World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3359 3092 232 222 246 10721

Betty Weiler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Betty Weiler between 1989 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Betty Weiler published across 35 years, from 1989 to 2023, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2012. 2 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2012. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications
1989 2023

250 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Betty Weiler: publications per year, 1989 to 2023
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 5
1994 1
1995 3
1996 0
1997 4
1998 1
1999 4
2000 2
2001 8
2002 7
2003 8
2004 5
2005 5
2006 6
2007 7
2008 16
2009 16
2010 8
2011 10
2012 22
2013 17
2014 16
2015 12
2016 10
2017 18
2018 15
2019 7
2020 7
2021 4
2022 0
2023 2
Total 250
Download as CSV

Betty Weiler publications per year - data summary

  • Betty Weiler, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Southern Cross University, has 250 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1989 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 22 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1994 and 1998, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 35 years in the span carry no publications at all (1990, 1991, 1996 and 2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.1 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 20 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2000: 24 publications (2.0 per year); 2001-2012: 118 publications (9.8 per year); 2013-2023: 108 publications (9.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Betty Weiler publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Betty Weiler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 244–253 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 246 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167 246
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Betty Weiler publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Betty Weiler, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Southern Cross University, records 246 publications - the 78th percentile of the discipline.
  • 78% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Betty Weiler, and about 22% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Betty Weiler ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Betty Weiler D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Betty Weiler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Betty Weiler D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Betty Weiler, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Southern Cross University, records 47 D-Index - the 59th percentile of the discipline.
  • 59% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Betty Weiler, and about 41% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Betty Weiler ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Betty Weiler is affiliated with Southern Cross University in Australia and focuses on research in the fields of Environmental Science and Social Sciences. Their work intersects multiple subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas with a notable emphasis on Urban Green Space and Health, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research, Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management, Ichthyology and Marine Biology, Marine Animal Studies Overview, and Fish Ecology and Management Studies.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Betty Weiler are:

  • Selfies to die for: A review of research on self-photography associated with injury/death in tourism and recreation, 2020, Tourism Management Perspectives
  • Beach-user perceptions and attitudes towards drone surveillance as a shark-bite mitigation tool, 2020, Marine Policy
  • From Human Wellbeing to an Ecocentric Perspective: How Nature-Connectedness Can Extend the Benefits of Marine Wildlife Experiences, 2020, Anthrozoös
  • Responsibility and preparedness for risk in national parks: results of a visitor survey, 2020, Tourism Recreation Research
  • Encounters with Wild, Ecotour, and Captive Marine Mammals: What Do They Tell Us About Human Well-Being and Environmental Behavior?, 2020, Tourism in Marine Environments

Frequent collaborators include Rachel Yerbury, Kirin Apps, Anna Maria Gstaettner, William Boyd, and Debra Stokes. These partnerships reflect an interdisciplinary approach spanning environmental, social, and recreational dimensions of their research.

Their scholarly contributions have been published in several specialized venues, including:

  • Marine Policy
  • Tourism Management Perspectives
  • Anthrozoös
  • Tourism Recreation Research
  • Tourism in Marine Environments

Best Publications

  • Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach

    Haywantee Ramkissoon;Liam David Graham Smith;Betty Virginia Weiler

  • Special-Interest Tourism

    B. Weiler;C. M. Hall

  • Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behaviour in National Parks: The Development of a Conceptual Framework

    Haywantee Ramkissoon;Betty Weiler;Liam David Graham Smith

  • Trends and patterns in sustainable tourism research: a 25-year bibliometric analysis

    Lisa Ruhanen;Betty Weiler;Brent D Moyle;Char-lee J McLennan

  • Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian national park

    Haywantee Ramkissoon;Liam David Graham Smith;Betty Virginia Weiler

  • An exploratory investigation into the roles of the nature-based tour leader

    Betty Weiler;Derrin Davis

  • Tour Guide Training: A Model for Sustainable Capacity Building in Developing Countries

    Betty Weiler;Sam H. Ham

  • Arts and heritage tourism.

    H. Zeppel;C. M. Hall;B. Weiler

  • Tour guides and interpretation

    Betty Weiler;Sam Ham

  • Effects of Interpretive Guiding Outcomes on Tourist Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention

    Songshan (Sam) Huang;Betty Weiler;Guy Assaker;Guy Assaker

  • Intercultural communication and mediation: A framework for analysing the intercultural competence of Chinese tour guides:

    Xin Yu;Betty Weiler;Sam Ham

  • Mediating Meaning: Perspectives on Brokering Quality Tourist Experiences

    Gayle Jennings;Betty Virginia Weiler

  • Tour Guiding Research: Insights, Issues and Implications

    Betty Weiler;Rosemary Black

  • Quality assurance and regulatory mechanisms in the tour guiding industry: a systematic review.

    Rosemary Black;Betty Virginia Weiler

  • Examining transformative processes in volunteer tourism

    Alexandra Coghlan;Betty Weiler

  • The changing face of the tour guide: one-way communicator to choreographer to co-creator of the tourist experience

    Betty Weiler;Rosemary Black

  • A closer examination of the impact of zoo visits on visitor behaviour.

    Liam David Graham Smith;Sue Broad;Betty Virginia Weiler

  • Does more interpretation lead to greater outcomes? An assessment of the impacts of multiple layers of interpretation in a zoo context

    Betty Virginia Weiler;Liam David Graham Smith

  • Extreme, extravagant and elite: a profile of ecotourists on Earthwatch expeditions.

    Betty Weiler;Harold Richins

  • Enhancing the visitor experience: reconceptualising the tour guide’s communicative role

    Betty Weiler;Kaye Walker

  • Destination Brand Identity, Values, and Community: A Case Study From Rural Victoria, Australia

    Fiona Wheeler;Warwick Frost;Betty Weiler

Frequent Co-Authors

Brent D Moyle
Brent D Moyle Griffith University
Susan A. Moore
Susan A. Moore Murdoch University
Erica Wilson
Erica Wilson Southern Cross University
Michael Lockwood
Michael Lockwood University of Tasmania
Haywantee Ramkissoon
Haywantee Ramkissoon University of South Australia
Lisa Ruhanen
Lisa Ruhanen University of Queensland
Songshan (Sam) Huang
Songshan (Sam) Huang Edith Cowan University
Guy Assaker
Guy Assaker Lebanese American University
Bill Faulkner
Bill Faulkner Griffith University
Roy Ballantyne
Roy Ballantyne University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities? Online learning offers flexible paths to launch or advance your career. Many students choose online master's programs to gain advanced knowledge quickly and balance study with work or family obligations.

If you want to graduate even faster, accelerated degree programs can help you finish your bachelor’s in less time, often in as little as two to three years. These options are ideal for motivated learners eager to begin their careers or pursue further studies.

Cost is a common concern. Social work remains a popular pathway, and you can find the cheapest msw programs online to obtain an accredited qualification without overspending. Those interested in behavioral analysis can also benefit from bcba online masters programs that offer strong career prospects in education and healthcare.

With these flexible and affordable online pathways, pursuing a degree in Social Sciences or Humanities in the USA is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Betty Weiler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles