World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
19303
World Ranking
4316
National Ranking
1503

Clinton N. Jenkins publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clinton N. Jenkins sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 86 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Clinton N. Jenkins D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clinton N. Jenkins sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clinton N. Jenkins is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States. Their primary research focuses on Environmental Science, with a significant number of publications concentrated in this field.

Their work spans several subfields including:

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Jenkins's research addresses main topics such as:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Plant and animal studies

The scientist has contributed to several publications on biodiversity and conservation efforts. Notable recent papers include:

  • "The distribution of biodiversity richness in the tropics" (2020) in Science Advances
  • "The global distribution of known and undiscovered ant biodiversity" (2022) in Science Advances
  • "Towards a global understanding of the drivers of marine and terrestrial biodiversity" (2020) in PLoS ONE
  • "Strategic protection of landslide vulnerable mountains for biodiversity conservation under land-cover and climate change impacts" (2022) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Options for prioritizing sites for biodiversity conservation with implications for "30 by 30"" (2021) in Biological Conservation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jenkins include:

  • Sebastián Heilpern
  • Elizabeth P. Anderson
  • Claire Beveridge
  • Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela
  • Sandra Bibiana Correa

The most common venues for Jenkins's research publications are:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Biological Conservation
  • Science Advances
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Biotropica

Best Publications

  • Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems

    Nick M. Haddad;Lars A. Brudvig;Jean Clobert;Kendi F. Davies

  • The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection

    S. L. Pimm;C. N. Jenkins;R. Abell;T. M. Brooks

  • Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation.

    Clinton N. Jenkins;Stuart L. Pimm;Lucas N. Joppa

  • The Impacts of Oil Palm on Recent Deforestation and Biodiversity Loss.

    Varsha Vijay;Stuart L. Pimm;Clinton N. Jenkins;Sharon J. Smith

  • Oil and Gas Projects in the Western Amazon: Threats to Wilderness, Biodiversity, and Indigenous Peoples

    Matt Finer;Clinton N. Jenkins;Stuart L. Pimm;Brian Keane

  • Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system.

    Clinton N. Jenkins;Lucas Joppa

  • Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park

    Margot S. Bass;Matt Finer;Clinton N. Jenkins;Clinton N. Jenkins;Holger Kreft

  • Proliferation of Hydroelectric Dams in the Andean Amazon and Implications for Andes-Amazon Connectivity

    Matt Finer;Clinton N. Jenkins

  • US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities.

    Clinton N. Jenkins;Kyle S. Van Houtan;Kyle S. Van Houtan;Stuart L. Pimm;Joseph O. Sexton

  • Fragmentation of Andes-to-Amazon connectivity by hydropower dams

    Elizabeth P. Anderson;Clinton N. Jenkins;Sebastian Arnold Heilpern;Javier A. Maldonado-Ocampo

  • Measuring Terrestrial Area of Habitat (AOH) and Its Utility for the IUCN Red List.

    Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Stuart L. Pimm;H. Resit Akçakaya;Graeme M. Buchanan

  • The distribution of biodiversity richness in the tropics

    Peter H. Raven;Roy E. Gereau;Peter B. Phillipson;Peter B. Phillipson;Cyrille Chatelain

  • How to protect half of Earth to ensure it protects sufficient biodiversity

    Stuart L. Pimm;Clinton N. Jenkins;Binbin V. Li

  • Remaining natural vegetation in the global biodiversity hotspots

    Sean Sloan;Clinton N. Jenkins;Lucas N. Joppa;David L.A. Gaveau

  • Effectiveness of Community Forest Management at reducing deforestation in Madagascar

    Ranaivo A. Rasolofoson;Ranaivo A. Rasolofoson;Paul J. Ferraro;Clinton N. Jenkins;Julia P.G. Jones

  • The global distribution of known and undiscovered ant biodiversity

    Unknown

  • Ecuador's Yasuní Biosphere Reserve: a brief modern history and conservation challenges

    Matt Finer;Varsha Vijay;Fernando Ponce;Clinton N Jenkins;Clinton N Jenkins

  • Targeted habitat restoration can reduce extinction rates in fragmented forests.

    William D. Newmark;Clinton N. Jenkins;Stuart L. Pimm;Phoebe B. McNeally

  • Achieving the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Goals for Plant Conservation

    L. N. Joppa;P. Visconti;C. N. Jenkins;S. L. Pimm

  • Global and regional priorities for marine biodiversity protection

    Clinton N. Jenkins;Kyle S. Van Houtan;Kyle S. Van Houtan;Kyle S. Van Houtan

  • Leaving the Oil Under the Amazon: Ecuador's Yasuní‐ITT Initiative

    Matt Finer;Remi Moncel;Clinton N. Jenkins;Clinton N. Jenkins

  • Applying Nature's Design: Corridors as a Strategy for Biodiversity Conservation

    Anthony B. Anderson;Clinton N. Jenkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart L. Pimm
Stuart L. Pimm Duke University
Kyle S. Van Houtan
Kyle S. Van Houtan Duke University
Lucas Joppa
Lucas Joppa Microsoft (United States)
Robert R. Dunn
Robert R. Dunn North Carolina State University
Benoit Guénard
Benoit Guénard University of Hong Kong
Nathan J. Sanders
Nathan J. Sanders University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
Michael D. Weiser
Michael D. Weiser University of Oklahoma
Mario S. Di Bitetti
Mario S. Di Bitetti National University of Misiones
Aaron M. Ellison
Aaron M. Ellison Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a wide range of scientific and healthcare careers. Today, online degrees offer more flexible and affordable options than ever before for building your expertise or shifting to related fields. For those considering healthcare, there are online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses that provide pathways into nursing for those with a science background but no prior nursing experience.

If you’re researching online learning, it’s helpful to compare institutions. For example, you might compare programs such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn to find which school aligns best with your needs. Affordability is also key—options for the cheapest bsn to msn online programs make further study more accessible for working professionals.

Finally, as you consider your options, it’s important to choose a reputable institution. Many students prefer some of the non profit online schools for their accreditation, affordability, and credibility in the job market. Whether you continue in science, healthcare, or interdisciplinary fields, a related online degree can significantly broaden your career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Clinton N. Jenkins

Trending Scientists