World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
69
Citations
54151
World Ranking
2302
National Ranking
1034

Jan Fang Cheng publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Fang Cheng sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 318 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Jan Fang Cheng D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Fang Cheng sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Bacteria
  • Genome

His primary scientific interests are in Genetics, Genome, Gene, Whole genome sequencing and Computational biology. His Genome research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Archaea, Phylogenetic tree and Metagenomics. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Gene, Northern blot is strongly linked to Molecular biology.

His work deals with themes such as Phylum and Microbial population biology, which intersect with Computational biology. His studies in Cancer genome sequencing integrate themes in fields like Chimpanzee genome project, Transcriptome and Gene expression profiling. The study incorporates disciplines such as Cancer Genome Project, DNA sequencing theory, Hybrid genome assembly and Personal genomics in addition to Gene density.

His most cited work include:

  • Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. (18816 citations)
  • Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter (1378 citations)
  • A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. (811 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jan Fang Cheng mainly investigates Genetics, Genome, Gene, Whole genome sequencing and Type species. His Genetics and Plasmid, Chromosome, Genome project, DNA sequencing and Sequence investigations all form part of his Genetics research activities. His studies deal with areas such as Phylum, Computational biology, Archaea and Phylogenetic tree as well as Genome.

His Computational biology research includes themes of Metagenomics, CRISPR, Genome engineering and Genomics. Jan Fang Cheng combines subjects such as Thermophile and Molecular biology with his study of Gene. His research investigates the connection with Whole genome sequencing and areas like Bacteria which intersect with concerns in Biochemistry.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Genetics (75.08%)
  • Genome (70.27%)
  • Gene (65.47%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Genome (70.27%)
  • Computational biology (15.32%)
  • Gene (65.47%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Genome, Computational biology, Gene, Whole genome sequencing and Genetics. In his work, Phylogenetic tree and Microbial metabolism is strongly intertwined with Phylogenetics, which is a subfield of Genome. His Computational biology research includes elements of Genome engineering, Genomic library, Illumina dye sequencing, Microbial ecology and Metagenomics.

Jan Fang Cheng interconnects Synthetic biology and Enzyme in the investigation of issues within Gene. His Whole genome sequencing study combines topics in areas such as Shewanella algae, Pontibacter actiniarum, Microbiology, Comparative genomics and Rhizosphere. The concepts of his Genetics study are interwoven with issues in Natural selection and Phycomyces.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • High-resolution phylogenetic microbial community profiling (135 citations)
  • Expansion of Signal Transduction Pathways in Fungi by Extensive Genome Duplication. (114 citations)
  • Cryptic inoviruses revealed as pervasive in bacteria and archaea across Earth's biomes. (69 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Bacteria
  • DNA

Jan Fang Cheng mainly focuses on Genome, Computational biology, Gene, Genetics and Metagenomics. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Bacteria, CRISPR and Genomic library. His Genomic library study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Consensus sequence, Genomic island, Whole genome sequencing and Contig.

His Computational biology research incorporates elements of Metabolic engineering, Microbial population biology, Photorhabdus luminescens, Phylum and Microbial ecology. His studies in Gene family, Mutant, Phycomyces blakesleeanus, Signal transduction and Gene duplication are all subfields of Genetics research. His research in Metagenomics intersects with topics in Microbiome, DNA sequencing and GC-content.

Best Publications

  • Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

    Eric S. Lander;Lauren M. Linton;Bruce Birren;Chad Nusbaum

  • Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter

    Christian Rinke;Patrick Schwientek;Alexander Sczyrba;Alexander Sczyrba;Natalia N. Ivanova

  • A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

    Dongying Wu;Dongying Wu;Philip Hugenholtz;Konstantinos Mavromatis;Rüdiger Pukall

  • The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change

    Tina T. Hu;Pedro Pattyn;Erica G. Bakker;Jun Cao

  • Dicer, Drosha, and outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer

    William M. Merritt;Yvonne G. Lin;Liz Y. Han;Aparna A. Kamat

  • A physical map of the human genome.

    John Douglas Mcpherson;Marco Marra;Marco Marra;La Deana Hillier;Robert H. Waterston

  • Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome

    Shin-ichi Horike;Shutao Cai;Masaru Miyano;Jan-Fang Cheng

  • A Regulatory SNP Causes a Human Genetic Disease by Creating a New Transcriptional Promoter

    Marco De Gobbi;Vip Viprakasit;Jim R Hughes;Chris Fisher

  • Assembling the marine metagenome, one cell at a time.

    Tanja Woyke;Gary Xie;Alex Copeland;José M. González

  • Functional screening of 2 Mb of human chromosome 21q22.2 in transgenic mice implicates minibrain in learning defects associated with Down syndrome

    Desmond J. Smith;Mary E. Stevens;Sharmila P. Sudanagunta;Roderick T. Bronson

  • A genome-wide screen identifies a single β-defensin gene cluster in the chicken: implications for the origin and evolution of mammalian defensins

    Yanjing Xiao;Austin L. Hughes;Junko Ando;Yoichi Matsuda

  • Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome

    V. G. Cheung;N. Nowak;W. Jang;I. R. Kirsch

  • Narrowing and genomic annotation of the commonly deleted region of the 5q syndrome

    Jacqueline Boultwood;Carrie Fidler;Amanda J. Strickson;Fiona Watkins

  • Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Mouse and Human Protocadherin Gene Clusters

    Qiang Wu;Theresa Zhang;Jan Fang Cheng;Youngwook Kim

  • Runx1-mediated hematopoietic stem-cell emergence is controlled by a Gata/Ets/SCL-regulated enhancer

    Wade T. Nottingham;Andrew Jarratt;Matthew Burgess;Caroline L. Speck

  • A novel gene, NSD1, is fused to NUP98 in the t(5;11)(q35;p15.5) in de novo childhood acute myeloid leukemia.

    Rina J. Jaju;Carrie Fidler;Oskar A. Haas;Amanda J. Strickson

  • Complete genomic sequence of the human ABCA1 gene: Analysis of the human and mouse ATP-binding cassette A promoter

    Silvia Santamarina-Fojo;Katherine Peterson;Catherine Knapper;Yang Qiu

  • Gene Expression Profiles of Normal Human Fibroblasts after Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: A Comparative Study of Low and High Doses

    Liang Hao Ding;Masato Shingyoji;Fanqing Chen;Jeng Jong Hwang;Jeng Jong Hwang

  • One Bacterial Cell, One Complete Genome

    Tanja Woyke;Damon Tighe;Konstantinos Mavromatis;Alicia Clum

  • High-resolution phylogenetic microbial community profiling

    Esther Singer;Brian Bushnell;Devin Coleman-Derr;Devin Coleman-Derr;Brett Bowman

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynne Goodwin
Lynne Goodwin Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jonathan A. Eisen
Jonathan A. Eisen University of California, Davis
Miriam Land
Miriam Land Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Cliff Han
Cliff Han Los Alamos National Laboratory
Loren Hauser
Loren Hauser Digital Infuzion (United States)
John C. Detter
John C. Detter Los Alamos National Laboratory
Philip Hugenholtz
Philip Hugenholtz University of Queensland
Alla Lapidus
Alla Lapidus Saint Petersburg State University
Nikos C. Kyrpides
Nikos C. Kyrpides Joint Genome Institute
Natalia Ivanova
Natalia Ivanova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and career avenues. With the growing demand for skilled professionals in healthcare and the sciences, students can benefit from flexible online education options.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding online schools offer specialized training and can be a great alternative or complement to genetics studies. These programs often provide financial aid options, making them accessible for a variety of learners.

Time-conscious students may consider accelerated degrees to fast-track their way into the workforce. More flexible study is also available through self paced accredited online college programs, which allow you to set your own schedule and balance commitments.

Many aspiring professionals look for affordable pathways. Choosing from online colleges no application fee can help keep costs down during the admissions process.

Whether you’re pursuing advanced genetics or a related healthcare field, online education offers a variety of options to suit different goals and lifestyles.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Fang Cheng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles