World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 51 2496 2254 1234 1103 102 10666

Barth D. Grant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Barth D. Grant between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Barth D. Grant published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2005. 2 of the 126 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2005. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 17 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

126 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Barth D. Grant: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 6
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 17
2006 4
2007 4
2008 6
2009 8
2010 2
2011 4
2012 5
2013 6
2014 2
2015 3
2016 3
2017 2
2018 2
2019 1
2020 5
2021 4
2022 4
2023 16
2024 11
2025 1
2026 1
Total 126
Download as CSV

Barth D. Grant publications per year - data summary

  • Barth D. Grant, a Molecular Biology scholar from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, has 126 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990, 1996, 1997, 1999 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 37 years in the span carry no publications at all (1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.2 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 33 publications, 26% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2002: 11 publications (0.8 per year); 2003-2015: 65 publications (5.0 per year); 2016-2026: 50 publications (4.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Barth D. Grant publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barth D. Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 102 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131 102
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Barth D. Grant publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 53 ranges running from 47–56 to 564+ publications.
  • Barth D. Grant, a Molecular Biology scholar from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, records 102 publications - the 12th percentile of the discipline.
  • 12% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Barth D. Grant, and about 88% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 177–186 publications range, and Barth D. Grant ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 117–126 publications, holding 177 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 53% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 177–186 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 564 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Barth D. Grant D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barth D. Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130 51
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Barth D. Grant D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 40–41 to 145+ D-Index.
  • Barth D. Grant, a Molecular Biology scholar from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, records 51 D-Index - the 20th percentile of the discipline.
  • 20% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Barth D. Grant, and about 80% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 68–69 D-Index range, and Barth D. Grant ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 64–65 D-Index, holding 131 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 50% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 66–67 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Barth D. Grant is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to medicine. The scientist's work notably intersects with various subfields including cell biology, molecular biology, aging, physiology, and rheumatology.

Their research interests focus on several main topics, such as genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms, cellular transport and secretion, endoplasmic reticulum stress and disease, circadian rhythm and melatonin, retinal development and disorders, reproductive biology and fertility, and lysosomal storage disorders research.

Among their recent scientific publications are:

  • Endosomal microdomains: Formation and function, 2020, Current Opinion in Cell Biology
  • Stress increases in exopher-mediated neuronal extrusion require lipid biosynthesis, FGF, and EGF RAS/MAPK signaling, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Control of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by NIMA family kinases, 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • Large vesicle extrusions from C. elegans neurons are consumed and stimulated by glial-like phagocytosis activity of the neighboring cell, 2023, eLife
  • Quantitative Approaches for Scoring in vivo Neuronal Aggregate and Organelle Extrusion in Large Exopher Vesicles in C. elegans, 2020, Journal of Visualized Experiments

Frequent collaborators in their research have included:

  • Monica Driscoll
  • Anne Norris
  • Jason Cooper
  • Meghan Lee Arnold
  • Anna J Smart

The scientist's work has appeared multiple times in a set of characterized publication venues, with the most frequent being bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), PLoS Genetics, eLife, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Journal of Visualized Experiments.

Best Publications

  • Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling.

    Barth D. Grant;Julie G. Donaldson

  • Receptor-mediated endocytosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans oocyte.

    Barth Grant;David Hirsh

  • Genome-wide analysis identifies a general requirement for polarity proteins in endocytic traffic

    Zita Balklava;Saumya Pant;Hanna Fares;Barth D. Grant

  • Evidence that RME-1, a conserved C. elegans EH-domain protein, functions in endocytic recycling

    Barth Grant;Yinhua Zhang;Marie Christine Paupard;Sharron X. Lin

  • Genetic analysis of lysosomal trafficking in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Greg J. Hermann;Lena K. Schroeder;Caroline A. Hieb;Aaron M. Kershner

  • Rme-1 regulates the distribution and function of the endocytic recycling compartment in mammalian cells.

    Sharron X. Lin;Barth Grant;David Hirsh;Frederick R. Maxfield

  • Caenorhabditis elegans functional orthologue of human protein h-mucolipin-1 is required for lysosome biogenesis.

    Sebastian Treusch;Sarah Knuth;Susan A. Slaugenhaupt;Ehud Goldin

  • AMPH-1/Amphiphysin/Bin1 functions with RME-1/Ehd1 in endocytic recycling

    Saumya Pant;Mahak Sharma;Kruti Patel;Steve Caplan

  • RAB-10 is required for endocytic recycling in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine.

    Carlos Chih-Hsiung Chen;Peter J. Schweinsberg;Shilpa Vashist;Darren P. Mareiniss

  • Distribution and transport of cholesterol in Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Vitali Matyash;Christian Geier;Annemarie Henske;Sushmita Mukherjee

  • Rab10 Regulates Membrane Transport through Early Endosomes of Polarized Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells

    Clifford M. Babbey;Nahid Ahktar;Exing Wang;Carlos Chih Hsiung Chen

  • The P4-ATPase TAT-5 Inhibits the Budding of Extracellular Vesicles in C. elegans Embryos

    Ann M. Wehman;Corey Poggioli;Peter Schweinsberg;Barth D. Grant

  • Regulation of endocytic recycling by C. elegans Rab35 and its regulator RME-4, a coated-pit protein.

    Miyuki Sato;Miyuki Sato;Ken Sato;Ken Sato;Willisa Liou;Saumya Pant

  • EHD proteins associate with syndapin I and II and such interactions play a crucial role in endosomal recycling.

    Anne Braun;Roser Pinyol;Regina Dahlhaus;Dennis Koch

  • Caenorhabditis elegans RME-6 is a novel regulator of RAB-5 at the clathrin-coated pit.

    Miyuki Sato;Ken Sato;Paul Fonarev;Chih-Jen Huang

  • RME-8, a Conserved J-Domain Protein, Is Required for Endocytosis in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Yinhua Zhang;Barth Grant;David Hirsh

  • Mechanisms of EHD/RME-1 Protein Function in Endocytic Transport

    Barth D. Grant;Steve Caplan

  • Regulation of endosomal clathrin and retromer‐mediated endosome to Golgi retrograde transport by the J‐domain protein RME‐8

    Anbing Shi;Lin Sun;Riju Banerjee;Michael Tobin

  • Coordinated regulation of AP2 uncoating from clathrin-coated vesicles by rab5 and hRME-6

    Sophia Semerdjieva;Barry Shortt;Emma Maxwell;Sukhdeep Singh

  • Dynamic regulation of caveolin-1 trafficking in the germ line and embryo of Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Ken Sato;Miyuki Sato;Miyuki Sato;Anjon Audhya;Karen Oegema

Frequent Co-Authors

Ken Sato
Ken Sato Gunma University
Erik M. Jorgensen
Erik M. Jorgensen University of Utah
David H. Hall
David H. Hall Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Iva Greenwald
Iva Greenwald Columbia University
Anjon Audhya
Anjon Audhya University of Wisconsin–Madison
James R. Priess
James R. Priess University of Washington
Yishi Jin
Yishi Jin University of California, San Diego
Frederick R. Maxfield
Frederick R. Maxfield Cornell University
Ludger Johannes
Ludger Johannes Institute Curie
Graça Raposo
Graça Raposo Institut Curie

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology in the USA can open doors to diverse healthcare and science careers. Many students consider flexible pathways through online nursing or healthcare programs to build on their biology background and advance professionally.

For those with a nursing diploma or associate’s degree, asn to np programs are a popular option. These bridge programs offer a streamlined route to become a nurse practitioner, especially useful if you want to expand your impact in patient care.

If you have a non-nursing background but wish to make a direct switch, consider exploring msn direct entry programs online. These programs allow science graduates to efficiently transition into advanced nursing roles.

Choosing the right online RN to BSN program is crucial. Compare options like capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn to find the best fit for your needs, learning style, and budget.

Affordability is a key concern, so researching online bsn programs may help you find pathways that combine quality education with reasonable costs. This can make a significant difference as you plan your education and career progression in healthcare or biology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Barth D. Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles