World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5035
World Ranking
7567
National Ranking
551

Joachim Wassermann publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Wassermann sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 167 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Joachim Wassermann D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Wassermann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joachim Wassermann is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany and has an extensive publication record focusing on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Engineering. Their research encompasses multiple specialized subfields including Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Atmospheric Science.

Their work covers a range of topics primarily within Seismic Waves and Analysis, Geophysics and Sensor Technology, Seismology and Earthquake Studies, High-pressure geophysics and materials, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors, and earthquake and tectonic studies.

Wassermann's recent papers include the following:

  • Global quieting of high-frequency seismic noise due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures, 2020, Science
  • Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources, 2021, Sensors
  • Reconstruction of the Instantaneous Earth Rotation Vector with Sub-Arcsecond Resolution Using a Large Scale Ring Laser Array, 2020, Physical Review Letters
  • Seismological Processing of Six Degree-of-Freedom Ground-Motion Data, 2020, Sensors
  • ROMY: a multicomponent ring laser for geodesy and geophysics, 2021, Geophysical Journal International

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Wassermann include Heiner Igel, Felix Bernauer, Shihao Yuan, Sabrina Keil, and Stefanie Donner.

Wassermann publishes regularly in key scientific venues such as Sensors, Seismological Research Letters, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Geophysical Journal International, and Seismica. These journals reflect the interdisciplinary nature of the scientist's work, spanning both applied and theoretical aspects of geosciences and engineering.

Best Publications

  • ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology

    Moritz Beyreuther;Robert Barsch;Lion Krischer;Tobias Megies

  • ObsPy: a bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem

    Lion Krischer;Tobias Megies;Robert Barsch;Moritz Beyreuther

  • Global quieting of high-frequency seismic noise due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures.

    Thomas Lecocq;Stephen P. Hicks;Koen Van Noten;Kasper van Wijk

  • ObsPy – What can it do for data centers and observatories?

    Tobias Megies;Moritz Beyreuther;Robert Barsch;Lion Krischer

  • Evidence for rainfall‐triggered earthquake activity

    S. Hainzl;T. Kraft;J. Wassermann;H. Igel

  • Broad-band observations of earthquake-induced rotational ground motions

    Heiner Igel;Alain Cochard;Joachim Wassermann;Asher Flaws;Asher Flaws

  • Seismogenic lavas and explosive eruption forecasting

    Y. Lavallée;P. G. Meredith;D. B. Dingwell;K.-U. Hess

  • The AlpArray Seismic Network: A Large-Scale European Experiment to Image the Alpine Orogen

    György Hetényi;Irene Molinari;John Clinton;Götz Bokelmann

  • Rotational Motions in Seismology: Theory, Observation, Simulation

    Alain Cochard;H. Igel;B. Schuberth;W. Suryanto

  • First Comparison of Array-Derived Rotational Ground Motions with Direct Ring Laser Measurements

    W. Suryanto;H. Igel;J. Wassermann;A. Cochard

  • BlueSeis3A: Full Characterization of a 3C Broadband Rotational Seismometer

    Felix Bernauer;Joachim Wassermann;Frederic Guattari;Arnaud Frenois

  • Spectral analysis of harmonic tremor signals at Mt. Semeru volcano, Indonesia

    Vera Schlindwein;Joachim Wassermann;Frank Scherbaum

  • Ring Laser Measurements of Ground Rotations for Seismology

    K. U. Schreiber;J. N. Hautmann;A. Velikoseltsev;J. Wassermann

  • Continuous Hidden Markov Models: Application to automatic earthquake detection and classification at Las Canãdas caldera, Tenerife

    Moritz Beyreuther;Roberto Carniel;Roberto Carniel;Joachim Wassermann

  • The 26 May 2006 magnitude 6.4 Yogyakarta earthquake south of Mt. Merapi volcano: Did lahar deposits amplify ground shaking and thus lead to the disaster?

    T. R. Walter;R. Wang;B.-G. Luehr;J. Wassermann

  • Continuous earthquake detection and classification using discrete Hidden Markov Models

    Moritz Beyreuther;Joachim Wassermann

  • Examining ambient noise using colocated measurements of rotational and translational motion

    Celine Hadziioannou;Peter Gaebler;Ulrich Schreiber;Joachim Wassermann

  • Rotational sensors—a comparison of different sensor types

    Felix Bernauer;Joachim Wassermann;Heiner Igel

  • Meteorological triggering of earthquake swarms at Mt. Hochstaufen, SE-Germany

    T. Kraft;J. Wassermann;E. Schmedes;H. Igel

  • Microseismicity observed at a non-pressure-stimulated geothermal power plant

    Tobias Megies;Joachim Wassermann

  • Constructing a Hidden Markov Model based earthquake detector: application to induced seismicity

    Moritz Beyreuther;Conny Hammer;Joachim Wassermann;Matthias Ohrnberger

  • Advances in 6C seismology: Applications of combined translational and rotational motion measurements in global and exploration seismology

    Cedric Schmelzbach;Stefanie Donner;Heiner Igel;David Sollberger

  • Performance Test of a Commercial Rotational Motions Sensor

    Joachim Wassermann;Susanne Lehndorfer;Heiner Igel;Ulrich Schreiber

  • ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology

    J. M. Wassermann;L. Krischer;T. Megies;R. Barsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Heiner Igel
Heiner Igel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frank Scherbaum
Frank Scherbaum University of Potsdam
Matthias Ohrnberger
Matthias Ohrnberger University of Potsdam
Frederik Tilmann
Frederik Tilmann Freie Universität Berlin
Simone Cesca
Simone Cesca University of Potsdam
Frank L. Vernon
Frank L. Vernon University of California, San Diego
Raphaël F. Garcia
Raphaël F. Garcia National Higher French Institute of Aeronautics and Space
György Hetényi
György Hetényi University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to a variety of related fields that complement and enhance your expertise. For those considering further specialization, programs such as a is a masters in library science worth it can offer valuable skills in research and data management, essential for handling scientific information effectively.

Creative professionals might find a connection through visual documentation, making an online degree in photography a practical choice. This skill is useful for capturing geological formations or environmental changes, enhancing communication in scientific presentations.

Veterans interested in blending technical skills with creative outlets should explore the best military friendly online photography degrees. These programs are tailored for military backgrounds and can ease the transition into civilian careers connected to Earth Science photography or environmental documentation.

Language skills also expand career options. Studying online offers options like the spanish degree online, which can enhance communication in diverse regions and open opportunities in international research or consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Wassermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles