World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David L. Marvit

David L. Marvit

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 34 11976 11629 4891 4674 74 7117

David L. Marvit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David L. Marvit between 1997 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David L. Marvit published across 20 years, from 1997 to 2016, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2008. 5 of the 89 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2008. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 24 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications
1997 2016

89 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David L. Marvit: publications per year, 1997 to 2016
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 15
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 24
2009 6
2010 8
2011 8
2012 6
2013 5
2014 6
2015 3
2016 2
Total 89
Download as CSV

David L. Marvit publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Marvit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 72–81 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249 74
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

David L. Marvit D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Marvit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 34
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Operating system
  • World Wide Web

David L. Marvit mainly investigates Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Motion detection, Mobile device and Gesture. As part of the same scientific family, David L. Marvit usually focuses on Artificial intelligence, concentrating on Track and intersecting with Controller. His Motion detection study is related to the wider topic of Motion.

His Gesture research incorporates themes from Wireless network interface controller and Relation. His Wireless network interface controller study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Computer hardware and Identification. His Relation study deals with User interface intersecting with Symbol and Character.

His most cited work include:

  • Automatically generate and displaying metadata as supplemental information concurrently with the web page, there being no link between web page and metadata (486 citations)
  • Gesture identification of controlled devices (313 citations)
  • Context dependent gesture response (263 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

David L. Marvit focuses on Artificial intelligence, Information retrieval, Computer vision, Set and Motion detection. His research in Artificial intelligence tackles topics such as Natural language processing which are related to areas like Word. His work carried out in the field of Information retrieval brings together such families of science as Linear search and Beam search.

His Computer vision research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Controller and Track. His study ties his expertise on Mobile device together with the subject of Motion detection. David L. Marvit interconnects User interface and Gesture in the investigation of issues within Mobile device.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (26.92%)
  • Information retrieval (23.08%)
  • Computer vision (21.15%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2016)?

  • World Wide Web (7.69%)
  • Salience (3.85%)
  • Artificial intelligence (26.92%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

David L. Marvit mainly focuses on World Wide Web, Salience, Artificial intelligence, Data signal and Set. His World Wide Web research integrates issues from Extensibility and Multimedia. The Salience study combines topics in areas such as User interface and Information retrieval.

His work deals with themes such as Computer vision and Natural language processing, which intersect with Artificial intelligence. His work on Image resolution and Eye tracking as part of his general Computer vision study is frequently connected to Temporal resolution and Viewing angle, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. Matching, Multi carrier and Embedded system is closely connected to Computer network in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Set.

Between 2011 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • Geotagging based on specified criteria (17 citations)
  • Stress model based on RR integral average (9 citations)
  • Monitoring adjustable workstations (8 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence
  • World Wide Web

World Wide Web, Salience, User interface, Information retrieval and Communication device are his primary areas of study. His World Wide Web study combines topics in areas such as Extensibility and Database. His research in Salience intersects with topics in Queueing theory, User modeling and Human–computer interaction.

His studies in Information retrieval integrate themes in fields like Object, Data stream and Data mining. His study on Communication device is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Multimedia.

Best Publications

  • Automatically generate and displaying metadata as supplemental information concurrently with the web page, there being no link between web page and metadata

    Michael G. Burner;Bruce C. Gilliat;Eric W. Jaquith;David L. Marvit

  • Motion control system and control method thereof

    Marvit David L;Reinhardt Albert H M;Thomas Adler B;Wilcox Bruce A

  • Context dependent gesture response

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Bruce Wilcox

  • Distinguishing tilt and translation motion components in handheld devices

    David L. Marvit;B. Thomas Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto;Bruce A. Wilcox

  • Gesture Based User Interface Supporting Preexisting Symbols

    David L. Marvit;Hitoshi Matsumoto;Albert H. M. Reinhardt

  • Selective engagement of motion detection

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt;B. Thomas Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Motion sensor engagement for a handheld device

    David Marvit;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • User definable gestures for motion controlled handheld devices

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Motion controlled remote controller

    David L. Marvit;B. Thomas Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Customizable gesture mappings for motion controlled handheld devices

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt;B. Thomas Adler;Bruce A. Wilcox

  • Non-uniform gesture precision

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt

  • Gesture based navigation of a handheld user interface

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Controlling and tracking access to disseminated information

    Maclen Marvit;Keith David Rosema;Jeffrey Ubois;David Marvit

  • Dynamic adaptation of gestures for motion controlled handheld devices

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt

  • Handheld device with preferred motion selection

    David Marvit;B. Adler;Albert Reinhardt;Bruce Wilcox

  • Feedback based user interface for motion controlled handheld devices

    David L. Marvit

  • Environmental modeling for motion controlled handheld devices

    David Marvit;Albert Reinhardt;B. Adler;Hitoshi Matsumoto

  • Selective engagement of motion input modes

    David L. Marvit;Albert H. M. Reinhardt;B. Thomas Adler

  • Data collecting platform

    Jawahar Jain;ジャイン・ジャワハー;David Loren Marvit;ローレン マーヴィット・デイヴィド

  • Continuous monitoring of stress using data about environment

    Jawahar Jain;ジャイン・ジャワハー;David Loren Marvit;ローレン マーヴィット・デイヴィド

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science opens doors to many career options and interdisciplinary fields. Many students choose to expand their expertise by pursuing related online degrees, which allow for flexible learning and specialization in growing industries.

For those interested in law enforcement or digital forensics, a criminal justice degree online can be a great way to combine computer science skills with legal and investigative knowledge. Similarly, the world of finance is evolving rapidly with technology, making an accredited online accounting degree highly valuable for those interested in cybersecurity or financial software.

Many computer science graduates also pursue advanced training in analytics through data science programs, a sought-after area at the intersection of programming and statistical analysis.

Additionally, technology is transforming the building industry, and a construction management bachelor degree can lead to roles managing smart infrastructure and tech-driven construction projects.

Exploring these related online degrees can help students diversify their skills, stay competitive, and unlock new career pathways in evolving sectors.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Marvit

Recently Published Articles