World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Poland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
15451
World Ranking
4231
National Ranking
9

Jacek Blazewicz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Blazewicz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 363 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jacek Blazewicz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Blazewicz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Poland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Poland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Poland Leader Award
  • 2013 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to combinatorial models of task scheduling
  • 2010 - Polish Academy of Science
  • 1991 - EURO Gold Medal

Overview

Jacek Blazewicz is affiliated with the Poznań University of Technology in Poland. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Engineering and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on subfields such as Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Computer Networks and Communications, alongside contributions related to Astronomy and Astrophysics and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's research topics include Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms, Optimization and Search Problems, Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization, Assembly Line Balancing Optimization, Origins and Evolution of Life, Optimization and Packing Problems, and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Semi-online scheduling on two identical machines with a common due date to maximize total early work, 2020, Discrete Applied Mathematics
  • Exact and heuristic algorithms for scheduling on two identical machines with early work maximization, 2020, Computers & Industrial Engineering
  • Learning vector quantization as an interpretable classifier for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 types based on their RNA sequences, 2021, Neural Computing and Applications
  • Mirror scheduling problems with early work and late work criteria, 2020, Journal of Scheduling
  • Two-machine flow shop scheduling with a common due date to maximize total early work, 2021, European Journal of Operational Research

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Małgorzata Sterna, Xin Chen, Piotr Łukasiak, Thomas Villmann, and Maciej Antczak.

Jacek Blazewicz has published extensively in several venues, regularly contributing to the Journal of Scheduling, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Bioinformatics, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, and Computational Methods in Science and Technology.

The scientist has received several awards, including the IEEE Fellow distinction in 2013 for contributions to combinatorial models of task scheduling, membership in the Polish Academy of Science in 2010, and the EURO Gold Medal in 1991.

Best Publications

  • Scheduling subject to resource constraints: classification and complexity

    Jacek Blazewicz;Jan Karel Lenstra;A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan

  • Scheduling Computer and Manufacturing Processes

    Jacek Błażewicz;Klaus H. Ecker;Erwin Pesch;Günter Schmidt

  • Automated 3D structure composition for large RNAs

    Mariusz Popenda;Marta Szachniuk;Maciej Antczak;Katarzyna J. Purzycka

  • The Job Shop Scheduling Problem: Conventional and new Solution Techniques

    Jacek Błażewicz;Wolfgang Domschke;Erwin Pesch

  • Scheduling in Computer and Manufacturing Systems

    Jacek Blazewicz

  • Sequencing of Parts and Robot Moves in a Robotic Cell

    S. P. Sethi;C. Sriskandarajah;G. Sorger;J. Blazewicz

  • Handbook on Scheduling : From Theory to Practice

    Jacek Blazewicz;Klaus H. Ecker;Erwin Pesch;Günter Schmidt

  • Handbook on Scheduling: From Theory to Applications

    Jacek Blazewicz;Klaus H. Ecker;Erwin Pesch;Gnter Schmidt

  • Scheduling under resource constraints - deterministic models

    Jacek Błażewicz

  • Scheduling under Resource Constraints

    Jacek Błażewicz;Klaus H. Ecker;Erwin Pesch;Günter Schmidt

  • Mathematical programming formulations for machine scheduling: a survey

    Jacek Blazewicz;Moshe Dror;Moshe Dror;Jan Weglarz

  • Handbook on Scheduling: Models and Methods for Advanced Planning (International Handbooks on Information Systems)

    Jacek Blazewicz;Klaus Ecker;Erwin Pesch;Günter Schmidt

  • Scheduling Multiprocessor Tasks to Minimize Schedule Length

    Unknown

  • Automated RNA 3D Structure Prediction with RNAComposer

    Marcin Biesiada;Marcin Biesiada;Katarzyna J. Purzycka;Marta Szachniuk;Marta Szachniuk;Jacek Blazewicz;Jacek Blazewicz

  • RNA FRABASE 2.0: an advanced web-accessible database with the capacity to search the three-dimensional fragments within RNA structures

    Mariusz Popenda;Marta Szachniuk;Marta Szachniuk;Marek Blazewicz;Szymon Wasik

  • Two-machine flow shops with limited machine availability

    Wiesław Kubiak;Jacek Błażewicz;Jacek Błażewicz;Piotr Formanowicz;Piotr Formanowicz;Joachim Breit

  • Selected Topics in Scheduling Theory

    Jacek Błażewicz

  • Scheduling Dependent Tasks with Different Arrival Times to Meet Deadlines

    Jacek Blazewicz

  • Using a tabu search approach for solving the two-dimensional irregular cutting problem

    J. Błażewicz;P. Hawryluk;R. Walkowiak

  • An improved approximation algorithm for the single machine total completion time scheduling problem with availability constraints

    Cherif Sadfi;Bernard Penz;Christophe Rapine;Jacek Błażewicz

  • Scheduling subject to resource constraints: classification and complexity : (preprint)

    J. Blazewicz;Jan Karel Lenstra;A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan

Frequent Co-Authors

Erwin Pesch
Erwin Pesch University of Siegen
Jan Weglarz
Jan Weglarz Poznań University of Technology
Edmund K. Burke
Edmund K. Burke Bangor University
Mikhail Y. Kovalyov
Mikhail Y. Kovalyov National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Pascal Bouvry
Pascal Bouvry University of Luxembourg
D. de Werra
D. de Werra École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Frank Werner
Frank Werner Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Natalio Krasnogor
Natalio Krasnogor Newcastle University
Graham Kendall
Graham Kendall MILA University
Alain Hertz
Alain Hertz Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA means discovering a range of online educational opportunities. Many students start their journey with accredited online colleges, ensuring their degree is recognized and valued by employers. Accreditation is critical, as it impacts both job prospects and eligibility for further education.

Specialization is another key consideration. For those interested in interactive media, pursuing a game design masters online can open doors in the growing video game industry. If you’re drawn to technology security, a cyber security degree can help you build skills vital for protecting digital assets in today's connected world.

Beyond tech-specific fields, interdisciplinary options exist as well. A construction management degree online cost guide can help you weigh the options if you wish to blend technical skills with project leadership in construction environments.

Today, top online programs offer flexibility, affordability, and strong career pathways. Carefully comparing costs, accreditation, and course content can help you choose the best route for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jacek Blazewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles