World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
13062
World Ranking
2932
National Ranking
82

M. Schaap publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Schaap sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

M. Schaap D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Schaap sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Schaap is affiliated with the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a particular emphasis on atmospheric science and related subfields.

The main topics covered in their work include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, vehicle emissions and performance, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, odor and emission control technologies, and atmospheric aerosols and clouds.

Their publication record includes papers in several frequent venues such as:

  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Atmospheric Environment X
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Atmospheric Environment

Among their recent papers are:

  • Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe, 2020, published in Nature
  • Development of an atmospheric chemistry model coupled to the PALM model system 6.0: implementation and first applications, 2021, published in Geoscientific Model Development
  • Modeling atmospheric ammonia using agricultural emissions with improved spatial variability and temporal dynamics, 2020, published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Estimating PM2.5 surface concentrations from AOD: A combination of SLSTR and MODIS, 2022, published in Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment
  • Prediction of source contributions to urban background PM 10 concentrations in European cities: a case study for an episode in December 2016 using EMEP/MSC-W rv4.15 and LOTOS-EUROS v2.0 - Part 1: The country contributions, 2020, published in Geoscientific Model Development

M. Schaap frequently collaborates with fellow researchers including Richard Kranenburg, Arjo Segers, Sabine Banzhaf, Markus Thürkow, and Pascal Wintjen. These coauthors have worked with Schaap on multiple occasions, reflecting ongoing partnerships in related research areas.

Best Publications

  • Particulate matter, air quality and climate: Lessons learned and future needs

    S. Fuzzi;U. Baltensperger;K. Carslaw;S. Decesari

  • Sources of particulate-matter air pollution and its oxidative potential in Europe.

    Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Kaspar R. Daellenbach;Gaëlle Uzu;Jianhui Jiang;Laure Estelle Cassagnes

  • Urban air quality: The challenge of traffic non-exhaust emissions

    Fulvio Amato;Flemming R. Cassee;Hugo A.C. Denier van der Gon;Robert Gehrig

  • Interaction between urban heat island and urban pollution island during summer in Berlin

    Huidong Li;Fred Meier;Xuhui Lee;Tirthankar Chakraborty

  • A review of operational, regional-scale, chemical weather forecasting models in Europe

    J. Kukkonen;T. Olsson;T. Olsson;D. M. Schultz;D. M. Schultz;D. M. Schultz;A. Baklanov

  • The LOTOS?EUROS model: description, validation and latest developments

    Martijn Schaap;Renske M. A. Timmermans;Michiel Roemer;G. A. C. Boersen

  • Evaluation of long-term ozone simulations from seven regional air quality models and their ensemble

    M. van Loon;Robert Vautard;M. Schaap;R. Bergstrom

  • A regional air quality forecasting system over Europe : the MACC-II daily ensemble production

    V. Marecal;V. H Peuch;Camilla Andersson;S. Andersson

  • The need for ammonia abatement with respect to secondary PM reductions in Europe.

    J.W Erisman;M Schaap

  • Evaluation and intercomparison of Ozone and PM10 simulations by several chemistry transport models over four European cities within the CityDelta project

    R. Vautard;R. Vautard;P.H.J. Builtjes;P. Thunis;C. Cuvelier

  • Secondary inorganic aerosol simulations for Europe with special attention to nitrate

    M. Schaap;M. van Loon;H. M. ten Brink;F. J. Dentener

  • A model inter-comparison study focussing on episodes with elevated PM10 concentrations

    R. Stern;P. Builtjes;M. Schaap;R. Timmermans

  • Exploring the relation between aerosol optical depth and PM 2.5 at Cabauw, the Netherlands

    M. Schaap;A. Apituley;R. M. A. Timmermans;R. B. A. Koelemeijer

  • CityDelta: A model intercomparison study to explore the impact of emission reductions in European cities in 2010

    C. Cuvelier;P. Thunis;R. Vautard;R. Vautard;M. Amann

  • Source apportionment and spatial variability of PM2.5 using measurements at five sites in the Netherlands

    D. Mooibroek;M. Schaap;E.P. Weijers;R. Hoogerbrugge

  • Operational model evaluation for particulate matter in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII

    Efisio Solazzo;Roberto Bianconi;Guido Pirovano;Volker Matthias

  • Model evaluation and ensemble modelling of surface-level ozone in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII

    Efisio Solazzo;Roberto Bianconi;Robert Vautard;K. Wyat Appel

  • Artefacts in the sampling of nitrate studied in the INTERCOMP campaigns of EUROTRAC-AEROSOL

    M Schaap;G Spindler;M Schulz;K Acker

  • Comparing emission inventories and model-ready emission datasets between Europe and North America for the AQMEII project

    George Pouliot;Thomas Pierce;Hugo Denier van der Gon;Martijn Schaap

  • NH 3 emissions from large point sources derived from CrIS and IASI satellite observations

    Enrico Dammers;Chris A. McLinden;Debora Griffin;Mark W. Shephard

  • Curriculum vitae of the LOTOS–EUROS (v2.0) chemistry transport model

    Astrid M. M. Manders;Peter J. H. Builtjes;Lyana Curier;Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon

Frequent Co-Authors

Ana Isabel Miranda
Ana Isabel Miranda University of Aveiro
Arjo Segers
Arjo Segers Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Robert Vautard
Robert Vautard École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Bertrand Bessagnet
Bertrand Bessagnet École Normale Supérieure
Carlos Borrego
Carlos Borrego University of Aveiro
Ranjeet S. Sokhi
Ranjeet S. Sokhi University of Hertfordshire
Mikhail Sofiev
Mikhail Sofiev Finnish Meteorological Institute
Henk Eskes
Henk Eskes Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
Guido Pirovano
Guido Pirovano World Meteorological Organization
Fulvio Amato
Fulvio Amato Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many students opt for interdisciplinary studies, such as a dsw programs online, which focus on social work’s impact on environmental justice and community wellbeing.

Another flexible option is pursuing an accredited affordable online general studies degree. This degree allows students to tailor their coursework to include environmental topics alongside related fields like policy, science, and communications.

Students looking for a straightforward path may consider programs listed under the easiest degree to get, which can help build foundational knowledge in environmental principles without overwhelming academic demands, making it ideal for balancing work or other commitments.

For a more specialized focus, an online geoscience degree is highly relevant. Programs highlighted as geologist degree online offer practical training in earth sciences, crucial for careers in environmental assessment, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing M. Schaap

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles