World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
7546
World Ranking
4661
National Ranking
1338

Dieter Haemmerich publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Haemmerich sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 138 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Dieter Haemmerich D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Haemmerich sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter Haemmerich is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research contributions span several interdisciplinary fields including engineering, medicine, and materials science, with particular focus on biomedical engineering, biomaterials, and imaging techniques.

The main topics explored in their work encompass nanoparticle-based drug delivery, ultrasound and hyperthermia applications, and nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics. Additional areas of investigation include nanopore and nanochannel transport studies, advanced MRI techniques, spectroscopy techniques in biomedical and chemical research, and corneal surgery and treatments.

Their recent published papers demonstrate a focus on innovative drug delivery systems and hyperthermia as a therapeutic approach. Notable works include:

  • "Hyperthermia and smart drug delivery systems for solid tumor therapy," 2020, published in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
  • "Closed-loop trans-skull ultrasound hyperthermia leads to improved drug delivery from thermosensitive drugs and promotes changes in vascular transport dynamics in brain tumors," 2021, published in Theranostics
  • "Drug transport kinetics of intravascular triggered drug delivery systems," 2021, published in Communications Biology
  • "Review on electrospray nanoparticles for drug delivery: Exploring applications," 2024, published in Polymers for Advanced Technologies
  • "Externally triggered smart drug delivery system encapsulating idarubicin shows superior kinetics and enhances tumoral drug uptake and response," 2021, published in Theranostics

Frequently collaborating researchers include Krishna Kumar Ramajayam, Anjan Motamarry, Ann L.B. Seynhaeve, Timo L.M. ten Hagen, and Mohamadreza Amin. These collaborations have contributed to advancing research particularly in drug delivery technologies and hyperthermia-based therapeutic modalities.

Haemmerich's work has appeared repeatedly in prominent journals such as Cancers, Theranostics, the IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, International Journal of Hyperthermia, and Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. These publication venues reflect a diverse engagement with both medical and engineering-oriented scientific communities.

Best Publications

  • Three-dimensional finite-element analyses for radio-frequency hepatic tumor ablation

    S. Tungjitkusolmun;S.T. Staelin;D. Haemmerich;Jang-Zern Tsai

  • Review of temperature dependence of thermal properties, dielectric properties, and perfusion of biological tissues at hyperthermic and ablation temperatures.

    Christian Rossmanna;Dieter Haemmerich

  • In vivo electrical conductivity of hepatic tumours

    Dieter Haemmerich;S T Staelin;J Z Tsai;S Tungjitkusolmun

  • Mild hyperthermia triggered doxorubicin release from optimized stealth thermosensitive liposomes improves intratumoral drug delivery and efficacy.

    Li Li;Timo L.M. ten Hagen;Martin Hossann;Regine Süss

  • Hepatic radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled probes: effect of coolant temperature on lesion size

    D. Haemmerich;L. Chachati;A.S. Wright;D.M. Mahvi

  • Improved intratumoral nanoparticle extravasation and penetration by mild hyperthermia.

    Li Li;Timo L.M. ten Hagen;Michiel Bolkestein;Astrid Gasselhuber

  • Hyperthermia and smart drug delivery systems for solid tumor therapy

    A.L.B. Seynhaeve;M. Amin;D. Haemmerich;G.C. van Rhoon

  • Technologies for guidance of radiofrequency ablation in the multimodality interventional suite of the future.

    Bradford J. Wood;Julia K. Locklin;Anand Viswanathan;Jochen Kruecker

  • Targeted drug delivery by high intensity focused ultrasound mediated hyperthermia combined with temperature-sensitive liposomes: Computational modelling and preliminary in vivovalidation

    Astrid Gasselhuber;Matthew R Dreher;Ari Partanen;Pavel S Yarmolenko

  • Mild hyperthermia with magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for applications in drug delivery

    Ari Partanen;Pavel S. Yarmolenko;Antti Viitala;Sunil Appanaboyina

  • Multipolar electrode system for volumetric radiofrequency ablation

    Fred Lee;Dieter Haemmerich;John Webster;Andrew Wright

  • Effects of variation in perfusion rates and of perfusion models in computational models of radio frequency tumor ablation

    David J. Schutt;Dieter Haemmerich

  • Changes in electrical resistivity of swine liver after occlusion and postmortem

    D. Haemmerich;O. R. Ozkan;J. Z. Tsai;S. T. Staelin

  • Hepatic bipolar radio-frequency ablation between separated multiprong electrodes

    D. Haemmerich;T. Staelin;S. Tungjitkusolmun;F.T. Lee

  • Thermal tumour ablation: Devices, clinical applications and future directions

    D. Haemmerich;P. F. Laeseke

  • Electrical conductivity measurement of excised human metastatic liver tumours before and after thermal ablation

    Dieter Haemmerich;David J Schutt;Andrew S Wright;John G Webster

  • Finite-element analysis of hepatic multiple probe radio-frequency ablation

    D. Haemmerich;S. Tungjitkusolmun;S.T. Staelin;F.T. Lee

  • Hepatic bipolar radiofrequency ablation creates coagulation zones close to blood vessels: A finite element study

    Dieter Haemmerich;A. W. Wright;D. M. Mahvi;F. T. Lee

  • Contribution of direct heating, thermal conduction and perfusion during radiofrequency and microwave ablation.

    Wolfgang Schramm;Deshan Yang;Dieter Haemmerich

  • Mathematical spatio-temporal model of drug delivery from low temperature sensitive liposomes during radiofrequency tumour ablation.

    Astrid Gasselhuber;Matthew R. Dreher;Ayele Negussie;Bradford J. Wood

  • Comparison of Conventional Chemotherapy, Stealth Liposomes and Temperature-Sensitive Liposomes in a Mathematical Model

    Astrid Gasselhuber;Astrid Gasselhuber;Matthew R. Dreher;Frank Rattay;Bradford J. Wood

Frequent Co-Authors

john g webster
john g webster University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bradford J. Wood
Bradford J. Wood National Institutes of Health
Alexander M.M. Eggermont
Alexander M.M. Eggermont Institut Gustave Roussy
Gerard C. van Rhoon
Gerard C. van Rhoon Erasmus University Rotterdam
David L. Woods
David L. Woods University of California, Davis
Richard S. Finn
Richard S. Finn University of California, Los Angeles
Adriaan B. Houtsmuller
Adriaan B. Houtsmuller Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mark W. Kroll
Mark W. Kroll University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dieter Haemmerich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles