World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
11557
World Ranking
6267
National Ranking
159

Arjo Segers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arjo Segers sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Arjo Segers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arjo Segers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arjo Segers is affiliated with the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research in the Netherlands. Their academic work primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences.

The main fields of study that this researcher contributes to include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Key subfields within these areas encompass:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering

Their research topics cover a range of atmospheric and environmental studies, including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Segers has published extensively, with frequent contributions to several scientific venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Atmosphere
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmospheric Environment

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Segers include:

  • The Global Methane Budget 2000-2017 (2020), NOAA Institutional Repository
  • Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe (2020), Nature
  • Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources (2020), Environmental Research Letters
  • Sudden changes in nitrogen dioxide emissions over Greece due to lockdown after the outbreak of COVID-19 (2021), Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Inverse modeling of the 2021 spring super dust storms in East Asia (2022), Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Collaborative work is an important component of Segers' research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Aki Tsuruta
  • Astrid Manders
  • Marielle Saunois
  • Hai Xiang Lin
  • Maria-Elissavet Koukouli

Best Publications

  • The global methane budget 2000–2017

    Marielle Saunois;Ann R. Stavert;Ben Poulter;Philippe Bousquet

  • Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe.

    Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Gaëlle Uzu;Jianhui Jiang;Laure Estelle Cassagnes

  • The two-way nested global chemistry-transport zoom model TM5: algorithm and applications

    M.C. Krol;S. Houweling;B. Bregman;M. van den Broek

  • Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources

    Robert B. Jackson;Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Josep G. Canadell

  • Atmospheric CH4 in the first decade of the 21st century: Inverse modeling analysis using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals and NOAA surface measurements

    P. Bergamaschi;S. Houweling;A. Segers;M. Krol;M. Krol;M. Krol

  • A regional air quality forecasting system over Europe : the MACC-II daily ensemble production

    V. Marecal;V. H Peuch;Camilla Andersson;S. Andersson

  • The global chemistry transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version 3.0

    V. Huijnen;J.E. Williams;M. van Weele;T.P.C. van Noije

  • In-cloud oxalate formation in the global troposphere: a 3-D modeling study

    S. Myriokefalitakis;S. Myriokefalitakis;K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis;N. Mihalopoulos;J. Sciare

  • Variance reduced ensemble Kalman filtering

    A. W. Heemink;M. Verlaan;A. J. Segers

  • Inverse modeling of European CH4 emissions 2001-2006

    P. Bergamaschi;M. Krol;M. Krol;J. F. Meirink;F. Dentener

  • Inverse modelling of CH 4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY

    M. Alexe;P. Bergamaschi;A. Segers;R. Detmers

  • Curriculum vitae of the LOTOS–EUROS (v2.0) chemistry transport model

    Astrid M. M. Manders;Peter J. H. Builtjes;Lyana Curier;Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon

  • The ASSET intercomparison of ozone analyses: method and first results

    A. J. Geer;A. J. Geer;W. A. Lahoz;Slimane Bekki;N. Bormann

  • Top-down estimates of European CH4 and N2O emissions based on four different inverse models

    P. Bergamaschi;M. Corazza;U. Karstens;M. Athanassiadou

  • Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations

    Robert Vautard;Michael D. Moran;Efisio Solazzo;Robert C. Gilliam

  • Regional trends and drivers of the global methane budget

    Ann R Stavert;Marielle Saunois;Josep G Canadell;Benjamin Poulter

  • Data assimilation of ozone in the atmospheric transport chemistry model LOTOS

    M van Loon;P.J.H Builtjes;A.J Segers

  • MACC regional multi-model ensemble simulations of birch pollen dispersion in Europe

    Mikhail Sofiev;U. Berger;Marje Prank;Julius Vira

  • Synergistic use of OMI NO2 tropospheric columns and LOTOS–EUROS to evaluate the NOx emission trends across Europe

    R.L. Curier;R. Kranenburg;A.J.S. Segers;R.M.A. Timmermans

  • Comparison of two data assimilation methods for assessing PM10 exceedances on the European scale

    Bruce Denby;Martijn Schaap;Arjo Segers;Peter Builtjes

  • A multi-component data assimilation experiment directed to sulphur dioxide and sulphate over Europe

    A.L. Barbu;A.J. Segers;M. Schaap;A.W. Heemink

  • Simulation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols with the climate model EC-Earth

    T. P. C. van Noije;P. Le Sager;A. J. Segers;P. F. J. van Velthoven

Frequent Co-Authors

Maarten Krol
Maarten Krol Wageningen University & Research
Henk Eskes
Henk Eskes Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
Sander Houweling
Sander Houweling Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
P. F. J. van Velthoven
P. F. J. van Velthoven Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
Edward J. Dlugokencky
Edward J. Dlugokencky National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Peter Bergamaschi
Peter Bergamaschi Heidelberg University
M. Schaap
M. Schaap Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Vincent-Henri Peuch
Vincent-Henri Peuch European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Mikhail Sofiev
Mikhail Sofiev Finnish Meteorological Institute
William Lahoz
William Lahoz Norwegian Institute for Air Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, often supported by complementary fields. For instance, pursuing a geology degree online can deepen your understanding of earth processes, critical for environmental assessment and resource management. This technical knowledge enhances your ability to address environmental challenges effectively.

Another valuable area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), essential for spatial analysis and environmental planning. Many students explore the best GIS schools offering online programs, which equip graduates with skills to interpret geospatial data and support sustainable decision-making.

Leadership and policy skills are also important in environmental careers. Online one year MPA programs provide focused education in public administration, enabling professionals to influence environmental policies and manage organizations effectively.

Lastly, understanding human behavior and societal impacts is crucial. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology can complement environmental expertise by offering insights into social dynamics and promoting community-based sustainability initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Arjo Segers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles