World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruce W. A. Whittlesea

Bruce W. A. Whittlesea

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
6547
World Ranking
11091
National Ranking
769

Bruce W. A. Whittlesea publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce W. A. Whittlesea sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 46 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bruce W. A. Whittlesea D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce W. A. Whittlesea sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce W. A. Whittlesea was affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada during their academic career. Their work contributed to the field through various research activities and collaborations.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues available from the available data. No specific book publications or details about awards were documented.

The scientist's research fields, subfields, and main topics of work remain unspecified, with no detailed records of publications in particular areas.

The absence of detailed publication lists and coauthor information limits a more thorough overview of their contributions. However, the association with Simon Fraser University marks their professional connection within the Canadian academic landscape.

Best Publications

  • Illusions of familiarity.

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea

  • Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality

    Bruce W.A Whittlesea;Larry L Jacoby;Krista Girard

  • Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.

    Bruce W.A. Whittlesea;Lisa D. Williams

  • The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Lisa D. Williams

  • The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Lisa D. Williams

  • Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning

    Bruce W. Whittlesea;Michael D. Dorken

  • The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity.

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Lisa D. Williams

  • Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: rethinking the mere exposure effect.

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;John R. Price

  • Preservation of Specific Experiences in the Representation of General Knowledge

    Bruce W. Whittlesea

  • Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning.

    Unknown

  • The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance.

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Jason Po Leboe

  • Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart)

    Bruce W.A Whittlesea;Jason P Leboe

  • Increasing confidence in remote autobiographical memory and general knowledge: Extensions of the revelation effect

    Daniel M. Bernstein;Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Elizabeth F. Loftus

  • Implicit (and explicit) learning: acting adaptively without knowing the consequences.

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Richard L. Wright

  • False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: the prototype-familiarity illusion.

    Bruce W A Whittlesea

  • Production, Evaluation, and Preservation of Experiences: Constructive Processing in Remembering and Performance Tasks

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea

  • Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon?

    Bruce W.A Whittlesea;Larry L Jacoby

  • Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not)

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea

  • Critical influence of particular experiences in the perception of letters, words, and phrases

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Lee R. Brooks

  • Implicit learning of complex structures: active adaptation and selective processing in acquisition and application

    Richard L. Wright;Bruce W. A. Whittlesea

  • After the learning is over: factors controlling the selective application of general and particular knowledge

    Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Lee R. Brooks;Carol Westcott

  • Consumer Memory, Fluency, and Familiarity

    Antonia Mantonakis;Bruce W. A. Whittlesea;Carolyn Yoon

  • Increasing Confidence in Remote Autobiographical Memory and General Knowledge: Extensions of the Revelation Effect

    Daniel M. Bernstein;Daniel M. Bernstein;Elizabeth F. Loftus;Bruce W. A. whittlesea

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel M. Bernstein
Daniel M. Bernstein Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Michael E. J. Masson
Michael E. J. Masson University of Victoria
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine
Larry L. Jacoby
Larry L. Jacoby Washington University in St. Louis
Lee R. Brooks
Lee R. Brooks McMaster University
Bruce Milliken
Bruce Milliken McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a range of online programs and dynamic career pathways. One popular field is speech-language pathology, where professionals support individuals facing communication disorders. Becoming a licensed speech-language pathologist (SLP) requires meeting specific educational and certification requirements that vary by state. For instance, to practice in Louisiana, you’ll need to meet Louisiana slp certification requirements including a master’s degree, clinical experience, and state licensing exams.

Certification processes are similar but nuanced in other states. Those interested in practicing in Maine must fulfill Maine speech pathologist certification requirements as well as supervised practice. In Maryland, understanding Maryland slp certification requirements is vital for ensuring lawful practice. Meanwhile, Massachusetts professionals should review Massachusetts speech pathologist certification requirements.

Exploring these requirements can help you choose the right online degree program and map out your pathway to becoming a certified SLP or professional in related psychological services.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce W. A. Whittlesea

Recently Published Articles