World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5057 4690 356 342 126 6992

Mark Colyvan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Colyvan between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Colyvan published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2001. 2 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2001. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1997 2025

132 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Colyvan: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 4
1999 10
2000 5
2001 15
2002 4
2003 11
2004 4
2005 4
2006 4
2007 3
2008 8
2009 6
2010 9
2011 7
2012 12
2013 2
2014 4
2015 0
2016 4
2017 3
2018 2
2019 2
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 1
Total 132
Download as CSV

Mark Colyvan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Colyvan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 126
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Colyvan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Colyvan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Colyvan is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and conducts research spanning multiple areas within arts, humanities, and social sciences.

The primary fields of study for their work include:

  • Arts and Humanities
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, the subfields of study frequently addressed are:

  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Law
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

The main research topics covered in their publications are:

  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Jury Decision Making Processes
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Law in Society and Culture

Mark Colyvan has contributed multiple papers across various academic journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "The Prospects for a Monist Theory of Non-causal Explanation in Science and Mathematics", 2020, Erkenntnis
  • "Explanation impossible", 2020, Philosophical Studies
  • "Meta-uncertainty and the proof paradoxes", 2023, Philosophical Studies
  • "Do conspiracy-theory interventions rest on a mistake?", 2025, Synthese

The venues of publication where Colyvan has appeared most frequently are:

  • Philosophical Studies
  • Erkenntnis
  • Synthese

Collaborations with other researchers are part of their scholarly activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Alexander Reutlinger
  • Karolina Krzyżanowska
  • Katie Steele
  • Sam Baron
  • Michael D. Resnik

Best Publications

  • A TAXONOMY AND TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY FOR ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY

    Helen M. Regan;Mark Colyvan;Mark A. Burgman

  • The Indispensability of Mathematics

    Mark Colyvan

  • Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value

    James Justus;James Justus;Mark Colyvan;Helen Regan;Lynn A. Maguire

  • The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank

    Sarah A. Bekessy;Brendan A. Wintle;David B. Lindenmayer;Michael A. Mccarthy

  • Ecological Orbits : How Planets Move and Populations Grow

    Lev R. Ginzburg;Mark Colyvan

  • An Inferential Conception of the Application of Mathematics

    Otávio Bueno;Mark Colyvan

  • Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy‐makers in natural resource management

    Philip G Gibbons;Charlie A Zammit;Kara Nicole Youngentob;Hugh P Possingham

  • A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management

    Helen M. Regan;Mark Colyvan;Lisa Markovchick-Nicholls

  • The Explanatory Power of Phase Spaces

    Aidan Lyon;Mark Colyvan

  • Avoiding bio-perversity from carbon sequestration solutions

    David Lindenmayer;David Lindenmayer;Kristin B Hulvey;Richard Hobbs;Richard Hobbs;Mark Colyvan

  • There is No Easy Road to Nominalism

    Mark Colyvan

  • An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mathematics

    Mark Colyvan

  • Laws of nature and laws of ecology

    M. Colyvan;L. R. Ginzburg

  • Mathematics and aesthetic considerations in science

    Mark Colyvan

  • Is it a Crime to Belong to a Reference Class

    Mark Colyvan;Helen M. Regan;Scott Ferson

  • How Mathematics Can Make a Difference

    Samuel Thomas Baron;Samuel Thomas Baron;Samuel Thomas Baron;Mark Colyvan;Mark Colyvan;Mark Colyvan;David Ripley;David Ripley;David Ripley

  • The Miracle of Applied Mathematics

    Mark Colyvan

  • Indispensability arguments in the philosophy of mathematics

    Mark Colyvan

  • Probability and Ecological Complexity

    Mark Colyvan

  • Can the eleatic principle be justified

    Mark Colyvan

  • Mathematics and Its Applications

    Unknown

  • The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment.Second Edition.ByMark Sagoff. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. $80.00 (hardcover); $27.99 (paper). xi + 266 p.; index. 978‐0‐521‐86755‐9 (hc); 978‐0‐521‐68713‐3 (pb). 2008.

    Mark Colyvan

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen M. Regan
Helen M. Regan University of California, Riverside
Mark A. Burgman
Mark A. Burgman Imperial College London
David B. Lindenmayer
David B. Lindenmayer Australian National University
Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Otávio Bueno
Otávio Bueno University of Miami
Michael A. McCarthy
Michael A. McCarthy University of Melbourne
Brendan A. Wintle
Brendan A. Wintle University of Melbourne
Sarah A. Bekessy
Sarah A. Bekessy RMIT University
Richard J. Hobbs
Richard J. Hobbs University of Western Australia
Jc Beall
Jc Beall University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities can explore a variety of online degrees that offer both flexibility and strong career outcomes. Earning a degree online is increasingly popular, particularly for those who need to balance work, family, or other commitments.

If you're considering a career in social work, 1 year msw programs online allow you to fast-track your graduate education, enabling a quicker entry into advanced social work roles. For those passionate about mental health, counseling, or research, a fastest online psychology degree can be a practical option, helping you complete your studies in less time.

Accreditation is key for careers in counseling and therapy. Choosing cacrep-accredited programs online ensures your credentials are recognized and respected. If your interest lies in family and relationship dynamics, you might consider an online masters in marriage and family therapy, which prepares you for impactful roles as a licensed therapist.

These pathways demonstrate that online education in the social sciences is not only accessible and diverse but can also lead to professional licensing and a wide range of fulfilling careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Colyvan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles