World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bent Halling-Sørensen

Bent Halling-Sørensen

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
17583
World Ranking
4144
National Ranking
54

Bent Halling-Sørensen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bent Halling-Sørensen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 110 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Bent Halling-Sørensen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bent Halling-Sørensen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment- A review

    Unknown

  • Are veterinary medicines causing environmental risks

    Alistair B. A. Boxall;Dana W. Kolpin;Bent Halling-Sørensen;Johannes Tolls

  • Fate of estrogens in a municipal sewage treatment plant.

    Henrik Andersen;Hansruedi Siegrist;Bent Halling-Sørensen;Thomas A. Ternes

  • Toxicity of tetracyclines and tetracycline degradation products to environmentally relevant bacteria, including selected tetracycline-resistant bacteria.

    Unknown

  • Acute and chronic toxicity of veterinary antibiotics to Daphnia magna.

    Unknown

  • Drugs in the environment.

    Sven Erik Jørgensen;Bent Halling-Sørensen

  • Algal toxicity of antibacterial agents used in intensive farming.

    Unknown

  • Algal Toxicity of Antibacterial Agents Applied in Danish Fish Farming

    Unknown

  • Simultaneous extraction of tetracycline, macrolide and sulfonamide antibiotics from agricultural soils using pressurised liquid extraction, followed by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

    Anne Marie Jacobsen;Bent Halling-Sørensen;Flemming Ingerslev;Steen Honoré Hansen

  • Biodegradability properties of sulfonamides in activated sludge

    Unknown

  • Environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in Denmark after normal therapeutic use

    Unknown

  • Environmental risk assessment of antibiotics: comparison of mecillinam, trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin

    Unknown

  • Inhibition of aerobic growth and nitrification of bacteria in sewage sludge by antibacterial agents.

    Unknown

  • Environmental risk assessment of antibiotics: comparison of mecillinam, trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin.

    Unknown

  • Assessment of the importance of sorption for steroid estrogens removal during activated sludge treatment.

    Henrik Rasmus Andersen;Martin Hansen;Jesper Kjølholt;Frank Stuer-Lauridsen

  • Use of oxytetracycline and tylosin in intensive calf farming: evaluation of transfer to manure and soil

    Unknown

  • Determination of the distribution coefficient (logKd) of oxytetracycline, tylosin A, olaquindox and metronidazole in manure

    Unknown

  • Primary biodegradation of veterinary antibiotics in aerobic and anaerobic surface water simulation systems

    Unknown

  • Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin: A case study

    Markus Liebig;Álvaro Alonso Fernandez;Elke Blübaum-Gronau;Alistair Boxall

  • Reduced antimicrobial potencies of oxytetracycline, tylosin, sulfadiazin, streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, and olaquindox due to environmental processes.

    Bent Halling-Sørensen;G. Sengeløv;Flemming Ingerslev;Lars Bogø Jensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Steen Honoré Hansen
Steen Honoré Hansen University of Copenhagen
Kathrin Fenner
Kathrin Fenner Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Thomas A. Ternes
Thomas A. Ternes Federal Institute of Hydrology
Alistair B.A. Boxall
Alistair B.A. Boxall University of York
Carsten S. Jacobsen
Carsten S. Jacobsen Aarhus University
Jeanne Garric
Jeanne Garric École Normale Supérieure
Lars Bogø Jensen
Lars Bogø Jensen Technical University of Denmark
Frank Møller Aarestrup
Frank Møller Aarestrup Technical University of Denmark
Yvonne Agersø
Yvonne Agersø University of Copenhagen
Lars Stoumann Jensen
Lars Stoumann Jensen University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related online degrees that enhance career prospects. Students interested in broadening their interdisciplinary knowledge might consider pursuing some of the cheapest online general studies degree programs, which offer flexible curricula suited for working professionals.

For those leaning towards specialized scientific fields connected to environmental studies, geology degrees online provide focused training in earth sciences, which is integral to understanding environmental systems. These programs often blend fieldwork knowledge with theoretical concepts relevant to industry demands.

Additionally, students seeking a streamlined educational path might find value in some of the easiest bachelor's degree options, enabling them to complete their studies efficiently while still gaining essential skills for entry-level environmental roles.

For professionals aiming to merge environmental expertise with social impact, exploring the cheapest online dsw programs can be an excellent way to advance in leadership roles that address community and environmental health challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Bent Halling-Sørensen

Recently Published Articles