World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
6699
World Ranking
8462
National Ranking
3617

Bruce N. Walker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce N. Walker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 211 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bruce N. Walker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce N. Walker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce N. Walker is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields within psychology, with an emphasis on social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, human-computer interaction, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as safety, risk, reliability, and quality.

The scientist has contributed to several specific research topics including:

  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Multisensory perception and integration

Bruce N. Walker has published multiple papers over recent years in a variety of academic venues. Notable publications include:

  • "Spotlights and Soundscapes" (2020) in ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
  • "The human and non-human primate developmental GTEx projects" (2025) in Nature
  • "The importance of incorporating risk into human-automation trust" (2021) in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
  • "Interactive Workshops in a Pandemic: The Real Benefits of Virtual Spaces" (2021) in IEEE Pervasive Computing
  • "Incorporating Situation Awareness Cues in Virtual Reality for Users in Dynamic in-Vehicle Environments" (2022) in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Frequent venues where Bruce N. Walker has published include:

  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Nature
  • ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
  • Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Their research collaborations involve several frequent coauthors, illustrating a breadth of cooperative work. Key coauthors with multiple joint publications include:

  • Rachel E. Stuck
  • Nadia Fereydooni
  • Brittany E. Holthausen
  • Sidney T. Scott-Sharoni
  • Keenan R. May

Best Publications

  • Sonific ation Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda

    Gregory Kramer;Bruce Walker;Terri Bonebright;Perry Cook

  • USABILITY ASSESSMENT OF DRONE TECHNOLOGY AS SAFETY INSPECTION TOOLS

    Javier Irizarry;Masoud Gheisari;Bruce N. Walker

  • SWAN: System for Wearable Audio Navigation

    J. Wilson;B.N. Walker;J. Lindsay;C. Cambias

  • Effects of specific emotions on subjective judgment, driving performance, and perceived workload

    Myounghoon Jeon;Bruce N. Walker;Jung-Bin Yim

  • Mappings and metaphors in auditory displays: An experimental assessment

    Bruce N. Walker;Gregory Kramer

  • SPEARCONS: SPEECH-BASED EARCONS IMPROVE NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE IN AUDITORY MENUS

    Bruce N. Walker;Amanda Nance;Jeffrey Lindsay

  • InfoSPOT: A mobile Augmented Reality method for accessing building information through a situation awareness approach

    Javier Irizarry;Masoud Gheisari;Graceline Williams;Bruce N. Walker

  • Magnitude estimation of conceptual data dimensions for use in sonification.

    Bruce N. Walker

  • Learnabiltiy of Sound Cues for Environmental Features: Auditory Icons, Earcons, Spearcons, and Speech

    Tilman Dingler;Jeffrey Lindsay;Bruce N. Walker;Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

  • SONIFICATION SANDBOX: A GRAPHICAL TOOLKIT FOR AUDITORY GRAPHS

    Bruce N. Walker;Joshua T. Cothran

  • Auditory Displays for In-Vehicle Technologies:

    Michael A. Nees;Bruce N. Walker

  • Universal Design of Auditory Graphs: A Comparison of Sonification Mappings for Visually Impaired and Sighted Listeners

    B. N. Walker;L. M. Mauney

  • Spearcons (Speech-Based Earcons) Improve Navigation Performance in Advanced Auditory Menus

    Bruce N. Walker;Jeffrey Lindsay;Amanda Nance;Yoko Nakano

  • Situational Trust Scale for Automated Driving (STS-AD): Development and Initial Validation

    Brittany E. Holthausen;Philipp Wintersberger;Bruce N. Walker;Andreas Riener

  • UAS4SAFETY: The Potential of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Construction Safety Applications

    Masoud Gheisari;Javier Irizarry;Bruce N Walker

  • Navigation performance in a virtual environment with bonephones

    Bruce N. Walker;Jeffrey Lindsay

  • LEARNING RATES FOR AUDITORY MENUS ENHANCED WITH SPEARCONS VERSUS EARCONS

    Dianne K. Palladino;Bruce N. Walker

  • PSYCHOPHYSICAL SCALING OF SONIFICATION MAPPINGS: A COMPARISION OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED AND SIGHTED LISTENERS

    Bruce N. Walker;David M. Lane

  • Map-based priors for localization

    Sang Min Oh;S. Tariq;B.N. Walker;F. Dellaert

  • Auditory Interfaces and Sonification.

    Michael A. Nees;Bruce N. Walker

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Lane
David M. Lane Rice University
Frank Dellaert
Frank Dellaert Georgia Institute of Technology
Blair MacIntyre
Blair MacIntyre Georgia Institute of Technology
Thad Starner
Thad Starner Georgia Institute of Technology
Larry F. Hodges
Larry F. Hodges Clemson University
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Doug A. Bowman
Doug A. Bowman Virginia Tech
Marianna Obrist
Marianna Obrist University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science shouldn’t be limited by location, finances, or academic history. Many students start with an online associate's degree in computer science or a related field. This flexible option lets you enter the tech industry quickly and can provide a stepping stone to a bachelor's program.

Affordability is also a key factor. You can find the cheapest online colleges that deliver high-quality computer science education while keeping tuition manageable.

Not every student has a perfect GPA, but plenty of online colleges that accept low gpa offer accessible programs for motivated learners who want to jumpstart their tech careers.

Computer science isn’t the only in-demand field online. If you’re passionate about sustainability or the environment, explore what career options are possible with an environmental studies degree – a growing area that intersects with technology and offers diverse pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce N. Walker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles