World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 83 826 788 356 331 260 32626

David J. Nowak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David J. Nowak between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David J. Nowak published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2010. 4 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2010. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 2 publications
1989 2026

278 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David J. Nowak: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 4
1991 2
1992 2
1993 5
1994 5
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 5
1999 0
2000 8
2001 7
2002 8
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 11
2007 7
2008 8
2009 6
2010 17
2011 8
2012 17
2013 10
2014 15
2015 11
2016 14
2017 11
2018 12
2019 14
2020 15
2021 11
2022 16
2023 3
2024 6
2025 2
2026 2
Total 278
Download as CSV

David J. Nowak publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Nowak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 260 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180 260
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

David J. Nowak D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Nowak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42 83
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

David J. Nowak is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a substantial number of publications in this field. The scientist has contributed specifically to several subfields, including global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, environmental engineering, plant science, and nature and landscape conservation.

The scientist's work covers topics such as urban green space and health, land use and ecosystem services, urban heat island mitigation, fire effects on ecosystems, urban stormwater management solutions, plant responses to elevated CO2, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Notable recent papers authored by David J. Nowak include:

  • The increase of impervious cover and decrease of tree cover within urban areas globally (2012-2017), 2020, Urban forestry & urban greening
  • The disparity in tree cover and ecosystem service values among redlining classes in the United States, 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning

They have frequently collaborated with coauthors including Eric J. Greenfield, Theodore A. Endreny, Robert C. Coville, Alexis Ellis, and Satoshi Hirabayashi.

Their research has been published in several venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals and archives:

  • Urban forestry & urban greening
  • Forest Service Research Data Archive
  • Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Journal of Forestry

Best Publications

  • Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States

    David J. Nowak;Daniel E. Crane;Jack C. Stevens

  • CARBON STORAGE AND SEQUESTRATION BY URBAN TREES IN THE USA

    David J. Nowak;Daniel E. Crane

  • Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States

    David J. Nowak;Satoshi Hirabayashi;Allison Bodine;Eric Greenfield

  • Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States

    David J. Nowak;Eric J. Greenfield;Robert E. Hoehn;Elizabeth Lapoint

  • Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas

    Thomas Elmqvist;Heikki Martti Setälä;SN Handel;S van der Ploeg

  • Understanding the Benefits and Costs of Urban Forest Ecosystems

    David J. Nowak;John F. Dwyer

  • Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project

    E. Gregory McPherson;David Nowak;Gordon Heisler;Sue Grimmond

  • Modeled PM2.5 removal by trees in ten U.S. cities and associated health effects.

    David J. Nowak;Satoshi Hirabayashi;Allison Bodine;Robert Hoehn

  • A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services

    David J. Nowak;Daniel E. Crane;Jack C. Stevens;Robert E. Hoehn

  • Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest

    Francisco J. Escobedo;David J. Nowak

  • Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle

    D. E. Pataki;R. J. Alig;A. S. Fung;N. E. Golubiewski

  • Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project

    Gregory E. McPherson;David J. Nowak;Rowan A. Rowntree

  • Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States

    Richard V. Pouyat;Ian D. Yesilonis;David J. Nowak

  • Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France

    Wissal Selmi;Christiane Weber;Emmanuel Rivière;Nadège Blond

  • Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover

    David J. Nowak;Rowan A. Rowntree;E.Gregory McPherson;Susan M. Sisinni

  • Contribution of Ecosystem Services to Air Quality and Climate Change Mitigation Policies: The Case of Urban Forests in Barcelona, Spain

    Francesc Baró;Lydia Chaparro;Erik Gómez-Baggethun;Johannes Langemeyer

  • Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health

    David J. Nowak;Satoshi Hirabayashi;Marlene Doyle;Mark McGovern

  • Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality

    Francisco J. Escobedo;John E. Wagner;David J. Nowak;Carmen Luz De la Maza

  • The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions

    David J. Nowak;Daniel E. Crane

  • Air pollution removal by Chicago's urban forest

    D.J. Nowak

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen R. Shifley
Stephen R. Shifley United States Department of Agriculture
Susan I. Stewart
Susan I. Stewart University of Wisconsin–Madison
John W. Coulston
John W. Coulston US Forest Service
Richard V. Pouyat
Richard V. Pouyat US Forest Service
Grant M. Domke
Grant M. Domke US Forest Service
David N. Wear
David N. Wear Resources For The Future
Francisco J. Escobedo
Francisco J. Escobedo US Forest Service
Carlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra National Research Council (CNR)
Rüdiger Grote
Rüdiger Grote Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Erik Gómez-Baggethun
Erik Gómez-Baggethun Norwegian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several related online degree options can enhance career prospects. Public service and administration roles, for example, often require skills gained from programs like the best online masters in public administration, which offer flexible, accelerated learning tailored for working professionals.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial in environmental work, making an online sociology degree bachelors a valuable complement. This degree provides insight into human behavior and community structures, aiding in policy making and sustainable development initiatives.

For those aiming at leadership or academic roles, advancing through online doctoral options can be highly beneficial. Programs such as online doctoral programs without dissertation offer alternative paths to earning a doctorate, removing common barriers while maintaining academic rigor.

Additionally, students should consider accredited options like the accredited eds to edd programs, which provide structured pathways from education specialist degrees to doctorates, supporting career advancement in educational and organizational leadership roles linked to environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Nowak

Trending Scientists