World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 68 1508 118 132 17672

Clive Dickson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Clive Dickson between 1973 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Clive Dickson published across 38 years, from 1973 to 2010, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1995. 2 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2010. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1995. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication
1973 2010

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Clive Dickson: publications per year, 1973 to 2010
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 2
1975 1
1976 2
1977 1
1978 1
1979 3
1980 2
1981 2
1982 3
1983 4
1984 4
1985 0
1986 5
1987 4
1988 2
1989 6
1990 7
1991 6
1992 3
1993 7
1994 6
1995 10
1996 3
1997 5
1998 1
1999 4
2000 9
2001 7
2002 8
2003 3
2004 5
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
Total 138
Download as CSV

Clive Dickson publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive Dickson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 132 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 132
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Clive Dickson D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive Dickson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97 68
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Clive Dickson is affiliated with the Cancer Research UK London Research Institute in the United Kingdom. Their work is positioned within the broader context of cancer research.

Although specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, main fields of study, subfields, and topics of work are not listed, the affiliation with a prominent cancer research institute indicates involvement in biomedical research, likely focusing on aspects of oncology or related life sciences.

This professional connection suggests engagement in collaborative scientific efforts that contribute to understanding cancer mechanisms or developing treatments, typical of researchers at such institutions.

There is no record of awards or book publications attributed to Clive Dickson in the provided data.

Given the available information, analyses of publication trends, research contributions, or specific scientific impacts remain unaddressed.

Best Publications

  • An important role for the IIIb isoform of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in mesenchymal-epithelial signalling during mouse organogenesis

    L De Moerlooze;B Spencer-Dene;J M Revest;M Hajihosseini

  • Amplification and Overexpression of Cyclin D1 in Breast Cancer Detected by Immunohistochemical Staining

    Cheryl Gillett;Vera Fantl;Rosalind Smith;Charlotte Fisher

  • Fibroblast growth factor signaling in tumorigenesis

    Richard Grose;Clive Dickson

  • D11S287, a putative oncogene on chromosome 11q13, is amplified and expressed in squamous cell and mammary carcinomas and linked to BCL-1.

    Lammie Ga;Fantl;Smith R;Schuuring E

  • Tumorigenesis by mouse mammary tumor virus: Proviral activation of a cellular gene in the common integration region int-2

    C. Dickson;R. Smith;S. Brookes;G. Peters

  • Potential oncogene product related to growth factors.

    Clive Dickson;Gordon Peters

  • Tumorigenesis by mouse mammary tumor virus: Evidence for a common region for provirus integration in mammary tumors

    Gordon Peters;Sharon Brookes;Rosalind Smith;Clive Dickson

  • Disruption of Fgf10/Fgfr2b-coordinated epithelial-mesenchymal interactions causes cleft palate

    Ritva Rice;Bradley Spencer-Dene;Elaine C. Connor;Amel Gritli-Linde

  • Subcellular Fate of the int-2 Oncoprotein Is Determined by Choice of Initiation Codon

    Piers Acland;Mark Dixon;Gordon Peters;Clive Dickson

  • CDK6 (PLSTIRE) and CDK4 (PSK-J3) are a distinct subset of the cyclin-dependent kinases that associate with cyclin D1.

    Bates S;Bonetta L;MacAllan D;Parry D

  • Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2-IIIb acts upstream of Shh and Fgf4 and is required for limb bud maintenance but not for the induction of Fgf8, Fgf10, Msx1, or Bmp4.

    Jean-Michel Revest;Bradley Spencer-Dene;Karen Kerr;Laurence De Moerlooze

  • A role for FGF-8 in the initiation and maintenance of vertebrate limb bud outgrowth

    Radma Mahmood;Janine Bresnick;Amata Hornbruch;Catherine Mahony

  • FGF-7 (keratinocyte growth factor) expression during mouse development suggests roles in myogenesis, forebrain regionalisation and epithelial-mesenchymal interactions

    Ivor J. Mason;Frances Fuller-Pace;Rosalind Smith;Clive Dickson

  • Development of the Thymus Requires Signaling Through the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor R2-IIIb

    Jean-Michel Revest;Ravinder K. Suniara;Karen Kerr;John J. T. Owen

  • Complete nucleotide sequence of a milk-transmitted mouse mammary tumor virus: two frameshift suppression events are required for translation of gag and pol.

    R Moore;M Dixon;R Smith;G Peters

  • Role of FGF10/FGFR2b signaling during mammary gland development in the mouse embryo

    Arnaud André Mailleux;Bradley Spencer-Dene;Christian Dillon;Delphine Ndiaye

  • Sequence, topography and protein coding potential of mouse int-2: a putative oncogene activated by mouse mammary tumour virus.

    R Moore;G Casey;S Brookes;M Dixon

  • Absence of cyclin D/cdk complexes in cells lacking functional retinoblastoma protein.

    Bates S;Parry D;Bonetta L;Vousden K

  • Fgf3 and Fgf8 are required together for formation of the otic placode and vesicle.

    Habib Maroon;Jennifer Walshe;Radma Mahmood;Radma Mahmood;Paul Kiefer

  • An Important Role for the IIIb Isoform of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Mesenchymal-Epithelial Signalling during Mouse Organogenesis

    B Spencer-Dene;L De Moerlooze;C Dickson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon Peters
Gordon Peters Cancer Research UK London Research Institute
Bradley Spencer-Dene
Bradley Spencer-Dene The Francis Crick Institute
Sabine Werner
Sabine Werner ETH Zurich
Robert J. Moore
Robert J. Moore RMIT University
Akira Murakami
Akira Murakami Kyoto University
Saverio Bellusci
Saverio Bellusci University of Giessen
Irma Thesleff
Irma Thesleff University of Helsinki
Nobuyuki Itoh
Nobuyuki Itoh Kyoto University
David M. Ornitz
David M. Ornitz Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Molecular Biology but interested in related online pathways, there are multiple accredited programs and flexible career routes to consider. Many universities offer programs that blend biological sciences with clinical or healthcare tracks, such as RN to BSN programs. If you are comparing which online bachelor’s degrees provide the best balance of flexibility and quality, see this helpful guide on wgu vs chamberlain.

For those aiming to advance further, bridge programs are available to move from a BSN to MSN qualification efficiently, often fully online. Review top bsn to msn options to find affordable and reputable pathways that connect undergraduate science backgrounds with advanced nursing or healthcare administration.

When selecting an online school, it is crucial to find accredited, trustworthy institutions. Non-profit colleges often deliver high academic standards and better long-term value; start your search with this list of the non profit colleges offering robust online science and healthcare programs.

Prospective students with military experience or dependents should also consider options from military friendly colleges online, where flexible degree pathways, support services, and credit for prior learning can help streamline their academic journey in biology or related health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Clive Dickson

Recently Published Articles