World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
13679
World Ranking
9500
National Ranking
4025

J. Strother Moore publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Strother Moore sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 156 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

J. Strother Moore D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Strother Moore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to automated reasoning about computing systems.
  • 2006 - ACM Fellow For contributions to mechanized theorem proving.
  • 2005 - ACM Software System Award For pioneering and engineering a most effective theorem prover (named the Boyer-Moore Theorem Prover) as a formal methods tool for verifying safety-critical hardware and software.

Overview

J. Strother Moore is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on subfields such as Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, and Hardware and Architecture.

Their scholarly work addresses several main topics including Logic, programming, and type systems, Numerical Methods and Algorithms, Formal Methods in Verification, Particle accelerators and beam dynamics, Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Magnetic confinement fusion research, and Low-power high-performance VLSI design.

Moore has contributed to a range of publications, prominently in venues such as:

  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Formal Aspects of Computing

Notable recent papers include:

  • Iteration in ACL2 (2020), Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • VWSIM: A Circuit Simulator (2022), Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • 324: Evaluating parental and child knowledge of the role and function of enzymes in cystic fibrosis before and after a novel educational animated video (2021), Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Proceedings Seventeenth International Workshop on the ACL2 Theorem Prover and its Applications (2022), Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • Advances in ACL2 Proof Debugging Tools (2023), Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science

Frequent coauthors in Moore's research include:

  • Matt Kaufmann
  • Warren A. Hunt
  • Vivek Ramanathan
  • Enid Wright
  • C McCabe

Their work involves contributions across logic and formal verification methodologies, theorem proving applications, and simulation tools.

Moore has received several awards acknowledging their professional achievements:

  • Member of the National Academy of Engineering (2007) for contributions to automated reasoning about computing systems
  • ACM Fellow (2006) for contributions to mechanized theorem proving
  • ACM Software System Award (2005) for pioneering and engineering a theorem prover used in verifying safety-critical hardware and software

Best Publications

  • A fast string searching algorithm

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

  • A computational logic

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

  • Computer-aided reasoning : ACL2 case studies

    Matt Kaufmann;Panagiotis Manolios;J. Strother Moore

  • Computer-Aided Reasoning: An Approach

    Matt Kaufmann;J. Strother Moore;Panagiotis Manolios

  • A Computational Logic Handbook

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

  • Proving Theorems about LISP Functions

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

  • MJRTY—A Fast Majority Vote Algorithm

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

  • An Industrial Strength Theorem Prover for a Logic Based on Common Lisp

    Unknown

  • An approach to systems verification

    William R. Bevier;Warren A. Hunt;J. Strother Moore;William D. Young

  • The Correctness Problem in Computer Science

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

  • Metafunctions: Proving Them Correct and Using Them Efficiently as New Proof Procedures.

    Robert S Boyer;J Strother Moore

  • ACL2 Theorems About Commercial Microprocessors

    Bishop Brock;Matt Kaufmann;J. Strother Moore

  • ACL2: an industrial strength version of Nqthm

    M. Kaufmann;J. Strother Moore

  • A mechanically verified language implementation

    J. Strother Moore

  • Piton: A Mechanically Verified Assembly-Level Language

    J. Strother Moore

  • The Boyer-Moore theorem prover and its interactive enhancement

    Unknown

  • A Mechanically Checked Proof of the AMD5K86TM Floating Point Division Program

    Unknown

  • System verification

    J. Strother Moore

  • Structured Theory Development for a Mechanized Logic

    Matt Kaufmann;J. Strother Moore

  • Single-Threaded Objects in ACL2

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

  • Functional instantiation in first-order logic

    Robert S. Boyer;David M. Goldschlag;Matt Kaufmann;J. Strother Moore

  • Symbolic Simulation: An ACL2 Approach

    J. Strother Moore

  • A Mechanical Proof of the Unsolvability of the Halting Problem

    Robert S. Boyer;J. Strother Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

George Porter
George Porter University of California, San Diego
Robert B. Schnabel
Robert B. Schnabel University of Colorado Boulder
Fernando Pereira
Fernando Pereira Google (United States)
Bruce G. Buchanan
Bruce G. Buchanan University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens a range of pathways for students interested in shaping their tech careers. Graduates with a Computer Science background often enhance their credentials with advanced degrees in specialized or leadership fields. For those seeking to broaden their business acumen alongside technology skills, affordable online executive mba programs offer a flexible and cost-effective option to gain executive-level training.

If you’re interested in fields bridging information technology and knowledge management, a library science degree can be a smart choice. Learn more about the master's in library science online cost to see if this fits your career goals.

Many students now prioritize cost when considering further study. Choosing one of the least expensive online masters can help balance academic ambitions with financial realities.

For those aiming for top-tier leadership or academic roles, a doctorate in organizational leadership can be a strategic step. Whichever path you pursue, online education offers flexible, affordable, and career-focused routes tailored to your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing J. Strother Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles