World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
5615
World Ranking
5650
National Ranking
1925

Grant M. Domke publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant M. Domke sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 233 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Grant M. Domke D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant M. Domke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Grant M. Domke is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Environmental Science, contributing to 173 publications. Their work spans several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Ecology, and Insect Science. This multidisciplinary approach reflects a focus on forest ecosystems, environmental processes, and their interactions.

Research topics associated with Domke's work include:

  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management

They have published regularly in a variety of venues. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Forest Service Research Data Archive
  • Carbon Balance and Management

Among recent papers associated with Grant M. Domke, the following stand out:

  • "Tree planting has the potential to increase carbon sequestration capacity of forests in the United States," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century," 2021, Science Advances
  • "rFIA: An R package for estimation of forest attributes with the US Forest Inventory and Analysis database," 2020, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • "Structural diversity as a reliable and novel predictor for ecosystem productivity," 2023, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
  • "Carbon fractions in the world's dead wood," 2021, Nature Communications

Grant M. Domke also has a book publication titled "Aboveground Woody Biomass Product Validation Good Practices Protocol," released in 2021 through Ghent University.

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as:

  • Brian F. Walters
  • Songlin Fei
  • Andrew O. Finley
  • Elizabeth A. LaRue
  • Christopher W. Woodall

Best Publications

  • Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century

    Liang Xu;Sassan S. Saatchi;Sassan S. Saatchi;Yan Yang;Yifan Yu

  • Tree planting has the potential to increase carbon sequestration capacity of forests in the United States.

    Grant M. Domke;Sonja N. Oswalt;Brian F. Walters;Randall S. Morin

  • Shifts in dominant tree mycorrhizal associations in response to anthropogenic impacts

    Insu Jo;Songlin Fei;Christopher M. Oswalt;Grant M. Domke

  • Methods and equations for estimating aboveground volume, biomass, and carbon for trees in the U.S. forest inventory, 2010

    Christopher W. Woodall;Linda S. Heath;Grant M. Domke;Michael C. Nichols

  • Generic methodologies applicable to multiple land-use categories

    Stephen Michael Ogle;Werner Alexander Kurz;Carly Green;Andrea Brandon

  • Residence Times and Decay Rates of Downed Woody Debris Biomass/Carbon in Eastern US Forests

    Matthew B. Russell;Christopher W. Woodall;Shawn Fraver;Anthony W. D’Amato

  • Reforestation can sequester two petagrams of carbon in US topsoils in a century

    Lucas E. Nave;Grant M. Domke;Kathryn L. Hofmeister;Kathryn L. Hofmeister;Umakant Mishra

  • Applications of the United States Forest Inventory and Analysis dataset: A review and future directions

    Wade Travis Tinkham;Patrick Ryan Mahoney;Andrew T. Hudak;Grant M. Domke

  • Structural diversity as a reliable and novel predictor for ecosystem productivity

    Unknown

  • Interactions between white-tailed deer density and the composition of forest understories in the northern United States

    Matthew B. Russell;Christopher W. Woodall;Kevin M. Potter;Brian F. Walters

  • Consequences of alternative tree-level biomass estimation procedures on U.S. forest carbon stock estimates

    Grant M. Domke;Christopher W. Woodall;James E. Smith;James A. Westfall

  • Carbon fractions in the world's dead wood.

    Adam R. Martin;Grant M. Domke;Mahendra Doraisami;Sean C. Thomas

  • rFIA: An R package for estimation of forest attributes with the US Forest Inventory and Analysis database

    Hunter Stanke;Andrew O. Finley;Aaron S. Weed;Brian F. Walters

  • Over half of western United States' most abundant tree species in decline

    Hunter Stanke;Andrew O. Finley;Grant M. Domke;Aaron S. Weed

  • Biomass and carbon attributes of downed woody materials in forests of the United States

    C.W. Woodall;B.F. Walters;S.N. Oswalt;G.M. Domke

  • Improved forest management as a natural climate solution: A review

    Lilli Kaarakka;Lilli Kaarakka;Meredith Cornett;Grant Domke;Todd Ontl

  • Estimating litter carbon stocks on forest land in the United States.

    Grant M. Domke;Charles H. Perry;Brian F. Walters;Christopher W. Woodall

  • Delineating managed land for reporting national greenhouse gas emissions and removals to the United Nations framework convention on climate change

    Stephen M. Ogle;Grant Domke;Werner A. Kurz;Marcelo T. Rocha

  • Hybrid estimators for mean aboveground carbon per unit area

    Ronald E. McRoberts;Qi Chen;Grant M. Domke;Göran Ståhl

  • Attribution of net carbon change by disturbance type across forest lands of the conterminous United States

    N. L. Harris;S. C. Hagen;S. S. Saatchi;T. R. H. Pearson

  • Accounting for density reduction and structural loss in standing dead trees: Implications for forest biomass and carbon stock estimates in the United States.

    Grant M. Domke;Christopher W Woodall;James E H Smith

  • Toward inventory-based estimates of soil organic carbon in forests of the United States

    G. M. Domke;C. H. Perry;B. F. Walters;L. E. Nave

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher W. Woodall
Christopher W. Woodall US Forest Service
Anthony W. D'Amato
Anthony W. D'Amato University of Vermont
John W. Coulston
John W. Coulston US Forest Service
Christopher W. Swanston
Christopher W. Swanston US Forest Service
Ronald E. McRoberts
Ronald E. McRoberts University of Minnesota
Gregg Marland
Gregg Marland Appalachian State University
Shawn Fraver
Shawn Fraver University of Maine
David J. Nowak
David J. Nowak US Forest Service
Sassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi California Institute of Technology
Warren B. Cohen
Warren B. Cohen Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a range of related career pathways in applied psychology and mental health. Many students interested in ecological studies also care about the connections between human behavior, wellbeing, and the environment.

For those interested in a swift academic journey, an accelerated master's in psychology provides an excellent option, letting you earn your degree faster while expanding your expertise. If you’re drawn to helping individuals and communities, an online masters mental health counseling degree can build the skills needed for a fulfilling career in mental health services.

Careers that intersect with law and behavioral science are also growing. Earning a forensic psychology degree is a pathway for those interested in working within legal or correctional settings, providing expertise on human behavior in complex contexts. Additionally, if your passion lies in supporting younger populations, consider an online child psychology degree to focus on issues unique to children and adolescents.

These diverse, flexible online degrees complement studies in Ecology and Evolution, broadening both your knowledge and professional opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Grant M. Domke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles