World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8476 7834 3608 3267 80 7877

Dara L. Dickstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dara L. Dickstein between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dara L. Dickstein published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2010. 6 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2010. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
2001 2025

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dara L. Dickstein: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 0
2006 3
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 12
2011 3
2012 4
2013 6
2014 4
2015 4
2016 5
2017 6
2018 1
2019 5
2020 2
2021 2
2022 3
2023 4
2024 4
2025 2
Total 86
Download as CSV

Dara L. Dickstein publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dara L. Dickstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 80
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Dara L. Dickstein D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dara L. Dickstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Dara L. Dickstein is affiliated with the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, and Genetics.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of main topics such as:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Dickstein has published in several research venues, including:

  • Research Square (4 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (3 publications)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Molecular Autism
  • Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Dickstein include:

  • Brain and blood biomarkers of tauopathy and neuronal injury in humans and rats with neurobehavioral syndromes following blast exposure, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Altered synaptic ultrastructure in the prefrontal cortex of Shank3-deficient rats, 2020, Molecular Autism
  • Galactic cosmic radiation exposure causes multifaceted neurocognitive impairments, 2023, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
  • Chronic Low Dose Neutron Exposure Results in Altered Neurotransmission Properties of the Hippocampus-Prefrontal Cortex Axis in Both Mice and Rats, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Laterality and region-specific tau phosphorylation correlate with PTSD-related behavioral traits in rats exposed to repetitive low-level blast, 2021, Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Frequent collaborators in their research include Merina Varghese, Patrick R. Hof, Allison Sowa, Sam Gandy, and Tahia Warda.

Best Publications

  • Haploinsufficiency of the autism-associated Shank3 gene leads to deficits in synaptic function, social interaction, and social communication.

    Ozlem Bozdagi;Takeshi Sakurai;Danae Papapetrou;Xiaobin Wang

  • Automated Three-Dimensional Detection and Shape Classification of Dendritic Spines from Fluorescence Microscopy Images

    Alfredo Rodriguez;Douglas B. Ehlenberger;Dara L. Dickstein;Patrick R. Hof

  • Autism spectrum disorder: neuropathology and animal models

    Merina Varghese;Neha Keshav;Sarah Jacot-Descombes;Tahia Warda

  • Changes in the structural complexity of the aged brain

    Dara L. Dickstein;Doron Kabaso;Anne B. Rocher;Jennifer I. Luebke

  • Blood-brain barrier permeability precedes senile plaque formation in an Alzheimer disease model.

    Maki Ujiie;Dara L. Dickstein;Douglas A. Carlow;Wilfred A. Jefferies

  • Novel pentameric thiophene derivatives for in vitro and in vivo optical imaging of a plethora of protein aggregates in cerebral amyloidoses

    Andreas Åslund;Christina J. Sigurdson;Therése Klingstedt;Stefan Grathwohl

  • Moderate consumption of Cabernet Sauvignon attenuates Abeta neuropathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Jun Wang;Lap Ho;Zhong Zhao;Ilana Seror

  • Amyloid triggers extensive cerebral angiogenesis causing blood brain barrier permeability and hypervascularity in Alzheimer's disease.

    Kaan E. Biron;Dara L. Dickstein;Rayshad Gopaul;Wilfred A. Jefferies

  • Dendritic spine changes associated with normal aging.

    Dara L. Dickstein;Christina M. Weaver;Jennifer I. Luebke;Jennifer I. Luebke;Patrick R. Hof

  • Role of Vascular Risk Factors and Vascular Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease

    Dara L. Dickstein;Jessica Walsh;Hannah Brautigam;Steven D. Stockton

  • Amyloid precursor protein (APP) regulates synaptic structure and function.

    Sheue-Houy Tyan;Ann Yu-Jung Shih;Jessica J. Walsh;Hiroko Maruyama

  • Tauopathy PET and amyloid PET in the diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathies: studies of a retired NFL player and of a man with FTD and a severe head injury

    E M Mitsis;S Riggio;L Kostakoglu;D L Dickstein

  • Aβ peptide immunization restores blood-brain barrier integrity in Alzheimer disease

    Dara L. Dickstein;Kaan E. Biron;Maki Ujiie;Cheryl G. Pfeifer

  • Heterogeneity in Red Wine Polyphenolic Contents Differentially Influences Alzheimer's Disease-type Neuropathology and Cognitive Deterioration

    Lap Ho;Lap Ho;Ling Hong Chen;Jun Wang;Wei Zhao

  • Hippocampal interneuron loss in an APP/PS1 double mutant mouse and in Alzheimer’s disease

    Hisaaki Takahashi;Hisaaki Takahashi;Ivona Brasnjevic;Ivona Brasnjevic;Bart P. F. Rutten;Bart P. F. Rutten;Nicolien Van Der Kolk;Nicolien Van Der Kolk

  • Dendritic vulnerability in neurodegenerative disease: insights from analyses of cortical pyramidal neurons in transgenic mouse models.

    Jennifer I. Luebke;Christina M. Weaver;Christina M. Weaver;Anne B. Rocher;Alfredo Rodriguez

  • Adolescent exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol alters the transcriptional trajectory and dendritic architecture of prefrontal pyramidal neurons.

    Michael L. Miller;Benjamin Chadwick;Dara L. Dickstein;Immanuel Purushothaman

  • Selective vulnerability of the cerebral vasculature to blast injury in a rat model of mild traumatic brain injury

    Miguel A Gama Sosa;Miguel A Gama Sosa;Rita De Gasperi;Rita De Gasperi;Pierce L Janssen;Frank J Yuk

  • Vascular and Inflammatory Factors in the Pathophysiology of Blast-Induced Brain Injury

    Gregory A. Elder;Miguel A. Gama Sosa;Miguel A. Gama Sosa;Rita De Gasperi;Rita De Gasperi;James Radford Stone

  • Blast overpressure induces shear-related injuries in the brain of rats exposed to a mild traumatic brain injury.

    Miguel A. Gama Sosa;Miguel A. Gama Sosa;Rita De Gasperi;Rita De Gasperi;Alejandro J. Paulino;Alejandro J. Paulino;Paul E. Pricop;Paul E. Pricop

  • Changes in dendritic complexity and spine morphology in transgenic mice expressing human wild-type tau

    Dara L. Dickstein;Hannah Brautigam;Steven D. Stockton;James Schmeidler

  • Dietary composition modulates brain mass and solubilizable Aβ levels in a mouse model of aggressive Alzheimer's amyloid pathology

    Steve Pedrini;Carlos Thomas;Carlos Thomas;Hannah Brautigam;Hannah Brautigam;James Schmeidler

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick R. Hof
Patrick R. Hof Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Sam Gandy
Sam Gandy Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gregory A. Elder
Gregory A. Elder Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Wilfred A. Jefferies
Wilfred A. Jefferies University of British Columbia
William G.M. Janssen
William G.M. Janssen Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joseph D. Buxbaum
Joseph D. Buxbaum Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mary Sano
Mary Sano Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Giulio Maria Pasinetti
Giulio Maria Pasinetti Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jennifer I. Luebke
Jennifer I. Luebke Boston University
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience, it’s worth exploring online education options that offer flexibility and affordability. An online bachelor's degree can help you get started on your journey faster, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments. Many reputable programs allow you to complete coursework at your own pace while still gaining a solid academic foundation in neuroscience or related fields.

As you evaluate your educational path, it’s important to consider earning potential after graduation. Neuroscience degrees can lead to careers in research, healthcare, and technology—areas that are often listed among the highest paying majors and the most profitable degrees. Specializations in areas like biostatistics, psychological science, or biomedical engineering can significantly increase your job prospects and salary outlook.

Affordability is also a key issue for many students. Choosing an online school that accepts fafsa can provide access to financial aid, reducing overall costs and making advanced study more accessible. Whether you’re interested in clinical work, research, or biotech, multiple online degree pathways can set you on a successful neuroscience career path.

Best Scientists Citing Dara L. Dickstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles