World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David L. Marvit

David L. Marvit

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
7117
World Ranking
11976
National Ranking
4891

David L. Marvit publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Marvit sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David L. Marvit D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Marvit sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Operating system
  • World Wide Web

David L. Marvit mainly investigates Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Motion detection, Mobile device and Gesture. As part of the same scientific family, David L. Marvit usually focuses on Artificial intelligence, concentrating on Track and intersecting with Controller. His Motion detection study is related to the wider topic of Motion.

His Gesture research incorporates themes from Wireless network interface controller and Relation. His Wireless network interface controller study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Computer hardware and Identification. His Relation study deals with User interface intersecting with Symbol and Character.

His most cited work include:

  • Automatically generate and displaying metadata as supplemental information concurrently with the web page, there being no link between web page and metadata (486 citations)
  • Gesture identification of controlled devices (313 citations)
  • Context dependent gesture response (263 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

David L. Marvit focuses on Artificial intelligence, Information retrieval, Computer vision, Set and Motion detection. His research in Artificial intelligence tackles topics such as Natural language processing which are related to areas like Word. His work carried out in the field of Information retrieval brings together such families of science as Linear search and Beam search.

His Computer vision research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Controller and Track. His study ties his expertise on Mobile device together with the subject of Motion detection. David L. Marvit interconnects User interface and Gesture in the investigation of issues within Mobile device.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (26.92%)
  • Information retrieval (23.08%)
  • Computer vision (21.15%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2016)?

  • World Wide Web (7.69%)
  • Salience (3.85%)
  • Artificial intelligence (26.92%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

David L. Marvit mainly focuses on World Wide Web, Salience, Artificial intelligence, Data signal and Set. His World Wide Web research integrates issues from Extensibility and Multimedia. The Salience study combines topics in areas such as User interface and Information retrieval.

His work deals with themes such as Computer vision and Natural language processing, which intersect with Artificial intelligence. His work on Image resolution and Eye tracking as part of his general Computer vision study is frequently connected to Temporal resolution and Viewing angle, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. Matching, Multi carrier and Embedded system is closely connected to Computer network in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Set.

Between 2011 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • Geotagging based on specified criteria (17 citations)
  • Stress model based on RR integral average (9 citations)
  • Monitoring adjustable workstations (8 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence
  • World Wide Web

World Wide Web, Salience, User interface, Information retrieval and Communication device are his primary areas of study. His World Wide Web study combines topics in areas such as Extensibility and Database. His research in Salience intersects with topics in Queueing theory, User modeling and Human–computer interaction.

His studies in Information retrieval integrate themes in fields like Object, Data stream and Data mining. His study on Communication device is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Multimedia.

Best Publications

  • Automatically generate and displaying metadata as supplemental information concurrently with the web page, there being no link between web page and metadata

    Michael G. Burner;Bruce C. Gilliat;Eric W. Jaquith;David L. Marvit

  • Motion control system and control method thereof

    Marvit David L;Reinhardt Albert H M;Thomas Adler B;Wilcox Bruce A

  • Context dependent gesture response

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Bruce Wilcox

  • Distinguishing tilt and translation motion components in handheld devices

    David L. Marvit;B. Thomas Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto;Bruce A. Wilcox

  • Gesture Based User Interface Supporting Preexisting Symbols

    David L. Marvit;Hitoshi Matsumoto;Albert H. M. Reinhardt

  • Selective engagement of motion detection

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt;B. Thomas Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Motion sensor engagement for a handheld device

    David Marvit;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • User definable gestures for motion controlled handheld devices

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Motion controlled remote controller

    David L. Marvit;B. Thomas Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Customizable gesture mappings for motion controlled handheld devices

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt;B. Thomas Adler;Bruce A. Wilcox

  • Non-uniform gesture precision

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt

  • Gesture based navigation of a handheld user interface

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Controlling and tracking access to disseminated information

    Maclen Marvit;Keith David Rosema;Jeffrey Ubois;David Marvit

  • Dynamic adaptation of gestures for motion controlled handheld devices

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt

  • Handheld device with preferred motion selection

    David Marvit;B. Adler;Albert Reinhardt;Bruce Wilcox

  • Feedback based user interface for motion controlled handheld devices

    David L. Marvit

  • Environmental modeling for motion controlled handheld devices

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Selective engagement of motion input modes

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt;B. Thomas Adler

  • Data collecting platform

    Jawahar Jain;ジャイン・ジャワハー;David Loren Marvit;ローレン マーヴィット・デイヴィド

  • Continuous monitoring of stress using data about environment

    Jawahar Jain;ジャイン・ジャワハー;David Loren Marvit;ローレン マーヴィット・デイヴィド

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science opens doors to many career options and interdisciplinary fields. Many students choose to expand their expertise by pursuing related online degrees, which allow for flexible learning and specialization in growing industries.

For those interested in law enforcement or digital forensics, a criminal justice degree online can be a great way to combine computer science skills with legal and investigative knowledge. Similarly, the world of finance is evolving rapidly with technology, making an accredited online accounting degree highly valuable for those interested in cybersecurity or financial software.

Many computer science graduates also pursue advanced training in analytics through data science programs, a sought-after area at the intersection of programming and statistical analysis.

Additionally, technology is transforming the building industry, and a construction management bachelor degree can lead to roles managing smart infrastructure and tech-driven construction projects.

Exploring these related online degrees can help students diversify their skills, stay competitive, and unlock new career pathways in evolving sectors.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Marvit