World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
6437
World Ranking
6989
National Ranking
234

Michiko Narita publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiko Narita sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 156 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michiko Narita D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiko Narita sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michiko Narita is affiliated with Tokyo Medical University in Japan and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their research covers a variety of subfields including molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, psychiatry and mental health, and behavioral neuroscience.

Their work frequently appears in notable publication venues such as the Proceedings for Annual Meeting of The Japanese Pharmacological Society, Molecular Brain, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, British Journal of Cancer, and PAIN RESEARCH.

Recent significant papers by Michiko Narita include:

  • Direct evidence that the brain reward system is involved in the control of scratching behaviors induced by acute and chronic itch (2020, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications)
  • Relief of neuropathic pain by cell-specific manipulation of nucleus accumbens dopamine D1- and D2-receptor-expressing neurons (2022, Molecular Brain)
  • Histone modification of pain-related gene expression in spinal cord neurons under a persistent postsurgical pain-like state by electrocautery (2021, Molecular Brain)
  • Tumor suppression and improvement in immune systems by specific activation of dopamine D1-receptor-expressing neurons in the nucleus accumbens (2022, Molecular Brain)
  • Possible mechanism for improving the endogenous immune system through the blockade of peripheral μ-opioid receptors by treatment with naldemedine (2022, British Journal of Cancer)

The main research topics Michiko Narita focuses on include:

  • Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects

Frequent collaborators in their research comprise Naoko Kuzumaki, Minoru Narita, Yusuke Hamada, Yukari Suda, and Tomohisa Mori, with collaboration counts ranging from 9 to 23 joint works.

Best Publications

  • Direct involvement of orexinergic systems in the activation of the mesolimbic dopamine pathway and related behaviors induced by morphine.

    Minoru Narita;Yasuyuki Nagumo;Seiko Hashimoto;Michiko Narita

  • Hippocampal epigenetic modification at the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene induced by an enriched environment

    Naoko Kuzumaki;Daigo Ikegami;Rie Tamura;Nana Hareyama

  • Direct evidence for the involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the development of a neuropathic pain-like state in mice.

    Yoshinori Yajima;Minoru Narita;Aiko Usui;Chihiro Kaneko

  • Direct Evidence of Astrocytic Modulation in the Development of Rewarding Effects Induced by Drugs of Abuse

    Minoru Narita;Mayumi Miyatake;Michiko Narita;Masahiro Shibasaki

  • Epigenetic transcriptional activation of monocyte chemotactic protein 3 contributes to long-lasting neuropathic pain.

    Satoshi Imai;Daigo Ikegami;Akira Yamashita;Toshikazu Shimizu

  • Suppression of the morphine-induced rewarding effect in the rat with neuropathic pain: implication of the reduction in mu-opioid receptor functions in the ventral tegmental area.

    Satoru Ozaki;Minoru Narita;Michiko Narita;Masahiko Iino

  • Direct evidence for spinal cord microglia in the development of a neuropathic pain‐like state in mice

    Minoru Narita;Takuya Yoshida;Mayumi Nakajima;Michiko Narita

  • Inhibition of protein kinase C, but not of protein kinase A, blocks the development of acute antinociceptive tolerance to an intrathecally administered μ-opioid receptor agonist in the mouse

    Minoru Narita;Michiko Narita;Hirokazu Mizoguchi;Leon F. Tseng

  • Involvement of a spinal brain-derived neurotrophic factor/full-length TrkB pathway in the development of nerve injury-induced thermal hyperalgesia in mice

    Yoshinori Yajima;Minoru Narita;Michiko Narita;Nozomi Matsumoto

  • Memory impairment associated with a dysfunction of the hippocampal cholinergic system induced by prenatal and neonatal exposures to bisphenol-A.

    Kazuya Miyagawa;Minoru Narita;Michiko Narita;Hisahiko Akama

  • Enhanced IL-1beta production in response to the activation of hippocampal glial cells impairs neurogenesis in aged mice.

    Naoko Kuzumaki;Daigo Ikegami;Satoshi Imai;Michiko Narita

  • Chronic pain-induced emotional dysfunction is associated with astrogliosis due to cortical delta-opioid receptor dysfunction.

    Minoru Narita;Naoko Kuzumaki;Michiko Narita;Chihiro Kaneko

  • Change in MicroRNAs Associated with Neuronal Adaptive Responses in the Nucleus Accumbens under Neuropathic Pain

    S. Imai;M. Saeki;M. Yanase;H. Horiuchi

  • Astrocytic activation in the anterior cingulate cortex is critical for sleep disorder under neuropathic pain.

    Akira Yamashita;Asami Hamada;Yuki Suhara;Rui Kawabe

  • Analysis of sleep disorders under pain using an optogenetic tool: possible involvement of the activation of dorsal raphe nucleus-serotonergic neurons

    Hisakatsu Ito;Hisakatsu Ito;Makoto Yanase;Akira Yamashita;Chigusa Kitabatake

  • Sleep disturbances in a neuropathic pain-like condition in the mouse are associated with altered GABAergic transmission in the cingulate cortex.

    Minoru Narita;Keiichi Niikura;Keiichi Niikura;Kana Nanjo-Niikura;Kana Nanjo-Niikura;Michiko Narita

  • Identification of the G‐protein‐coupled ORL1 receptor in the mouse spinal cord by [35S]‐GTPγS binding and immunohistochemistry

    Minoru Narita;Hirokazu Mizoguchi;David E Oji;Michiko Narita

  • Involvement of Spinal Protein Kinase Cγ in the Attenuation of Opioid μ-Receptor-Mediated G-Protein Activation after Chronic Intrathecal Administration of [d-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-Ol5]Enkephalin

    Minoru Narita;Minoru Narita;Hirokazu Mizoguchi;Michiko Narita;Hiroshi Nagase;Hiroshi Nagase

  • Protease-Activated Receptor-1 and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor in Spinal Cord Neurons Are Implicated in Neuropathic Pain after Nerve Injury

    Minoru Narita;Aiko Usui;Michiko Narita;Keiichi Niikura

  • Implications of the NR2B subunit-containing NMDA receptor localized in mouse limbic forebrain in ethanol dependence.

    Minoru Narita;Miho Soma;Michiko Narita;Hirokazu Mizoguchi

  • Long-lasting change in brain dynamics induced by methamphetamine: enhancement of protein kinase C-dependent astrocytic response and behavioral sensitization.

    Minoru Narita;Mayumi Miyatake;Masahiro Shibasaki;Makoto Tsuda

Frequent Co-Authors

Minoru Narita
Minoru Narita Hoshi University
Tsutomu Suzuki
Tsutomu Suzuki University of Tokyo
Hideyuki Okano
Hideyuki Okano Keio University
Toshikazu Ushijima
Toshikazu Ushijima National Cancer Centre
Hiroshi Nagase
Hiroshi Nagase University of Tsukuba
Akihiro Yamanaka
Akihiro Yamanaka Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jun K. Yamashita
Jun K. Yamashita Kyoto University
Hirotaka James Okano
Hirotaka James Okano Jikei University School of Medicine
Nobutaka Hattori
Nobutaka Hattori Juntendo University
Ichiro Sora
Ichiro Sora Kobe University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens the door to various online study and career options—many of which can complement or broaden your expertise. For those interested in boosting their qualifications without pursuing a full degree, online certifications that pay well can add valuable, in-demand skills to your resume, including areas related to data analysis, health sciences, or counseling.

If you’re seeking a flexible academic path, reviewing the easiest online degree options can help you find programs that align with your learning style or schedule. Some of these degrees can serve as stepping stones toward neuroscience careers or related fields.

For students looking to combine neuroscience with social work, several cheapest cswe-accredited online msw programs offer rigorous training in mental health and support services at lower tuition rates. Alternatively, those interested in behavioral analysis should explore bcba accredited programs online to prepare for roles supporting those with behavioral challenges in clinical or education settings.

Best Scientists Citing Michiko Narita

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles