World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 131 223 207 147 135 681 62642
Medicine 131 2401 2236 1356 1244 682 62847

Dean D. Metcalfe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dean D. Metcalfe between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dean D. Metcalfe published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2002. 10 of the 710 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2002. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 16 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 15 publications 1989: 16 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 23 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 24 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 27 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications
1972 2025

710 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dean D. Metcalfe: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 6
1981 1
1982 5
1983 10
1984 12
1985 16
1986 6
1987 7
1988 15
1989 16
1990 10
1991 23
1992 11
1993 16
1994 14
1995 9
1996 24
1997 13
1998 17
1999 13
2000 19
2001 18
2002 27
2003 23
2004 22
2005 16
2006 21
2007 18
2008 19
2009 19
2010 14
2011 22
2012 14
2013 16
2014 16
2015 21
2016 17
2017 13
2018 16
2019 17
2020 14
2021 19
2022 27
2023 23
2024 7
2025 3
Total 710
Download as CSV

Dean D. Metcalfe publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean D. Metcalfe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 672–681 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 681 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13 681
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Dean D. Metcalfe D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean D. Metcalfe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 130–131 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 131 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16 131
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Dean D. Metcalfe is affiliated with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the United States. Their research contributions primarily span medicine, immunology, and microbiology, with a specialized focus on immunology, immunology and allergy, rheumatology, physiology, and molecular biology.

Their work centers on several main topics including mast cells and histamine, food allergy and anaphylaxis research, urticaria and related conditions, asthma and respiratory diseases, polyamine metabolism and applications, melanin and skin pigmentation, and allergic rhinitis and sensitization.

Frequent publication venues for Metcalfe include the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, Frontiers in Immunology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, and Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology.

Metcalfe has collaborated extensively with several co-authors including Melody C. Carter, Peter Valent, Cem Akin, Jonathan J. Lyons, and Michel Arock.

Recent papers authored by Metcalfe include:

  • Updated Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Mast Cell Disorders: A Consensus Proposal, 2021, HemaSphere
  • Heritable risk for severe anaphylaxis associated with increased α-tryptase-encoding germline copy number at TPSAB1, 2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Mast cells as a unique hematopoietic lineage and cell system: From Paul Ehrlich's visions to precision medicine concepts, 2020, Theranostics
  • The ingenious mast cell: Contemporary insights into mast cell behavior and function, 2021, Allergy
  • Diagnosis, Classification and Management of Mast Cell Activation Syndromes (MCAS) in the Era of Personalized Medicine, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Among recognitions, Metcalfe is a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Second Symposium on the Definition and Management of Anaphylaxis: Summary Report—Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network Symposium

    Hugh A Sampson;Anne Muñoz-Furlong;Ronna L Campbell;N Franklin Adkinson

  • IgE, Mast Cells, Basophils, and Eosinophils

    Kelly D. Stone;Calman Prussin;Dean D. Metcalfe

  • Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal

    Peter Valent;Hans P. Horny;Luis Escribano;B. Jack Longley

  • Identification of a point mutation in the catalytic domain of the protooncogene c-kit in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients who have mastocytosis with an associated hematologic disorder

    Hiroshi Nagata;Alexandra S. Worobec;Chad K. Oh;Badrul A. Chowdhury

  • Tryptase Levels as an Indicator of Mast-Cell Activation in Systemic Anaphylaxis and Mastocytosis

    Lawrence B. Schwartz;Dean D. Metcalfe;Jeffrey S. Miller;Harry Earl

  • Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) as an office procedure: a manual.

    S A Bock;H A Sampson;F M Atkins;R S Zeiger

  • Standards and standardization in mastocytosis: consensus statements on diagnostics, treatment recommendations and response criteria.

    P. Valent;C. Akin;L. Escribano;M. Födinger

  • Activating and dominant inactivating c-KIT catalytic domain mutations in distinct clinical forms of human mastocytosis

    B. Jack Longley;B. Jack Longley;Dean D. Metcalfe;Michael Tharp;Xiaomei Wang

  • Detection of intracytoplasmic cytokine using flow cytometry and directly conjugated anti-cytokine antibodies.

    Calman Prussin;Dean D. Metcalfe

  • Characterization of novel stem cell factor responsive human mast cell lines LAD 1 and 2 established from a patient with mast cell sarcoma/leukemia; activation following aggregation of FcεRI or FcγRI

    Arnold S. Kirshenbaum;Cem Akin;Yalin Wu;Menachem Rottem

  • Mastocytosis: 2016 updated WHO classification and novel emerging treatment concepts

    Peter Valent;Cem Akin;Dean D. Metcalfe

  • Definitions, Criteria and Global Classification of Mast Cell Disorders with Special Reference to Mast Cell Activation Syndromes: A Consensus Proposal

    Peter Valent;Cem Akin;Michel Arock;Knut Brockow

  • Mast cells and mastocytosis

    Dean D. Metcalfe

  • The c-KIT mutation causing human mastocytosis is resistant to STI571 and other KIT kinase inhibitors; kinases with enzymatic site mutations show different inhibitor sensitivity profiles than wild-type kinases and those with regulatory-type mutations.

    Yongsheng Ma;Shan Zeng;Dean D. Metcalfe;Cem Akin

  • Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants

    Dean D. Metcalfe;James D. Astwood;Rod Townsend;Hugh A. Sampson

  • Symposium on the Definition and Management of Anaphylaxis: Summary report

    Hugh A. Sampson;Anne Muñoz-Furlong;S. Allan Bock;Cara Schmitt

  • Mast cells in innate immunity.

    Yoseph A. Mekori;Dean D. Metcalfe

  • Anaphylaxis—a practice parameter update 2015

    Phillip Lieberman;Richard A. Nicklas;Christopher Randolph;John Oppenheimer

  • Elevated serum tryptase levels identify a subset of patients with a myeloproliferative variant of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome associated with tissue fibrosis, poor prognosis, and imatinib responsiveness.

    Amy D. Klion;Amy D. Klion;Pierre Noel;Pierre Noel;Cem Akin;Cem Akin;Melissa A. Law;Melissa A. Law

  • Induction of mast cell proliferation, maturation, and heparin synthesis by the rat c-kit ligand, stem cell factor.

    Mindy Tsai;Takashi Takeishi;Helen Thompson;Keith E. Langley

Frequent Co-Authors

Alasdair M. Gilfillan
Alasdair M. Gilfillan National Institutes of Health
Cem Akin
Cem Akin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael A. Beaven
Michael A. Beaven National Institutes of Health
Ana Olivera
Ana Olivera National Institutes of Health
Peter Valent
Peter Valent Medical University of Vienna
Lawrence B. Schwartz
Lawrence B. Schwartz Virginia Commonwealth University
Karin Hartmann
Karin Hartmann University Hospital of Basel
Hugh A. Sampson
Hugh A. Sampson Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Knut Brockow
Knut Brockow Technical University of Munich
Jason Gotlib
Jason Gotlib Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, exploring related healthcare degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students find that nursing programs provide a solid foundation, combining clinical expertise with patient care. If you’re looking to start quickly, checking out the best easiest LPN programs to get into can be a practical first step. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) qualifications often serve as a gateway to advanced nursing roles.

For those aiming higher, nurse practitioner programs offer advanced clinical skills and specialization options, including areas closely linked with Immunology, such as psychiatric nursing. Students can find programs tailored to their needs by exploring the easiest nurse practitioner degree programs, which balance accessibility and quality education.

Specialized pathways such as psychiatric mental health nursing are especially relevant for those interested in the immune system's impact on mental health. The best online PMHNP programs offer excellent clinical placement rates, ensuring practical experience alongside theoretical learning.

Affordability is also a key consideration. Prospective students should explore the cheapest psychiatric nurse practitioner programs to find cost-effective options without compromising on the quality needed for a successful healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Dean D. Metcalfe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles