Vignolo University of Brescia
Paolo Frigio Nichelli
Paolo Frigio Nichelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Daniela Perani
Daniela Perani Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Anna Basso
Anna Basso University of Milan
Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo University of Rome Tor Vergata
Maria Caterina Silveri
Maria Caterina Silveri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Dario Grossi
Dario Grossi University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
F. Fazio
F. Fazio University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens up a variety of career options in healthcare, research, education, and counseling. Many students interested in understanding the brain may also consider related fields such as psychology, counseling, or therapy. Online learning offers more flexible and affordable pathways to enter these professions.

For those aiming to help others with mental health challenges, pursuing the most affordable online masters in mental health counseling can be a practical first step. Similarly, students can explore the most affordable online counseling degrees to become qualified counselors while managing tuition costs.

If you are interested in relationships and therapy, earning an lmft degree (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist) online is also a cost-effective way to start your journey. For a broader approach to human behavior and cognition, an online psychology masters can provide additional research and clinical expertise.

Exploring these related online degrees can complement a neuroscience background and expand your professional opportunities in mental health, research, or clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing E. De Renzi

Recently Published Articles