World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 51 3840 3624 1658 1558 123 13907

Christopher Lee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher Lee between 1987 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher Lee published across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2022. 14 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2022. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 2 publications
1987 2026

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher Lee: publications per year, 1987 to 2026
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 4
2002 5
2003 11
2004 11
2005 9
2006 7
2007 12
2008 7
2009 4
2010 3
2011 3
2012 4
2013 6
2014 5
2015 1
2016 3
2017 4
2018 3
2019 4
2020 3
2021 14
2022 24
2023 16
2024 16
2025 12
2026 2
Total 212
Download as CSV

Christopher Lee publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 115–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 123 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203 123
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher Lee D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141 51
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Christopher Lee is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their primary field of research is Medicine, with a focused involvement in Surgery, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

Their research work extensively covers topics related to bone fractures and treatments, hip and femur fractures, orthopedic infections and treatments, pelvic and acetabular injuries, orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation, shoulder injury and treatment, as well as trauma and emergency care studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Christopher Lee include:

  • Dane J. Brodke
  • Robert V. O'Toole
  • Lucas S. Marchand
  • Nathan N. O'Hara
  • Brendan Y. Shi

Christopher Lee has published multiple articles in well-known venues, with noteworthy frequent publication venues being:

  • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  • Orthopedic Reviews
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Injury

Recent publications by Christopher Lee include:

  • "SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Serologic Responses from a Sample of U.S. Navy Service Members - USS Theodore Roosevelt, April 2020" (2020), published in MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • "A Comprehensive Review of Viscosupplementation in Osteoarthritis of the Knee" (2021), published in Orthopedic Reviews
  • "Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F subunit vaccine DS-Cav1: a phase 1, randomised, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial" (2021), published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "Skin Antisepsis before Surgical Fixation of Extremity Fractures" (2024), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Talus Fractures: Evaluation and Treatment" (2020), published in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

The body of work reflects an emphasis on orthopedic trauma and surgical techniques, as well as epidemiological aspects of infectious diseases. Their contributions address clinical trials, surgical antisepsis, and comprehensive reviews within their areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • A genomic view of alternative splicing

    Barmak Modrek;Christopher Lee

  • Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs

    Christopher J. Lee;Catherine S. Grasso;Mark F. Sharlow

  • Genome-wide detection of alternative splicing in expressed sequences of human genes.

    Barmak Modrek;Alissa M. Resch;Catherine S. Grasso;Christopher J. Lee

  • Alternative splicing in the human, mouse and rat genomes is associated with an increased frequency of exon creation and/or loss

    Barmak Modrek;Christopher J Lee

  • Dynamic behavior of endoplasmic reticulum in living cells

    Christopher Lee;Lan Bo Chen

  • Genome‐wide detection of tissue‐specific alternative splicing in the human transcriptome

    Qiang Xu;Barmak Modrek;Christopher Lee

  • Copper staining: a five-minute protein stain for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels.

    Chris Lee;Andrew Levin;Daniel Branton

  • Prediction of protein side-chain conformation by packing optimization

    Christopher Lee;Subramanian Subbiah

  • Alternative splicing and RNA selection pressure--evolutionary consequences for eukaryotic genomes.

    Yi Xing;Christopher Lee

  • A transcriptional sketch of a primary human breast cancer by 454 deep sequencing

    Alessandro Guffanti;Michele Iacono;Paride Pelucchi;Namshin Kim;Namshin Kim

  • Accurate prediction of the stability and activity effects of site-directed mutagenesis on a protein core.

    Christopher Lee;Michael Levitt

  • Predicting Protein Mutant Energetics by Self-consistent Ensemble Optimization

    Christopher Lee

  • Discovery of novel splice forms and functional analysis of cancer‐specific alternative splicing in human expressed sequences

    Qiang Xu;Christopher Lee

  • ASAP: the Alternative Splicing Annotation Project

    Christopher J. Lee;Levan Atanelov;Barmak Modrek;Yi Xing

  • Global analysis of alternative splicing differences between humans and chimpanzees

    John A. Calarco;Yi Xing;Mario Cáceres;Joseph P. Calarco

  • Construction of the endoplasmic reticulum.

    C. Lee;M. Ferguson;Lan Bo Chen

  • Inferring protein domain interactions from databases of interacting proteins

    Robert Riley;Christopher Lee;Chiara Sabatti;David Eisenberg

  • Genome-wide analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in human expressed sequences

    Kris Irizarry;Vlad Kustanovich;Cheng Li;Nik Brown

  • An expectation-maximization algorithm for probabilistic reconstructions of full-length isoforms from splice graphs

    Yi Xing;Tianwei Yu;Ying Nian Wu;Meenakshi Roy

  • Assessing the impact of alternative splicing on domain interactions in the human proteome.

    Alissa Resch;Yi Xing;Barmak Modrek;Michael Gorlick

Frequent Co-Authors

Yi Xing
Yi Xing Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lan Bo Chen
Lan Bo Chen Harvard University
Jeffrey C. Wang
Jeffrey C. Wang University of Southern California
Stanley F. Nelson
Stanley F. Nelson University of California, Los Angeles
Harden M. McConnell
Harden M. McConnell Stanford University
Craig C. Beeson
Craig C. Beeson Medical University of South Carolina
Roger P. Woods
Roger P. Woods University of California, Los Angeles
Graziano Pesole
Graziano Pesole University of Bari Aldo Moro
Rita M. Cantor
Rita M. Cantor University of California, Los Angeles
Nelson B. Freimer
Nelson B. Freimer University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can open doors to a variety of career pathways in healthcare, research, and data analysis. Many students interested in genetics begin with foundational or related online programs, such as those offered by the best medical billing and coding schools online. These programs provide a practical introduction to medical terminology, records management, and healthcare systems, which are useful for genetics students considering entry-level positions or a broader understanding of the medical field.

Students looking to accelerate their career journey may also consider fast track degree options. These intensive programs allow learners to complete their qualifications sooner, reducing overall study time and costs.

For those balancing work and study, self paced online college courses deliver flexibility, letting you tailor your learning schedule and progress at your convenience. This is ideal for busy professionals or students who need to manage their own time.

Some institutions even offer streamlined admissions through services like majuba college online application, making it easier and more affordable to take the next step in your education and career.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles