World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
20126
World Ranking
8514
National Ranking
3830

Bartholomew M. Sefton publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bartholomew M. Sefton sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 139 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bartholomew M. Sefton D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bartholomew M. Sefton sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bartholomew M. Sefton is affiliated with the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in the United States. Their professional profile reflects a focus within the biological sciences, as evidenced by their institutional association.

Details regarding specific research papers, co-authors, publication venues, and book publications for Bartholomew M. Sefton are not available. Similarly, no formal record of awards or honors has been provided.

Without information on primary or subfields of study, or main topics of work, it is not possible to elaborate on particular research themes or scientific contributions. However, the association with the Salk Institute suggests involvement in advanced biological research given the institute's focus.

Bartholomew M. Sefton's profile indicates active status, with no data suggesting otherwise. The absence of comprehensive publication or collaboration records limits further profiling but does not exclude ongoing scientific activity within their field.

Best Publications

  • Transforming gene product of Rous sarcoma virus phosphorylates tyrosine

    Tony Hunter;Bartholomew M. Sefton

  • Detection and quantification of phosphotyrosine in proteins.

    Jonathan A. Cooper;Bartholomew M. Sefton;Tony Hunter

  • Vinculin: a cytoskeletal target of the transforming protein of Rous sarcoma virus.

    Bartholomew M. Sefton;Tony Hunter;Eric H. Ball;S.J. Singer

  • Evidence that the phosphorylation of tyrosine is essential for cellular transformation by Rous sarcoma virus

    Bartholomew M. Sefton;Tony Hunter;Karen Beemon;Walter Eckhart

  • Expression of CD45 alters phosphorylation of the lck-encoded tyrosine protein kinase in murine lymphoma T-cell lines.

    Hanne L. Ostergaard;Deborah A. Shackelford;Tamara R. Hurley;Pauline Johnson

  • Acid and base hydrolysis of phosphoproteins bound to immobilon facilitates analysis of phosphoamino acids in gel-fractionated proteins

    Mark P. Kamps;Bartholomew M. Sefton

  • The Ick tyrosine protein kinase interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of the CD4 glycoprotein through its unique amino-terminal domain

    Andrey S. Shaw;Kurt E. Amrein;Craig Hammond;David F. Stern

  • Mutation of NH2-terminal glycine of p60src prevents both myristoylation and morphological transformation.

    Mark P. Kamps;Janice E. Buss;Bartholomew M. Sefton

  • Identification of multiple novel polypeptide substrates of the v-src, v-yes, v-fps, v-ros, and v-erb-B oncogenic tyrosine protein kinases utilizing antisera against phosphotyrosine.

    Kamps Mp;Sefton Bm

  • Analysis of the sequence of amino acids surrounding sites of tyrosine phosphorylation.

    Tilo Patschinsky;Tony Hunter;Fred S. Esch;Jonathan A. Cooper

  • The transforming proteins of Rous sarcoma virus, Harvey sarcoma virus and Abelson virus contain tightly bound lipid

    Bartholomew M. Sefton;Ian S. Trowbridge;Jonathan A. Cooper;Edward M. Scolnick

  • Direct evidence that oncogenic tyrosine kinases and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase have homologous ATP-binding sites

    Mark P. Kamps;Mark P. Kamps;Susan S. Taylor;Bartholomew M. Sefton

  • Myristoylated alpha subunits of guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins

    Janice E. Buss;Susanne M. Mumby;Patrick J. Casey;Alfred G. Gilman

  • Short related sequences in the cytoplasmic domains of CD4 and CD8 mediate binding to the amino-terminal domain of the p56lck tyrosine protein kinase.

    A S Shaw;J Chalupny;J A Whitney;C Hammond

  • Expression of a new tyrosine protein kinase is stimulated by retrovirus promoter insertion

    Anna F. Voronova;Anna F. Voronova;Bartholomew M. Sefton

  • Rous sarcoma virus transforming protein lacking myristic acid phosphorylates known polypeptide substrates without inducing transformation

    Mark P. Kamps;Mark P. Kamps;Janice E. Buss;Bartholomew M. Sefton

  • Comparison of the expression of the src gene of Rous sarcoma virus in vitro and in vivo.

    B M Sefton;K Beemon;T Hunter

  • Growth-related changes in phosphorylation of yeast RNA polymerase II.

    Meera Patturajan;Roberta J. Schulte;Bartholomew M. Sefton;Ronald Berezney

  • Mutation of a site of tyrosine phosphorylation in the lymphocyte-specific tyrosine protein kinase, p56lck, reveals its oncogenic potential in fibroblasts.

    Kurt E. Amrein;Bartholomew M. Sefton

  • Differential effects of expression of the CD45 tyrosine protein phosphatase on the tyrosine phosphorylation of the lck, fyn, and c-src tyrosine protein kinases.

    T R Hurley;R Hyman;B M Sefton

Frequent Co-Authors

Tony Hunter
Tony Hunter Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Mark P. Kamps
Mark P. Kamps University of California, San Diego
Jonathan A. Cooper
Jonathan A. Cooper Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Robert Hyman
Robert Hyman Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Erich A. Nigg
Erich A. Nigg University of Basel
John R. Engen
John R. Engen Northeastern University
Ian S. Trowbridge
Ian S. Trowbridge Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Richard A. Firtel
Richard A. Firtel University of California, San Diego
Shirish Shenolikar
Shirish Shenolikar Duke University
Peter K. Vogt
Peter K. Vogt Scripps Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Biology or Biochemistry degree unlocks a wide variety of career opportunities, especially as more programs become accessible online. For those eager to accelerate their studies or need flexible schedules, online biology degree programs offer rigorous curricula that can help you complete your education faster while balancing other commitments.

If you’re interested in a patient-centered path, consider exploring an online ASN program. These programs prepare students for rewarding nursing careers by combining biological sciences with practical training, often allowing for seamless transfer to higher degrees.

Nutrition is another in-demand field closely linked with biological sciences. With the growth of telehealth and wellness industries, an online dietitian degree can prepare graduates to become certified nutritionists or work in clinical, government, or private settings.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, obtaining a degree from one of the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited equips students to lead medical facilities and guide organizational change, making a direct impact on community health.

Best Scientists Citing Bartholomew M. Sefton

Recently Published Articles