World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel J. Sargent

Daniel J. Sargent

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
128
Citations
115476
World Ranking
2635
National Ranking
1476

Daniel J. Sargent publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 700 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel J. Sargent D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Sargent sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel J. Sargent was affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and was involved in medical research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their research concentrated largely on Oncology, with a specific emphasis on colorectal cancer treatments and studies. Over their career, they also contributed to related subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, and Surgery.

Their work frequently addressed topics including colorectal cancer treatments and studies, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, cancer treatment and pharmacology, gastric cancer management and outcomes, lung cancer treatments and mutations, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, and colorectal cancer screening and detection.

Key publications by Daniel J. Sargent included the following:

  • "A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Combinations in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer" (2023) published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "High-Density Linkage Map Construction and QTL Identification in a Diploid Blueberry Mapping Population" (2021) published in Frontiers in Plant Science
  • "Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology" (2020) published by UNC Libraries
  • "Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Colon Cancer With Microsatellite Instability of Sporadic or Familial Origin Treated With Adjuvant FOLFOX With or Without Cetuximab: A Pooled Analysis of the PETACC8 and N0147 Trials" (2020) published in JCO Precision Oncology
  • "Developmental processes in the Rosaceae through the lens of DNA and RNA methylation" (2025) published in Planta

The scientist frequently published in venues such as UNC Libraries, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Frontiers in Plant Science, JCO Precision Oncology, and Planta.

Throughout their career, Daniel J. Sargent collaborated with several researchers, notably Richard M. Goldberg, Henry C. Pitot, Axel Grothey, Charles S. Fuchs, and Steven R. Alberts. Richard M. Goldberg was the most frequent coauthor, appearing in numerous joint publications.

Best Publications

  • New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)

    Elizabeth Eisenhauer;Patrick Therasse;Jan Bogaerts;L.H. Schwartz

  • A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

    Heidi Nelson;Daniel J Sargent;H Sam Wieand

  • Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Axel Grothey;Eric Van Cutsem;Alberto Sobrero;Salvatore Siena

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Combinations in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Richard M. Goldberg;Daniel J. Sargent;Roscoe F. Morton;Charles S. Fuchs

  • Tumor Microsatellite-Instability Status as a Predictor of Benefit from Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer

    Christine M. Ribic;Daniel J. Sargent;Malcolm J. Moore;Malcolm J. Moore;Stephen N. Thibodeau

  • International validation of the consensus Immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study

    Franck Pagès;Bernhard Mlecnik;Florence Marliot;Gabriela Bindea;Gabriela Bindea;Gabriela Bindea

  • Guidelines 2000 for Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery

    Heidi Nelson;Nicholas Petrelli;Arthur Carlin;Jean Couture

  • Defective Mismatch Repair As a Predictive Marker for Lack of Efficacy of Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancer

    Daniel J. Sargent;Silvia Marsoni;Genevieve Monges;Stephen N. Thibodeau

  • Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

    Carolyn C. Compton;L. Peter Fielding;Lawrence J. Burgart;Barbara Conley

  • Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Hepatic Resection and Improved Chemotherapy

    Scott Kopetz;George J. Chang;Michael J. Overman;Cathy Eng

  • Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer

    Carolyn C. Compton;Carolyn C. Compton;L. Peter Fielding;Lawrence J. Burgart;Barbara Conley

  • Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

    James Fleshman;Daniel J. Sargent;Erin Green;Mehran Anvari

  • The genome of woodland strawberry ( Fragaria vesca )

    Vladimir Shulaev;Daniel J. Sargent;Ross N. Crowhurst;Todd C. Mockler

  • Survival of Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Improves With the Availability of Fluorouracil-Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin in the Course of Treatment

    Axel Grothey;Daniel Sargent;Richard M. Goldberg;Hans Joachim Schmoll

  • Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much?

    Sharlene Gill;Charles L. Loprinzi;Daniel J. Sargent;Stephan D. Thomé

  • Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial

    James Fleshman;Megan Branda;Daniel J. Sargent;Anne Marie Boller

  • A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients.

    Daniel J. Sargent;Richard M. Goldberg;Stacy D. Jacobson;John S. Macdonald

  • Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Randomized Trial

    Jane C. Weeks;Heidi Nelson;Shari Gelber;Daniel Sargent

  • Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer A Meta-analysis

    Gastric (Global Advanced);Xavier Paoletti;Koji Oba

  • Immunohistochemistry Versus Microsatellite Instability Testing in Phenotyping Colorectal Tumors

    Noralane M. Lindor;Lawrence J. Burgart;Olga Leontovich;Richard M. Goldberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Goldberg
Richard M. Goldberg West Virginia University
Axel Grothey
Axel Grothey University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Aimery de Gramont
Aimery de Gramont Grenoble Alpes University
Marc Buyse
Marc Buyse Hasselt University
Roberto Labianca
Roberto Labianca Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure if becoming a physician is your only option? There are many related online degrees and career pathways that can lead to rewarding roles in the medical field.

For those seeking in-demand administrative roles, consider a low cost medical coding and billing online program. These programs typically require less time and investment than full medical degrees, yet offer strong employment prospects.

If hands-on patient care interests you, becoming a nurse is a popular, flexible route. Explore how much does online nursing school cost to find programs that fit your budget, or look at the cheapest online np programs to advance your nursing credentials and increase your scope of practice.

For those aiming for leadership or research roles, a phd in nursing can help you reach academic, executive, or advanced clinical positions.

These online programs offer flexibility and often lower tuition costs, making healthcare careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Sargent

Recently Published Articles